Effect of Luna EMG Robotic Therapy on Physiotherapy Outcomes in Post-Ischemic Stroke Patients
Effect of Hemiparesis Side on Physiotherapy Outcomes Using the Luna EMG in Post-Ischemic Stroke Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
62
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study evaluates the effectiveness of the Luna EMG robotic system in the rehabilitation of patients after ischemic stroke. The main objective is to assess the impact of robotic-assisted training on gait speed, balance, and bioelectrical activity of the thigh muscles (rectus femoris and biceps femoris). The study also analyzes whether the side of hemiparesis (left vs. right) influences the outcomes of physiotherapy. Participants are randomly assigned to either an experimental group receiving robotic therapy combined with standard rehabilitation or a control group receiving standard rehabilitation alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 12, 2025
CompletedDecember 12, 2025
November 1, 2025
7 months
December 1, 2025
December 1, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Change in Static and Dynamic Balance (Berg Balance Scale - BBS)
The BBS is a 14-item objective measure that assesses static balance and fall risk in adult populations. Tasks include sitting to standing, standing unsupported, reaching, turning, etc. The score ranges from 0 to 56, where higher scores indicate better balance.
Baseline and at 4 weeks (post-intervention)
Change in Functional Mobility and Balance (Timed Up and Go Test - TUG)
The TUG test assesses mobility, balance, walking ability, and fall risk. The patient stands up from a chair, walks 3 meters, turns around, walks back, and sits down. The time taken to complete the task is measured in seconds. Lower time indicates better functional mobility.
Baseline and at 4 weeks (post-intervention)
Change in Trunk Control (Trunk Impairment Scale - TIS)
The TIS evaluates motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. It assesses static sitting balance, dynamic sitting balance, and coordination. Higher scores indicate better trunk control and stability.
Baseline and at 4 weeks (post-intervention)
Change in Postural Control (Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients - PASS)
The PASS assesses postural control in patients after stroke. It measures the ability to maintain and change lying, sitting, and standing postures. Higher scores indicate better postural performance.
Baseline and at 4 weeks (post-intervention)
Change in Gait Speed (10-Meter Walk Test - 10MWT)
Assesses walking speed over a short distance. The patient walks 10 meters, and the time is measured for the intermediate 6 meters to allow for acceleration and deceleration. The result is calculated in meters per second (m/s). Higher speed indicates better gait performance.
Baseline and at 4 weeks (post-intervention)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in Bioelectrical Activity of the Rectus Femoris Muscle
Baseline and at 4 weeks (post-intervention)
Change in Bioelectrical Activity of the Biceps Femoris Muscle
Baseline and at 4 weeks (post-intervention)
Study Arms (2)
Experimental Group (Luna EMG)
EXPERIMENTAL20 minutes of training using Luna EMG (reactive EMG-controlled knee extensions/flexions, CPM exercises, EMG biofeedback isometric exercises), 3 times a week for 4 weeks. PLUS Standard Rehabilitation.
Control Group (Standard Therapy)
ACTIVE COMPARATORActive resistance exercises for 20 minutes (mirroring the time of the experimental group), 3 times a week, alongside the standard rehabilitation program (2 hours/day total)
Interventions
Therapy utilizing the Luna EMG robot (EgzoTech, Gliwice, Poland) performed 3 times a week for 20 minutes over 4 weeks. The training utilizes reactive electromyography to capture muscle signals and facilitate movement. The session protocol includes: Reactive EMG Trigger \& Hold (Knee Extension) - 5 mins. Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) - 1 min. Reactive EMG Trigger \& Hold (Knee Flexion) - 5 mins. Continuous Passive Motion (CPM) - 1 min. EMG Biofeedback (Isometric exercises for knee extensors and flexors) - 8 mins.
Standard neurological rehabilitation program conducted 2 hours daily, 6 times a week for 4 weeks. The program includes trunk stabilization, gait re-education (PNF method), manual dexterity exercises, and balance/coordination training. For the Control Group: During the time corresponding to robotic training, patients performed active resistance exercises for the lower limb for 20 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of primary ischemic stroke
- Time from stroke: 4 to 15 weeks
- Age between 65 and 86 years
- Limited or impaired lower limb function
- Ability to walk 10 meters independently or with orthopedic assistance
- Muscle strength of at least -3 on the modified Medical Research Council (MRC) scale
- Cognitive function sufficient to understand instructions and participate in the study
- Stable clinical status
- Provided written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Hemorrhagic stroke or stroke in the posterior cerebral circulation
- Lower limb spasticity greater than 1+ on the modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
- Functional limitations preventing the completion of selected tests
- Recent orthopedic injuries affecting balance
- Prior lower limb surgery
- Sensory aphasia
- Coexisting neurological disorders (e.g., Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease)
- Lack of patient cooperation or refusal to consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Non-Public Health Care Center "Rehstab" (NZOZ "RehStab")
Limanowa, Poland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Iwona Sihinkiewicz, PhD
Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2025
First Posted
December 12, 2025
Study Start
May 1, 2022
Primary Completion
December 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
December 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11