NCT07283523

Brief Summary

The goal of this pilot implementation study is to evaluate the impact of a virtual reality (VR) intervention on implicit bias for resident physicians. The main question it aims to answer are: Does watching VR experience of two clinical encounters reduce implicit bias association test scores? Is the VR experience an acceptable intervention tool for reducing implicit bias? Researchers will compare weight-based VR experiences consisting of two observed clinical encounters to a neutral education VR encounter to see if our intervention significantly impacts implicit bias association scores. Participants will be asked

  1. 1.Complete Implicit Association test for weight-based bias pre-intervention and post-intervention (immediately, at one week, and one month after the intervention) to assess their implicit bias
  2. 2.Watch either experimental clinical encounter videos or neutral education video using a VR headset
  3. 3.Participants will also complete an abbreviated IAT related to views on compliance

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
52

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
8mo left

Started Nov 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress69%
Nov 2024Dec 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 19, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 4, 2025

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 16, 2025

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2026

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

December 16, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

December 4, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 4, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Reality, VirtualVirtual Reality, EducationalImplicit Association TestWeight-based Implicit Bias

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Implicit Association Test

    Participants in both experimental and control arms will take four implicit association tests: one pre-VR to assess baseline, immediately post-VR, one-week, and one-month. Impact of VR experimental experience will be assessed for significant changes in IAT scores between the pre-VR test and the post-VR tests.

    From enrollment to one-month post-intervention

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Resident Impression of Virtual Reality Implicit Bias Project

    One-month post-VR

Study Arms (2)

Clinical Encounters VR Videos

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: 360 Video on a Virtual Reality Headset

Control Neutral VR Video

OTHER
Behavioral: 360-Control Video

Interventions

Two 360- videos watched via a VR headset where the study subject will witness a positive physician encounter with a compliant obese patient and a negative encounter with a non-compliant non-obese patient

Clinical Encounters VR Videos

A neutral education video from the New England Journal of Medicine watched in a 360-theatre setting via a VR headset

Control Neutral VR Video

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Resident physicians associated with Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Resident physicians providing informed consent to participate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Marini M, Waterman PD, Breedlove E, Chen JT, Testa C, Reisner SL, Pardee DJ, Mayer KH, Krieger N. The target/perpetrator brief-implicit association test (B-IAT): an implicit instrument for efficiently measuring discrimination based on race/ethnicity, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, weight, and age. BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 19;21(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10171-7.

    PMID: 33468085BACKGROUND
  • Gonzalez-Liencres C, Zapata LE, Iruretagoyena G, Seinfeld S, Perez-Mendez L, Arroyo-Palacios J, Borland D, Slater M, Sanchez-Vives MV. Being the Victim of Intimate Partner Violence in Virtual Reality: First- Versus Third-Person Perspective. Front Psychol. 2020 May 8;11:820. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00820. eCollection 2020.

    PMID: 32457681BACKGROUND
  • Banakou D, Slater M. Body ownership causes illusory self-attribution of speaking and influences subsequent real speaking. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 9;111(49):17678-83. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414936111. Epub 2014 Nov 24.

    PMID: 25422444BACKGROUND
  • Salmanowitz N. The impact of virtual reality on implicit racial bias and mock legal decisions. J Law Biosci. 2018 Apr 19;5(1):174-203. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsy005. eCollection 2018 May.

    PMID: 29707220BACKGROUND
  • Banakou D, Kishore S, Slater M. Virtually Being Einstein Results in an Improvement in Cognitive Task Performance and a Decrease in Age Bias. Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 11;9:917. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00917. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 29942270BACKGROUND
  • Peck TC, Seinfeld S, Aglioti SM, Slater M. Putting yourself in the skin of a black avatar reduces implicit racial bias. Conscious Cogn. 2013 Sep;22(3):779-87. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.016. Epub 2013 May 28.

    PMID: 23727712BACKGROUND
  • Bertrand P, Guegan J, Robieux L, McCall CA, Zenasni F. Learning Empathy Through Virtual Reality: Multiple Strategies for Training Empathy-Related Abilities Using Body Ownership Illusions in Embodied Virtual Reality. Front Robot AI. 2018 Mar 22;5:26. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00026. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 33500913BACKGROUND
  • Marini M, Rubichi S, Sartori G. The role of self-involvement in shifting IAT effects. Exp Psychol. 2012;59(6):348-54. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000163.

    PMID: 22750742BACKGROUND
  • Lai CK, Marini M, Lehr SA, Cerruti C, Shin JE, Joy-Gaba JA, Ho AK, Teachman BA, Wojcik SP, Koleva SP, Frazier RS, Heiphetz L, Chen EE, Turner RN, Haidt J, Kesebir S, Hawkins CB, Schaefer HS, Rubichi S, Sartori G, Dial CM, Sriram N, Banaji MR, Nosek BA. Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Aug;143(4):1765-85. doi: 10.1037/a0036260. Epub 2014 Mar 24.

    PMID: 24661055BACKGROUND
  • Tappolet C, Teroni, F, Ziv, AK. Shadows of the Soul: Philosophical Perspectives on Negative Emotions. 2018

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Bias, Implicit

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PrejudiceSocial BehaviorBehavior

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2025

First Posted

December 16, 2025

Study Start

November 19, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

December 16, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Locations