Monthly Monitoring of Plasma NfL in Treated Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis to Detect Persistent Infraclinical Disease Activity
MoMo-NfL
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Reference MRI scan is recommended 6 months after treatment onset in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), and follow-up scans at 12 months later to monitor subclinical activity. When monitoring treatment response in patients treated with disease modifying treatments (DMTs), the measurement of new or enlarging T2/FLAIR hyperintense lesions (NELs) is the preferred MRI method supplemented by contrast-enhancing lesions (CELs) for monitoring treatment response. However, some studies have suggested the deposition of gadolinium-based contrast agents in the basal ganglia and dentate nucleus of patients who underwent serial MRI acquisitions. Although significant clinical consequences of these deposits have not been demonstrated, further studies are required to better understand the potential long-term biological and clinical effects of gadolinium administration. To circumvent this potential risk, several recommendations suggested avoiding unnecessary use of gadolinium for follow-up scans. New sequences are also developed to replace gadolinium injection for the detection of active lesions. Moreover, MRI remains costly and time-consuming. In addition, systematic yearly MRI monitoring is not adapted to detect silent active lesions. This can delay identification of treatment failure and increase the risk of relapses and disability worsening, especially in the context of escalation therapy. Therefore, biological markers could allow more frequent analysis of disease activity and detect treatment failure earlier than classical clinical and MRI monitoring. Their use would greatly help clinicians to switch for high efficacy treatments (HET) and avoid potential relapses. Measurement of a structural axonal protein, neurofilament, in serum or plasma has shown promise as a marker of neuroaxonal injury and a measure of treatment response. In MS, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neurofilament-light chain (NfL) is also increased and is positively associated with MRI lesion load and disability scores and is a marker of treatment response. WThe study authors hypothesize that monthly plasma neurofilament-light chain (pNfL) monitoring can sensitively highlight subclinical (radiological disease activity) RDA by performing early MRI scans to confirm EDA and lead to timely treatment escalation. The main objective of this study is to compare the time to EDA in both arms (monthly pNfL monitoring vs. standard care with regular MRI scans), in patients with EDA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2025
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 12, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2030
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2030
March 27, 2026
March 1, 2026
5 years
December 5, 2025
March 23, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Time to evidence of disease activity between groups
As assessed by new relapse and/or occurrence of NELs and/or CELs on a follow-up MRI scan
week 48
Time to evidence of disease activity between groups
As assessed by new relapse and/or occurrence of NELs and/or CELs on a follow-up MRI scan
week 96
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Proportion of CELs between groups
week 48
Proportion of CELs between groups
week 96
Rate of clinical relapses between groups
week 48
Rate of clinical relapses between groups
week 96
Time to switch to high efficacy treatments
week 48
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (22)
To estimate the best threshold of pNfL increase (last measure as compared to the mean of 2 previous measures) with best accuracy to detect evidence of disease activity
week 96
Time to evidence of disease activity using optimized threshold in experimental group
week 96
Correlation between basal pNfL fluctuations in patients with no evidence of disease activity and brain health questionnaire score
week 96
- +19 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
pNfL monitoring group
EXPERIMENTALStandard care
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
Monthly pNfL monitoring from blood samples. In case of \>50% pNfL increase as compared to the mean of the 2 previous measures, an unscheduled visit with brain and spinal cord MRI will be scheduled
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient with RRMS according to 2017 McDonald's criteria.
- Less than 10 years from disease onset.
- Active RRMS (EDA) observed during the last 24 months: relapse and/or NELs and/or CELs as compared to a previous MRI performed within 24 months (± 3 months).
- MET (IFN, GA, TE, fumarates) for less than 24 months.
- Clinically stable disease for at least 30 days.
- Patients able to adhere to the study visit schedule.
- Patient must have signed and given the consent.
- Patient affiliated or beneficiary of a health insurance plan.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman.
- Patient unable to perform brain and/or spinal cord MRI scans.
- Patient not willing to perform monthly blood punctures.
- Patient treated with HET (S1P agonists, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, rituximab, alemtuzumab, cladribine, mitoxantrone).
- Patient with progressive MS.
- Patient unable to sign the consent.
- It is impossible to correctly inform the patient.
- Patient under judicial protection, or is an adult under guardianship.
- Female patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding or of reproductive potential who are not willing to employ effective birth control for the duration of the trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
CHU de Nice
Nice, France
CHU de Nîmes
Nîmes, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eric Thouvenot
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2025
First Posted
December 18, 2025
Study Start
December 12, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2030
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2030
Last Updated
March 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03