Effects of Ultrasound-Guided Stellate Ganglion Block and Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Sleep Quality After Radical Mastectomy for Breast Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
136
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study aims to design a prospective, randomized, controlled, dual-center, non-inferiority trial to compare the effects of ultrasound-guided sympathetic ganglion block (SGB) and transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) on sleep quality following radical mastectomy for breast cancer. The objective is to explore whether non-invasive neuromodulation for sleep is non-inferior to invasive neuromodulation. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either SGB or taVNS treatment. Sleep quality will be assessed using an actigraphy device and sleep scales within four days post-surgery, and the incidence of sleep disturbances will be followed up within 30 days post-surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2029
December 9, 2025
December 1, 2025
Same day
November 22, 2025
December 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Total Sleep Time on the First Night Post-Surgery
Total Sleep Time Monitored by Actigraphy on the First Night Post-Surgery
the First Night Post-Surgery
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Total sleep time from the second to the fourth night post-surgery
the second to the fourth night post-surgery
Assessment of sleep quality during the first four nights postoperatively
during the first four nights postoperatively
sleep quality and the incidence of sleep disturbances on the 30th postoperative day
On the 30th postoperative day
The incidence of all complications and mortality within 72 hours postoperatively
within 72 hours postoperatively
Quality of Recovery score at 24 hours postoperatively (QoR-15).
at 24 hours postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Stellate Ganglion Block(SGB)
ACTIVE COMPARATORBefore the induction of anesthesia in the operating room, a skilled anesthesiologist performed a SGB under sterile conditions using real-time ultrasound in a blind grouping manner.
transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation(taVNS)
EXPERIMENTALThree stimulations of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) were administered to the patients
Interventions
Before the induction of anesthesia in the operating room, a skilled anesthesiologist performed a SGB under sterile conditions using real-time ultrasound in a blind grouping manner. The patient was positioned supine with the neck slightly rotated to the left. A linear probe (6-13 MHz) was placed on the neck to clearly visualize the carotid artery, internal jugular vein, vertebral artery, vagus nerve, thyroid gland, esophagus, scalene muscles, and the anterior scalene muscle at the C6 level. Subsequently, a 48mm, 20-gauge needle was inserted in a "plane" direction into the prevertebral fascia of the anterior scalene muscle. After the needle tip penetrated the prevertebral fascia and negative pressure aspiration was confirmed, 3ml of 0.5% ropivacaine was injected, and the diffusion of the local anesthetic was observed under ultrasound guidance.
Three stimulations of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) were administered to the patients: ① According to the manufacturer's recommendations and previous studies \[32\], the initial adjustment required electrical stimulation to penetrate the skin barrier. The first intervention was conducted one day prior to the surgery, with an initial electrical stimulation frequency set at 30 Hz and a pulse width of 300 μs. The frequency and pulse width were adjusted based on the individual patient's sensations until the maximum tolerable current stimulation was reached without discomfort, lasting for 30 minutes; ② The second intervention occurred immediately after the patient was connected to the monitoring equipment in the operating room, once their vital signs were confirmed to be within normal ranges. The same stimulation frequency as the first intervention was applied for 30 minutes; ③ The third intervention was administered in the recovery room after the patient's surgery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- aged 18-80 years who underwent radical surgery for breast cancer
- ASA I-III
You may not qualify if:
- \. Patients with coagulation dysfunction;
- Patients with suspected regional infection leading to severe nerve damage in the affected limb;
- Patients with congenital heart disease, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, severe cardiac conduction block, or those with implanted cardiac pacemakers;
- Patients with severe neurological disorders such as cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, or stroke;
- Patients with pain, lesions, infections, or unresolved external ear trauma in the area near the external ear;
- Patients with severe mental illness or a history of substance abuse related to analgesics or psychiatric medications;
- Patients with allergies to local anesthetics such as lidocaine or ropivacaine, as well as to general anesthetics;
- Patients and their families who refuse surgical anesthesia and those unable to complete the survey questionnaire.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PHD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 22, 2025
First Posted
December 9, 2025
Study Start (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2029
Last Updated
December 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL