NCT07279389

Brief Summary

This comparative study aims to compare and assess the safety, efficacy, outcome, feasibility, intraoperative and postoperative complications of one-shot dilatation versus serial dilatation techniques for access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of renal stone disease in adult patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 27, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 27, 2022

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 5, 2023

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 1, 2025

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 12, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 12, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

December 1, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 1, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Mean Fluoroscopy time

    From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

  • Mean access time

    From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

  • Stone free rate

    From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

  • Hospitalization Period

    From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

Study Arms (3)

Patients receiving renal dilatation by one-shot dilatation technique

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

renal dilatation was done by one-shot dilatation technique using 30Fr Amplatz dilator directly over the central Alken rod.

Procedure: renal dilatation by one-shot dilatation technique

Patients receiving renal dilatation by metallic telescopic dilators (Alken).

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: renal dilatation by metallic telescopic dilators (Alken).

Patients receiving renal dilatation by sequential fascial dilators (Amplatz).

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: renal dilatation by sequential fascial dilators (Amplatz)

Interventions

insertion of the Alken guide followed by a telescopic dilator between 9Fr to 30Fr, then an Amplatz sheath 30Fr was advanced over the dilator which was then removed, leaving the Amplatz sheath in the collecting system

Patients receiving renal dilatation by metallic telescopic dilators (Alken).

sequential renal dilatation with Amplatz dilator set was used

Patients receiving renal dilatation by sequential fascial dilators (Amplatz).

renal dilatation was done by one-shot dilatation technique using 30Fr Amplatz dilator directly over the central Alken rod.

Patients receiving renal dilatation by one-shot dilatation technique

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged between 18 and 70 years.
  • Patients with renal stones which their size in maximum diameter is more than 2cm and indicated for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
  • Patients clinically fit for surgery.
  • Patients with normal anatomy of urinary tract.
  • Patients able to understand the procedure and accept to sign the informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients aged below 18 or above 70 years.
  • Patients with renal stones which their size in maximum diameter is less than 2cm or contraindicated for endoscopic management.
  • Patients with urinary tract infection, abnormal coagulopathy state or clinically unfit for surgery.
  • Patients with nephrostomy tube in situ.
  • Patients with more than single access tract.
  • Patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral stone procedures.
  • Patients with urinary tract abnormalities or history of renal transplantation.
  • Renal insufficiency with serum creatinine above 3.0mg/dL
  • Patients unable to understand the procedure or refuse to sign the informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ain Shams University

Cairo, Cairo Governorate, 11865, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Alken P, Hutschenreiter G, Gunther R, Marberger M. Percutaneous stone manipulation. J Urol. 1981 Apr;125(4):463-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)55073-9.

    PMID: 7218439BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Hisham Arafa, Consultant

    Ain Shams University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2025

First Posted

December 12, 2025

Study Start

February 27, 2022

Primary Completion

August 27, 2022

Study Completion

August 5, 2023

Last Updated

December 12, 2025

Record last verified: 2022-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Locations