Protocolised Management of Phosphate Replacement Trial
PROMPT
A Comparison of Two Phosphate Replacement Protocols for Critically Ill Patients Treated in an Intensive Care Unit: a Cluster, Crossover, Comparative Effectiveness, Randomised, Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
2,400
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of this cluster, crossover, randomised controlled trial is to compare two standard arms of treatment for the replacement of phosphate in critically ill patients. We hypothesise that protocolised restricted phosphate replacement, compared to protocolised liberal phosphate replacement, will result in reduced administration of phosphate with similar clinical outcomes. All eligible Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients will be included during their admission with the selected protocol for that period as per usual practice and treatment standards.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 20, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 17, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
December 17, 2025
December 1, 2025
1.1 years
November 20, 2025
December 4, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
non-inferiority for days alive and free of the intensive care unit (ICU) up to 30 days (DAF-ICU-30)
The primary outcome will be assessed as non-inferiority in the number of days alive and free of ICU within 30 days from study enrolment. ICU length of stay will be used to calculate. This measure is reported on a continuous scale ranging from 0 (worst outcome: death or full ICU stay) to 30 (best outcome: alive and ICU-free for all 30 days), where higher scores indicate a better outcome. The difference between groups will be expressed as a mean difference with 95% confidence intervals.
30 Days post study enrolment
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Phosphate usage
individual arm and total quantities used over 12-month study period
Patients receiving phosphate
total proportion of patients receiving phosphate throughout 12-month study period
Hospital Length of Stay
hospital admission to hospital discharge throughout 12-month study period
Hospital Mortality
hospital admission to hospital discharge throughout 12-month study period
cardiac rhythm disturbance
ICU admission to ICU discharge, throughout 12-month study period
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Liberal Phosphate Replacement Protocol
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe liberal group, a recommendation for phosphate replacement would be given if the serum phosphate concentration was 0.79 mmol/L, but not if 0.80 mmol/L.
Conservative Phosphate Replacement Protocol
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe restrictive protocol will recommend phosphate replacement to commence at a threshold of 0.50 mmol/L, and the liberal protocol at 0.80 mmol/L.
Interventions
The restrictive protocol will recommend phosphate replacement to commence at a threshold of 0.50 mmol/L, and the liberal protocol at 0.80 mmol/L.
The liberal group, a recommendation for phosphate replacement would be given if the serum phosphate concentration was 0.79 mmol/L, but not if 0.80 mmol/L.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All adult patients admitted to participating intensive care units during the study period.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Caboolture Hospitallead
- Queensland University of Technologycollaborator
Related Publications (2)
Ramanan M, Tabah A, Affleck J, Edwards F, White KC, Attokaran A, Laupland K. Hypophosphataemia in Critical Illness: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 26;13(23):7165. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237165.
PMID: 39685625BACKGROUNDSin JCK, Laupland KB, Ramanan M, Tabah A. Phosphate abnormalities and outcomes among admissions to the intensive care unit: A retrospective multicentre cohort study. J Crit Care. 2021 Aug;64:154-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
PMID: 33906104BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mahesh Ramanan
+61 7 5433 8888
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 20, 2025
First Posted
December 17, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
December 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share