Efficacy in Preventing Hypertrophic Scars: A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Chitosan Cream, Silicone Gel & Olive Oil
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of three different topical applications in preventing hypertrophic scars in adults with scars healed after suturing. The main question it aims to answer is: Is Chitosan cream effective in preventing hypertrophic scars? Researchers will compare Chitosan cream with silicone gel and olive oil to see if there is any difference in their efficacies. Participants will be randomly assigned to three groups, with each group using a different topical application. They will be instructed to:
- apply the topical application on their scar twice a day for 8 weeks
- attend follow-up visits at 4, 12 and 24 weeks for a doctor to assess their scar and take clinical photographs
- immediately inform the researcher if they experience any side effects
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2025
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 21, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 8, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 21, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2026
January 2, 2026
December 1, 2025
11 months
November 21, 2025
December 28, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) scores
Each item is rated on a 5-point score. The lowest score is '1' which corresponds to the situation of normal skin. Score '5' being the largest difference from normal skin.
Enrolment to 24 weeks
Scar Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale scores
Scores of clinical photographs of each scar by 3 plastic surgeons. Score '0' indicates conditions closest to normal skin. Maximum scores for each item range from 1 to 4, where higher scores indicate larger differences from normal skin.
Enrolment to 24 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Side effects
Enrolment to 24 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Silicone gel
ACTIVE COMPARATORSilicone gel application twice a day for 8 weeks
Chitosan cream
EXPERIMENTALChitosan cream application twice a day for 8 weeks
Olive oil
PLACEBO COMPARATOROlive oil application twice a day for 8 weeks
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with traumatic or surgical wounds which have healed by primary intention within 14 days
- Length of scar at least 3cm
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with seafood allergy
- Patients with scar from wounds that were complicated by infection or wound breakdown
- Patients who have undergone scar treatment by other modalities
- Patients with history of keloids / hypertrophic scars
- Pregnant patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Hospital Raja Perempuan Zainab II
Kota Bharu, Kelantan, 15586, Malaysia
Hospital Pakar Universiti Sains Malaysia
Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, 16150, Malaysia
Hospital Kuala Lumpur
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 50586, Malaysia
Related Publications (2)
Kantor J. Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars. JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Jan 1;153(1):55-60. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.3757.
PMID: 27806156BACKGROUNDCarriere ME, Mokkink LB, Tyack Z, Westerman MJ, Pijpe A, Pleat J, van de Kar AL, Brown J, de Vet HCW, van Zuijlen PPM. Development of the Patient Scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) 3.0: a qualitative study. Qual Life Res. 2023 Feb;32(2):583-592. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03244-6. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
PMID: 36355319BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 21, 2025
First Posted
December 8, 2025
Study Start
December 21, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Last Updated
January 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Patient privacy protection