Predictive Value of Witness-derived Secondary Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale Scores in Suspected Stroke
Predictive Value of Emergency Physician-coded Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale Scores Based on Witness Reports and Their Association With Action Decision Time: A Cross-sectional Emergency Department Validation Study
1 other identifier
observational
235
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) is traditionally scored directly by a healthcare professional or a layperson who independently observes facial droop, arm weakness, and speech disturbance, constituting the primary CPSS score. In contrast, this study focuses on witness-derived secondary CPSS scoring, which is performed indirectly by an emergency physician who is blinded to the patient's physical examination findings and relies exclusively on symptom descriptions provided by witnesses of the patient's initial presentation. This prospective analytical cross-sectional study aims to evaluate the predictive accuracy of secondary CPSS scores obtained by emergency physicians through structured interviews with witnesses of suspected stroke cases. Interrater reliability will be assessed between secondary CPSS scores independently assigned by a senior emergency medicine resident and an attending emergency physician based on witness-reported symptom descriptions. Secondary CPSS scores will then be compared with final neuroimaging diagnoses (CT/MRI), which will serve as the diagnostic gold standard. The study will also investigate the association between physician-coded secondary CPSS scores, witness demographic characteristics, and delays in seeking emergency medical care. Research Questions
- 1.Are witness-derived secondary CPSS scores, as assigned by an emergency physician, a valid tool for predicting ischemic stroke?
- 2.Are witness-derived secondary CPSS scores of ≥1 associated with shorter recognition-to-action time (decision delay)?
- 3.Witness-derived secondary CPSS scores assigned by an emergency physician are a valid diagnostic tool for predicting ischemic stroke.
- 4.Witness-derived secondary CPSS scores of ≥1 are associated with shorter recognition-to-action time.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Aug 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 29, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 11, 2025
CompletedDecember 19, 2025
November 1, 2025
3 months
November 29, 2025
December 14, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Secondary CPSS Score
Defined as the score indirectly derived from witness reports by an emergency physician who was blinded to the patient's physical examination and relied on the observations of individuals who witnessed the patient's initial symptoms. Physician-coded CPSS score derived from structured witness face-to-face interviews; assessed as a continuous variable (0-3) and dichotomized (≥1 vs 0).
During ED admission interview
Final Diagnosis
Final diagnosis categorized as ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, or non-stroke, based on CT and/or MRI reports interpreted by independent radiologists.
At completion of diagnostic evaluation (ED visit)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Decision Delay
Reported by the witness at ED arrival
Witness Demographic Characteristics
Reported by the witness at ED arrival
Eligibility Criteria
The study population was stroke witnesses (family members, friends, neighbors, or bystanders) who observed the patient's initial symptoms and accompanied the patient to the emergency department with acute suspected stroke symptoms.
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 years
- Witnessing onset/discovery of stroke-like symptoms
- Accompanying the patient to the ED
- Being the individual who decided to call EMS or arrange transport
- No cognitive impairment affecting communication
- Not a healthcare professional
- Patient requiring advanced neuroimaging (CT/MRI)
- Provided written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<18 years
- Did not witness symptoms
- Cognitive impairment limiting communication
- Did not make the action decision
- Healthcare professionals
- Patients transferred with pre-confirmed stroke
- Lack of consent or withdrawal
- Missing/incomplete CPSS scoring items
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine
Çankaya, Ankara, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
De Luca A, Giorgi Rossi P, Villa GF; Stroke group Italian Society pre hospital emergency Services. The use of Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale during telephone dispatch interview increases the accuracy in identifying stroke and transient ischemic attack symptoms. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec 11;13:513. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-513.
PMID: 24330761RESULTChiquete E, Sandoval-Rodriguez V, Garcia-Grimshaw M, Jimenez-Ruiz A, Gomez-Pina JJ, Ruiz-Ruiz E, Ramirez-Garcia G, Flores-Silva F, Cantu-Brito C, Ochoa-Guzman A, Ruiz-Sandoval JL. Reliability of Bystander Recognition of Clinical Features in Pre-Hospital Classification of Acute Cerebrovascular Syndromes: Preliminary Findings. Rev Invest Clin. 2020 May 7;73(2):87-93. doi: 10.24875/RIC.20000238.
PMID: 33057320RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Betül Akbuğa Özel
Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 29, 2025
First Posted
December 11, 2025
Study Start
August 15, 2025
Primary Completion
November 15, 2025
Study Completion
November 22, 2025
Last Updated
December 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- After publication of the main results.
- Access Criteria
- Academic researchers upon request to the corresponding author.
De-identified dataset will be shared upon reasonable request.