Packing Versus no Packing in Perianal Abscess
Comparison of Outcomes Between Packing Versus no Packing in Perianal Abscess Cavity After Incision and Drainage
1 other identifier
interventional
44
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Perianal abscess is a common surgical emergency that causes significant pain and discomfort. The standard treatment involves incision and drainage (I\&D) of the abscess cavity, traditionally followed by packing to prevent re-accumulation of pus and to promote healing. However, packing is often painful, requires frequent dressing changes, and increases patient discomfort as well as healthcare costs. Recent studies suggest that leaving the cavity unpacked may result in similar healing outcomes while reducing postoperative pain and shortening the length of hospital stay. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the outcomes of packing versus no packing of the perianal abscess cavity following I\&D. The study will evaluate postoperative pain using the Visual Analogue Scale at 6, 12, and 24 hours, duration of hospital stay, and the recurrence rate within one month. The findings of this research are expected to guide evidence-based clinical practice by improving patient comfort, reducing hospital burden, and optimizing postoperative care protocols.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2025
CompletedDecember 15, 2025
December 1, 2025
6 months
November 23, 2025
December 9, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post-operative Pain
Patients was assessed for the post-operative pain by using VAS. VAS is a tool used to assess the intensity of pain in patients. The scoring ranges from 0-10, where 0 is minimum or no pain and 10 is maximum pain.
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Recurrence
1 month
Study Arms (2)
Packing group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will undergo packing of perianal abccess after the drainage.
Non-packing group
PLACEBO COMPARATORThis group received no packing after drainage of perianal abcess.
Interventions
Patients will undergo packing of perianal abcess after incision and drainage
The patients in non-packing group received no packing of wound after drainage of parianal abccess.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients presenting in the emergency department diagnosed with acute perianal abscess (Diagnosed on the basis of history and clinical examination with ultrasonographic evidence of quantifiable collection and confirmed by needle aspiration of pus from swelling) based on history and examination, requiring incision and drainage.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with prior perianal fistulas based on history and examination
- Patients with recurrent abscess (based on history)
- Horseshoe abscess as based on examination
- Previous pelvic irradiation (based on history)
- Immunocompromised patients
- Malignant abscess
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
King Edward Medical University
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan
Related Publications (1)
Perera AP, Howell AM, Sodergren MH, Farne H, Darzi A, Purkayastha S, Paraskeva P. A pilot randomised controlled trial evaluating postoperative packing of the perianal abscess. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Feb;400(2):267-71. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1231-5. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
PMID: 25053508BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2025
First Posted
December 15, 2025
Study Start
May 1, 2025
Primary Completion
October 30, 2025
Study Completion
October 30, 2025
Last Updated
December 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12