Endotracheal Tube Suctioning Versus No Suctioning During Emergence From General Anesthesia
Comparison of Endotracheal Tube Suctioning Versus No Suctioning During Emergence From General Anesthesia With Endotracheal Intubation: A Randomized, Single-Blind Study
1 other identifier
interventional
408
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to determine whether omitting tracheal suctioning immediately prior to extubation is non-inferior to routine tracheal suctioning with respect to early postoperative oxygenation among adult surgical patients (aged 18-90 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists \[ASA\] physical status I-III) undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. The study addresses the following questions:
- Primary outcome (non-inferiority):
- Is the risk of postoperative desaturation (oxygen saturation \[SpO₂\] \<92% within 60 minutes after extubation) in the no-suction group not worse than in the routine-suction group by more than 10 percentage points?
- Secondary outcomes (superiority):
- Does omitting tracheal suctioning reduce postoperative cough severity and sore throat?
- Does omitting tracheal suctioning avoid increasing extubation-related adverse events? Participants will be randomly assigned (1:1) to one of two groups:
- Routine suctioning (SUC): Endotracheal suctioning plus oropharyngeal suctioning immediately before extubation
- No suctioning (NON-SUC): Oropharyngeal suctioning only, without endotracheal suctioning All participants will receive standard anesthetic care and postoperative monitoring in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) for 60 minutes. Follow-up for airway symptoms and patient satisfaction will be conducted at 24 hours after surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 17, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 5, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2027
January 12, 2026
January 1, 2026
12 months
November 15, 2025
January 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of postoperative desaturation after extubation
Proportion of participants who develop desaturation, defined as peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) \<92% at any time within the first 60 minutes after extubation.
First 60 minutes after extubation
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Incidence and severity of postoperative coughing
First 60 minutes after extubation
Severity of sore throat during swallowing
First 60 minutes after extubation
Requirement and level of oxygen therapy
First 60 minutes after extubation
Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting
First 60 minutes after extubation
Patient satisfaction
At 24 hours after surgery (± 2 hours)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Duration of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU)
From arrival in the PACU until discharge from the PACU, assessed up to 6 hours after PACU arrival.
Study Arms (2)
Routine Endotracheal Suctioning (SUC)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this arm received routine endotracheal suctioning immediately prior to extubation, performed using standard suction pressure and technique. Oropharyngeal suctioning was also performed according to usual clinical practice.
Omission of Endotracheal Suctioning (NON-SUC)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm received oropharyngeal suctioning only prior to extubation. No suction catheter was inserted into the trachea. Standard anesthetic care and monitoring were provided as per routine practice.
Interventions
Endotracheal suctioning performed immediately prior to extubation using standard suction pressure and technique. Oropharyngeal suctioning was also performed according to routine clinical practice.
Oropharyngeal suctioning only was performed prior to extubation. No suction catheter was inserted into the trachea.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18-90 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.
- Scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation.
- Planned tracheal extubation in the operating room at the end of surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to provide informed consent or the presence of a significant language barrier that prevents effective communication with the clinical team.
- Known diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), active pneumonia, or chronic pulmonary disease (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, restrictive lung disease).
- Body mass index (BMI) \>35 kg/m².
- Pregnancy or increased aspiration risk (e.g., full stomach).
- Scheduled for maxillofacial, head and neck, or airway surgery.
- Anticipated surgical duration \>3.5 hours.
- Anticipated difficult airway, defined as the presence of ≥2 predictors of difficult mask ventilation (DMV) based on Langeron et al., or a documented history of difficult intubation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Somdetphraphutthaloetla hospital
Samut Sakhon, 75000, Thailand
Related Publications (12)
Young CC, Harris EM, Vacchiano C, Bodnar S, Bukowy B, Elliott RRD, Migliarese J, Ragains C, Trethewey B, Woodward A, Gama de Abreu M, Girard M, Futier E, Mulier JP, Pelosi P, Sprung J. Lung-protective ventilation for the surgical patient: international expert panel-based consensus recommendations. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Dec;123(6):898-913. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.017. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
PMID: 31587835RESULTBlackwelder WC. "Proving the null hypothesis" in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1982 Dec;3(4):345-53. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(82)90024-1.
PMID: 7160191RESULTLangeron O, Masso E, Huraux C, Guggiari M, Bianchi A, Coriat P, Riou B. Prediction of difficult mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2000 May;92(5):1229-36. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200005000-00009.
PMID: 10781266RESULTFarrington CP, Manning G. Test statistics and sample size formulae for comparative binomial trials with null hypothesis of non-zero risk difference or non-unity relative risk. Stat Med. 1990 Dec;9(12):1447-54. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780091208.
PMID: 2281232RESULTTung A, Fergusson NA, Ng N, Hu V, Dormuth C, Griesdale DGE. Pharmacological methods for reducing coughing on emergence from elective surgery after general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation: protocol for a systematic review of common medications and network meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 24;8(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0947-2.
PMID: 30678727RESULTMinogue SC, Ralph J, Lampa MJ. Laryngotracheal topicalization with lidocaine before intubation decreases the incidence of coughing on emergence from general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2004 Oct;99(4):1253-1257. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000132779.27085.52.
PMID: 15385385RESULTL'Hermite J, Wira O, Castelli C, de La Coussaye JE, Ripart J, Cuvillon P. Tracheal extubation with suction vs. positive pressure during emergence from general anaesthesia in adults: A randomised controlled trial. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018 Apr;37(2):147-153. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
PMID: 28882741RESULTRadkowski P, Oniszczuk H, Opolska J, Pawluczuk M, Samiec M, Mieszkowski M. A Review of Non-Cardiac Complications of General Anesthesia: The Current State of Knowledge. Med Sci Monit. 2025 Apr 17;31:e947561. doi: 10.12659/MSM.947561.
PMID: 40241288RESULTHartley M, Vaughan RS. Problems associated with tracheal extubation. Br J Anaesth. 1993 Oct;71(4):561-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/71.4.561. No abstract available.
PMID: 8260307RESULTDifficult Airway Society Extubation Guidelines Group; Popat M, Mitchell V, Dravid R, Patel A, Swampillai C, Higgs A. Difficult Airway Society Guidelines for the management of tracheal extubation. Anaesthesia. 2012 Mar;67(3):318-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07075.x.
PMID: 22321104RESULTBenham-Hermetz J, Mitchell V. Safe tracheal extubation after general anaesthesia. BJA Educ. 2021 Dec;21(12):446-454. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2021.07.003. Epub 2021 Aug 25. No abstract available.
PMID: 34840816RESULTCook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C; Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):617-31. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer058. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
PMID: 21447488RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The anesthesiologist performing the intervention, the participants, and the investigators involved in intraoperative care and data collection were not masked because the suctioning procedures could not be concealed. The outcomes assessor, responsible for recording postoperative oxygen saturation, airway symptoms, and patient-reported outcomes, was blinded to the group assignment.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 15, 2025
First Posted
December 17, 2025
Study Start
January 5, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2027
Last Updated
January 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared because the ethics committee approval and institutional data governance policies do not allow external sharing of identifiable or de-identified participant-level data. Access to study data is restricted to the research team to protect participant confidentiality and comply with local regulatory requirements.