Health Literacy Level and Functional Outcomes in Patients With Hand and Forearm Injuries
Examining the Relationship Between Health Literacy Level and Functional Outcomes in Patients With Hand and Forearm Injuries
1 other identifier
observational
117
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to examine the association between health literacy, patient-reported outcome measures, and grip strength in a cohort of patients with hand injuries.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2026
Shorter than P25 for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 23, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 23, 2026
CompletedMarch 11, 2026
March 1, 2026
2 months
December 5, 2025
March 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
European Health Literacy Scale
The scale is based on a conceptual framework comprising three health-related domains (treatment, disease prevention, and health promotion) as well as four information-processing stages (accessing, understanding, appraising/decision-making, and applying health information). The instrument contains 47 items rated on a four-point Likert scale.The total score is standardized to range from 0 to 50. Health literacy levels are categorized as follows: (0-25): insufficient, (\>25-33): problematic-limited, (\>33-42): sufficient, (\>42-50): excellent
post-injury 12th week.
Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire
The MHOQ assesses hand and wrist status across six domains: function, activities of daily living, work performance, pain, aesthetics, and patient satisfaction. It consists of 63 items addressing both hands. Each item is scored on a 1-5 scale, and each domain score is converted to a 0-100 scale. Except for the pain domain, higher scores indicate better outcomes
post-injury 12th week
Grip strength
Grip strength was assessed according to the procedure recommended by the American Society of Hand Therapists. A Jamar dynamometer was used to evaluate gross grip strength. Measurements were performed with the patient seated without elbow support, the arm in adduction and neutral rotation, the elbow flexed at 90°, the forearm in a neutral position, and the wrist positioned in approximately 30° extension. Beginning with the dominant hand, measurements were taken on both sides. The mean value of three trials was recorded
post-injury 12th week
Study Arms (1)
Patients with hand and/or forearm injuries
Patients aged 18-65 years who voluntarily agreed to participate and who presented with hand and/or forearm injuries
Interventions
Conventional hand therapy will be applied (edema and scar management, exercises) for 12 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients who were referred to the hand rehabilitation unit for hand or forearm injuries, aged 18-65 years who voluntarily agreed to participate will be included to the study
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18-65 years
- Voluntarily agreed to participate
- Presented with hand and/or forearm injuries
You may not qualify if:
- Concomitant shoulder or elbow injuries
- History of surgery due to neurological, rheumatological, or metabolic conditions affecting the entire upper extremity
- Employment in a health-related profession
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Pamukkale University
Denizli, 20070, Turkey (Türkiye)
Pamukkale University
Denizli, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Roh YH, Lee BK, Park MH, Noh JH, Gong HS, Baek GH. Effects of health literacy on treatment outcome and satisfaction in patients with mallet finger injury. J Hand Ther. 2016 Oct-Dec;29(4):459-464. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
PMID: 27765527BACKGROUNDRoy M, Okrainec K, Novak CB, von Schroeder HP, Urbach DR, McCabe SJ. Universal Measures of Support Are Needed: A Cross-Sectional Study of Health Literacy in Patients with Dupuytren's Disease. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Feb;143(2):350e-358e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005209.
PMID: 30688895BACKGROUNDMiclau KR, Kwong JW, Tapp E, Mulakaluri A; sALLud Consortium; Shapiro LM. Evaluating the Association Between Health Literacy and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Distal Radius Fracture. J Hand Surg Am. 2026 Feb;51(2):173.e1-173.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.03.022. Epub 2025 May 9.
PMID: 40347201BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2025
First Posted
December 18, 2025
Study Start
January 15, 2026
Primary Completion
March 23, 2026
Study Completion
March 23, 2026
Last Updated
March 11, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03