EXTERNAL NEGATIVE PRESSURE DURING LISA
ENCP LISA
AN EXTERNAL NEGATIVE PRESSURE USE DURING THE LISA PROCEDURE. A FEASIBILITY STUDY
1 other identifier
interventional
25
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary effectiveness of applying external continuous negative pressure (ECNP) during less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). It will also assess whether ECNP can improve surfactant distribution and reduce procedural complications. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does ECNP during LISA improve surfactant distribution and oxygenation in preterm infants with RDS? Does ECNP reduce the occurrence of complications such as desaturation, bradycardia, or apnea during the procedure? Does ECNP reduce the need for repeated surfactant administration? Researchers will evaluate ECNP combined with LISA in preterm infants on HFNC or CPAP to see if it improves outcomes compared to standard methods. Participants will: Receive LISA with ECNP support via a soft thoracoabdominal cuirass Be monitored for procedural complications like desaturation, bradycardia, or apnea Have their oxygenation levels, surfactant distribution, and need for repeated surfactant doses assessed Primary Outcome: The procedure will be considered safe if no more than 20% of participants experience serious adverse events, such as apnea requiring positive pressure ventilation or persistent desaturation. Secondary Outcomes: Completion of LISA without interruption due to complications Reduction of FiO₂ to ≤0.25 within 3 hours post-surfactant administration Avoidance of repeated surfactant doses via the INSURE method
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2025
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 26, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 22, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2027
December 17, 2025
December 1, 2025
9 months
November 26, 2025
December 16, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Safety of the procedure
No more than 20% of neonates experience serious adverse events requiring procedural interruption. Serious adverse events: * apnea necessitating positive pressure ventilation (PPV) or intubation * persistent desaturation (SpO₂ \< 80%) unresponsive to increased FiO₂ * prolonged bradycardia (heart rate \< 100 bpm) requiring interruption of the procedure * any other adverse event or treatment failure leading to the need for a repeated surfactant administration.
15 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Completion of the LISA procedure without interruption
3 hours
Study Arms (1)
ENCP LISA
EXPERIMENTALInfants will remain on CPAP (6-8 cm H₂O) or HFNC (8 L/min) with FiO₂ titrated to maintain SpO₂ ≥92%. LISA catheter will be introduced under direct laryngoscopic vision 1-2 cm below the vocal cords. Two fractional boluses of surfactant (Curosurf, 200 mg/kg) will be administered within 2 minutes during ECNP support using Hayek RTX via a well-fitted thoracoabdominal cuirass. ECNP will be maintained at -10 cmH₂O throughout administration and for 10 minutes after. FiO₂ will not be reduced until SpO₂ stabilizes ≥92% and FiO₂ is ≤0.25.
Interventions
Surfactant will be given in two doses within 2 minutes while continuous negative pressure is applied using the Hayek RTX thoracoabdominal cuirass. Negative pressure will be maintained during and for 10 minutes after administration.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Preterm infants ≥ 32 weeks of gestational age
- FiO₂ \> 0.30 for more than 30 minutes on CPAP (6 - 8 cm H₂O) or HFNC (8 l/min)
- Increased work of breathing despite FiO₂ \< 0.30
- Birth weight \> 800 g
- X-ray confirmed RDS
- Availability of all required devices and appropriately fitting cuirass
You may not qualify if:
- Requirement for endotracheal intubation or mechanical ventilation prior to surfactant administration
- Major congenital anomalies (cardiac, pulmonary, chromosomal)
- Known or suspected neuromuscular or metabolic disorders
- Lack or withdrawal of informed parental consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (11)
Deep A, De Munter C, Desai A. Negative pressure ventilation in pediatric critical care setting. Indian J Pediatr. 2007 May;74(5):483-8. doi: 10.1007/s12098-007-0082-2.
PMID: 17526961BACKGROUNDKribs A, Roll C, Gopel W, Wieg C, Groneck P, Laux R, Teig N, Hoehn T, Bohm W, Welzing L, Vochem M, Hoppenz M, Buhrer C, Mehler K, Stutzer H, Franklin J, Stohr A, Herting E, Roth B; NINSAPP Trial Investigators. Nonintubated Surfactant Application vs Conventional Therapy in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Aug;169(8):723-30. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0504.
PMID: 26053341BACKGROUNDAldana-Aguirre JC, Pinto M, Featherstone RM, Kumar M. Less invasive surfactant administration versus intubation for surfactant delivery in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017 Jan;102(1):F17-F23. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-310299. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
PMID: 27852668BACKGROUNDDargaville PA, Aiyappan A, Cornelius A, Williams C, De Paoli AG. Preliminary evaluation of a new technique of minimally invasive surfactant therapy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011 Jul;96(4):F243-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.192518. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
PMID: 20971722BACKGROUNDRoberts CT, Halibullah I, Bhatia R, Green EA, Kamlin COF, Davis PG, Manley BJ. Outcomes after Introduction of Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy in Two Australian Tertiary Neonatal Units. J Pediatr. 2021 Feb;229:141-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.10.025. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
PMID: 33068569BACKGROUNDDargaville PA, Ali SKM, Jackson HD, Williams C, De Paoli AG. Impact of Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy in Preterm Infants at 29-32 Weeks Gestation. Neonatology. 2018;113(1):7-14. doi: 10.1159/000480066. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
PMID: 28922658BACKGROUNDKurepa D, Perveen S, Lipener Y, Kakkilaya V. The use of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) in the United States with review of the literature. J Perinatol. 2019 Mar;39(3):426-432. doi: 10.1038/s41372-018-0302-9. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
PMID: 30635595BACKGROUNDHertzog MA. Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Res Nurs Health. 2008 Apr;31(2):180-91. doi: 10.1002/nur.20247.
PMID: 18183564BACKGROUNDMohammadizadeh M, Ardestani AG, Sadeghnia AR. Early administration of surfactant via a thin intratracheal catheter in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: Feasibility and outcome. J Res Pharm Pract. 2015 Jan-Mar;4(1):31-6. doi: 10.4103/2279-042X.150053.
PMID: 25710048BACKGROUNDTeare MD, Dimairo M, Shephard N, Hayman A, Whitehead A, Walters SJ. Sample size requirements to estimate key design parameters from external pilot randomised controlled trials: a simulation study. Trials. 2014 Jul 3;15:264. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-264.
PMID: 24993581BACKGROUNDWhitehead AL, Julious SA, Cooper CL, Campbell MJ. Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Jun;25(3):1057-73. doi: 10.1177/0962280215588241. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
PMID: 26092476BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 26, 2025
First Posted
December 9, 2025
Study Start
December 22, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 31, 2027
Last Updated
December 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share