Effects of an Aging Simulation Suit on Clinical Empathy in Healthcare Professionals Working in Long-Term Care
Mejorar la empatía Hacia el Mayor Mediante la simulación de la Vejez
1 other identifier
interventional
82
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial examined the effects of using an aging simulation suit on empathy levels among healthcare professionals working in long-term care facilities. A total of 82 participants from four nursing homes in Madrid and Asturias were randomly assigned to an experimental group or a control group. The experimental group received a theoretical session on aging and empathy, followed by an immersive experience using the GERT aging simulation suit, which replicates age-related physical and sensory limitations. The control group attended only the theoretical session. Empathy was assessed before and after the intervention using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) and the Jefferson Scale of Empathy - Health Professions version (JSPE-HPS). Results showed significant improvements in the JSPE-HPS total score and in its Perspective Taking and Compassionate Care dimensions in the experimental group, indicating that the immersive experience enhanced both cognitive and affective components of clinical empathy. No significant changes were observed in the IRI scores. These findings suggest that experiential learning through aging simulation can effectively strengthen empathy in active healthcare professionals, promoting more person-centered and compassionate care for older adults in long-term care settings.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 30, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 12, 2025
CompletedDecember 19, 2025
December 1, 2025
6 months
December 1, 2025
December 12, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in total score on the Jefferson Scale of Empathy - Health Professions version (JSPE-HPS)
Mean difference in total Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy - Health Professional Student version (JSPE-HPS) score between baseline (pre-intervention) and post-intervention for each study group. The JSPE-HPS measures clinical empathy in healthcare professionals and consists of 20 items, with total scores ranging from 20 to 140; higher scores indicate higher empathy (better outcome). The primary analysis was performed using repeated-measures ANOVA to examine time effects and the group × time interaction.
Pre-intervention (baseline) and immediately post-intervention (same day)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in Perspective Taking subscale of the JSPE-HPS
Pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention (same day)
Change in Compassionate Care subscale of the JSPE-HPS
Pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention (same day)
Change in Standing in the Patient's Shoes subscale of the JSPE-HPS
Pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention (same day)
Change in total score on the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI)
Pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention (same day)
Change in IRI subscale scores (Perspective Taking, Fantasy, Empathic Concern, Personal Distress)
Pre-intervention and immediately post-intervention (same day)
Study Arms (2)
Experimental: Aging Simulation Suit + Educational Session
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received a theoretical session on aging, functional limitations, and empathy in healthcare, followed by an immersive experience using the GERT aging simulation suit. The suit replicates the physical and sensory limitations of aging, allowing participants to perform everyday tasks while experiencing the challenges faced by older adults.
Control: Educational Session Only
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants received the same theoretical session on aging, functional limitations, and empathy in healthcare as the experimental group, but did not use the aging simulation suit.
Interventions
Immersive training session using the GERT aging simulation suit (Niederstotzingen, Germany), designed to reproduce age-related physical and sensory limitations. Participants performed common daily activities (e.g., walking, climbing stairs, dressing, interacting with others) while wearing the suit to experience the physical challenges of aging. This activity was followed by a short debriefing and group reflection aimed at enhancing empathy and awareness toward older adults.
A structured theoretical session covering topics such as aging processes, functional limitations, and the importance of empathy in healthcare and long-term care contexts. Delivered to all participants in both study arms, serving as the baseline educational component for the control and experimental groups.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthcare professional (nurse, nursing assistant, occupational therapist, physiotherapist, physician, psychologist, or social worker).
- Currently working in a long-term care or nursing home facility with direct contact with residents.
- Willing to participate voluntarily during working hours.
- Signed written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Failure to provide written informed consent.
- No direct patient contact with older adults.
- Any physical or cognitive limitation that would prevent safe participation in the aging simulation experience.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Alcorcón, Madrid, 28922, Spain
Related Publications (4)
Lee K, Han A, Kim TH. Effectiveness of Simulation-Based Empathy Enhancement Program for Caregivers (SEE-C) Evaluated by Older Adults Receiving Care. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 23;18(15):7802. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157802.
PMID: 34360095RESULTPira GL, Ruini C, Vescovelli F, Banos R, Ventura S. Could Empathy Be Taught? The Role of Advanced Technologies to Foster Empathy in Medical Students and Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review. J Med Syst. 2025 Jan 14;49(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s10916-025-02144-9.
PMID: 39806022RESULTEbm C, Sarti R, Panico P, Pagliotta M, Vinci V, Oldani S. Enhancing compassion in medical education - a comparative study of the efficacy of clinical clerkships versus simulation-based training methodologies. BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 4;25(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06687-w.
PMID: 39905468RESULTHalton C, Cartwright T. Walking in a Patient's Shoes: An Evaluation Study of Immersive Learning Using a Digital Training Intervention. Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 12;9:2124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02124. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30483174RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rosa María Martínez Piédrola, PhD
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Due to the nature of the educational intervention, neither participants nor investigators were blinded to group assignment
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2025
First Posted
December 12, 2025
Study Start
January 30, 2024
Primary Completion
July 30, 2024
Study Completion
September 30, 2024
Last Updated
December 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the dataset includes information from a small group of healthcare professionals that could potentially allow identification of participants. Only aggregated and anonymized summary results will be published in scientific journals and conference presentations.