Comparative Study Between One-Shot Dilatation Versus Serial Dilatation Techniques for Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Adult Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This comparative study aims to compare and assess the safety, efficacy, outcome, feasibility, intraoperative and postoperative complications of one-shot dilatation versus serial dilatation techniques for access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of renal stone disease in adult patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 27, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 27, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 5, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 12, 2025
CompletedDecember 12, 2025
August 1, 2022
6 months
December 1, 2025
December 1, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Mean Fluoroscopy time
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Mean access time
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Stone free rate
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Hospitalization Period
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Patients receiving renal dilatation by one-shot dilatation technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORrenal dilatation was done by one-shot dilatation technique using 30Fr Amplatz dilator directly over the central Alken rod.
Patients receiving renal dilatation by metallic telescopic dilators (Alken).
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receiving renal dilatation by sequential fascial dilators (Amplatz).
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
insertion of the Alken guide followed by a telescopic dilator between 9Fr to 30Fr, then an Amplatz sheath 30Fr was advanced over the dilator which was then removed, leaving the Amplatz sheath in the collecting system
sequential renal dilatation with Amplatz dilator set was used
renal dilatation was done by one-shot dilatation technique using 30Fr Amplatz dilator directly over the central Alken rod.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged between 18 and 70 years.
- Patients with renal stones which their size in maximum diameter is more than 2cm and indicated for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
- Patients clinically fit for surgery.
- Patients with normal anatomy of urinary tract.
- Patients able to understand the procedure and accept to sign the informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients aged below 18 or above 70 years.
- Patients with renal stones which their size in maximum diameter is less than 2cm or contraindicated for endoscopic management.
- Patients with urinary tract infection, abnormal coagulopathy state or clinically unfit for surgery.
- Patients with nephrostomy tube in situ.
- Patients with more than single access tract.
- Patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral stone procedures.
- Patients with urinary tract abnormalities or history of renal transplantation.
- Renal insufficiency with serum creatinine above 3.0mg/dL
- Patients unable to understand the procedure or refuse to sign the informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ain Shams University
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, 11865, Egypt
Related Publications (1)
Alken P, Hutschenreiter G, Gunther R, Marberger M. Percutaneous stone manipulation. J Urol. 1981 Apr;125(4):463-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55073-9.
PMID: 7218439BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hisham Arafa, Consultant
Ain Shams University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2025
First Posted
December 12, 2025
Study Start
February 27, 2022
Primary Completion
August 27, 2022
Study Completion
August 5, 2023
Last Updated
December 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share