Burst Stimulation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Burst-PAF
Efficacy of Burst Stimulation-Guided Ablation Strategy in Improving Single-Procedure Outcomes for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
240
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common cardiac arrhythmias worldwide, associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Epidemiological studies in China show that the prevalence of AF in individuals aged ≥60 years ranges from 2% to 3%, with rates continuing to rise due to population aging. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), if inadequately controlled, tends to progress to persistent AF, significantly increasing the risk of stroke, heart failure, and death. Catheter ablation has become a first-line therapy for drug-refractory PAF, with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) recognized as the cornerstone procedure. However, multiple prospective studies and meta-analyses indicate that long-term recurrence rates following PVI alone remain as high as 30%-50%. This observation has prompted researchers to investigate the roles of non-pulmonary vein triggers, atrial remodeling, and electrophysiological substrate in PAF recurrence. The superior vena cava (SVC) has been identified as a common non-pulmonary vein trigger, with empirical SVC isolation demonstrating additional clinical benefits in select studies. Furthermore, the presence of atrial electrical remodeling and reentry-dependent substrate suggests that trigger-focused ablation strategies alone may be insufficient to prevent recurrence in certain PAF patients. Burst pacing-induced atrial tachyarrhythmias, such as atrial flutter or fibrillation, provide a practical method for assessing atrial substrate. Retrospective studies indicate that additional linear ablation targeting procedure-induced atrial tachycardias, such as typical atrial flutter, can significantly reduce PAF recurrence rates. However, this strategy currently lacks high-quality evidence from prospective randomized controlled trials. To date, no large-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT) has systematically validated the impact of programmed burst pacing combined with individualized linear ablation on outcomes in PAF patients, nor have standardized induction protocols or supplementary ablation pathways been established. This study addresses a critical need for optimized treatment strategies in the field of catheter ablation, with significant clinical implications and potential for widespread application. Therefore, this prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of this strategy in reducing post-ablation PAF recurrence, improving quality of life, and controlling AF burden. The study seeks to fill the current evidence gap and advance AF treatment from standardized protocols toward individualized precision intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 13, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2028
December 15, 2025
November 1, 2025
2.8 years
November 23, 2025
December 10, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recurrence rate
1-, 3-, 6-, 12-month follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (3)
The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), bleeding events, and all-cause mortality
perioperative period and 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-month follow-up
Rate of arrhythmia induction
intra-procedural
Incidence of complications
perioperative period and 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-month follow-up
Study Arms (2)
Test group
EXPERIMENTALPulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) + Superior Vena Cava Isolation (SVCI) + Burst Stimulation + Individualized Linear Ablation
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) + Superior Vena Cava Isolation (SVCI)
Interventions
Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) + Superior Vena Cava Isolation (SVCI)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ages 18 to 80 years old;
- Documented diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (self-terminating and lasting \< 7 days);
- Patients scheduled for initial radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) treatment;
- Able to sign the informed consent form and comply with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of organic heart disease (e.g., rheumatic heart disease, severe valvular stenosis or regurgitation, post-valve replacement, or dilated cardiomyopathy);
- Concomitant atrial tachyarrhythmia requiring radiofrequency ablation (including typical atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia);
- Prior history of catheter ablation for any atrial tachyarrhythmia (including atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia);
- Concomitant hyperthyroidism, active malignant tumor, or other serious illness with a life expectancy of \<1 year;
- Contraindications to anticoagulation;
- Inability to discontinue antiarrhythmic drugs for reasons other than atrial fibrillation;
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Zhibing Lulead
Study Sites (3)
Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
Wuhan, Hubei, 430071, China
Xiangyang Central Hospital
Xiangyang, Hubei, 441000, China
Yichang Central People's Hospital
Yichang, Hubei, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- The chief of cardiology department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2025
First Posted
December 15, 2025
Study Start
October 13, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2028
Last Updated
December 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
In order to protect the privacy of participants, the individual participant data (IPD) from this study will not be shared.