NCT07267819

Brief Summary

This cohort study aims to compare the efficacy of Xeomin injections for migraine management in patients with a history of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) versus those with a history of Anomalous Health Incidents (AHI). The study will be conducted at the National Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICOE) in Bethesda, MD. The primary objective is to determine if Xeomin injections result in different outcomes for migraine management between TBI and AHI patients. This is a combined retrospective and prospective cohort study design. Patients scheduled for Xeomin treatments will be categorized into TBI and AHI groups. For the prospective cohort, participants will complete a baseline questionnaire, receive their scheduled Xeomin treatment, and participate in follow-up interviews at 4-6 weeks and 10-12 weeks post-treatment. For the retrospective cohort, similar information will be acquired from existing records. Statistical analysis will compare migraine characteristics and treatment responses between the two groups. All data will be de-identified to protect patient privacy.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
25mo left

Started Aug 2025

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress28%
Aug 2025Jun 2028

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 5, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 11, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 5, 2025

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 6, 2028

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 6, 2028

Last Updated

December 5, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

September 11, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 24, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Anomalous health incidentTraumatic brain injuryHeadacheMigraineBotulinumtoxin

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Percent Change in Migraine Headache Intensity from Baseline to Peak Effect (4 weeks post-treatment) and to wearing off (12 weeks post-treatment).

    Comparison between TBI and AHI groups in the percent change of migraine headache intensity. Intensity is assessed using a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in response to the question, "How painful were the migraine headaches typically at their worst (0-10)?". For this scale, 0 indicates 'no pain' and 10 indicates the 'worst imaginable pain,' where a higher score signifies a worse outcome. The change is measured from baseline ("Before you started Xeomin treatments") to peak effect ("When your Xeomin was at its peak effect").

    Baseline, 4 weeks post-treatment, and 12 weeks post-treatment.

  • Percent Change in Migraine Headache Frequency from Baseline to Peak Effect (4 weeks post-treatment) and to wearing off (12 weeks post-treatment).

    Comparison between TBI and AHI groups in the percent change of migraine headache frequency. Frequency is defined as the total number of migraine headaches in a typical week, as reported on a patient questionnaire. The minimum value for this count is 0, and a higher number indicates a worse outcome. The change is measured from baseline to the time of the treatment's peak effects.

    Baseline, 4 weeks post-treatment, and 12 weeks post-treatment.

  • Percent Change in Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) Score from Baseline to Peak Effect (4 weeks post-treatment) and to wearing off (12 weeks post-treatment).

    Comparison between TBI and AHI groups in the percent change in the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) score. The HIT-6 is a 6-item questionnaire assessing the impact of headaches on daily life. Patient responses ("Never," "Rarely," "Sometimes," "Very Often," "Always") are converted to a numerical score. The total score ranges from 36 to 78, where a higher score indicates a more severe headache impact, representing a worse outcome. The change is measured from baseline to the time of the treatment's peak effects

    Baseline, 4 weeks post-treatment, and 12 weeks post-treatment.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Duration of Xeomin Effectiveness.

    Up to 12 weeks post-treatment.

Study Arms (2)

TBI Cohort

Patients with a history of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) receiving Xeomin treatments for migraine management. The anticipated number of participants is 40.

Drug: Xeomin (incobotulinumtoxinA)

AHI Cohort

Patients with a history of Anomalous Health Incidents (AHI) receiving Xeomin treatments for migraine management. The anticipated number of participants is 20.

Drug: Xeomin (incobotulinumtoxinA)

Interventions

Patients receive their scheduled Xeomin treatment as prescribed by their physician as part of their standard of care. The treatment protocol (dosage, injection sites, etc.) will be documented.

AHI CohortTBI Cohort

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Employees of the US Government, or adult family members of US Government employees, receiving Xeomin treatment for migraine headache following either TBI or AHI.

You may qualify if:

  • At least 18 years of age
  • Able to provide written consent in English
  • An employee of the US Government, or an adult family member of a US Government employee
  • Have received Xeomin treatment to prevent migraine related to TBI or AHI at a Military Treatment Facility or other US Medical Facility
  • Able to participate in at least 80% of the assessments
  • A US Citizen and not a dual national of the country where you are currently located

You may not qualify if:

  • Prisoner
  • Decisionally impaired and unable to provide informed consent
  • Non-US citizen

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

National Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICOE)

Bethesda, Maryland, 20814, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (16)

  • Klein SK, Brown CB, Ostrowski-Delahanty S, Bruckman D, Victorio MC. Identifying Migraine Phenotype Post Traumatic Headache (MPTH) to Guide Overall Recovery From Traumatic Brain Injury. J Child Neurol. 2022 Jun 3:8830738221100327. doi: 10.1177/08830738221100327. Online ahead of print.

    PMID: 35656769BACKGROUND
  • Erickson JC. Treatment outcomes of chronic post-traumatic headaches after mild head trauma in US soldiers: an observational study. Headache. 2011 Jun;51(6):932-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.01909.x. Epub 2011 May 17.

    PMID: 21592097BACKGROUND
  • Becker WJ. Acute Migraine Treatment. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2015 Aug;21(4 Headache):953-72. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000192.

    PMID: 26252584BACKGROUND
  • Pringsheim T, Becker WJ. Triptans for symptomatic treatment of migraine headache. BMJ. 2014 Apr 7;348:g2285. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2285. No abstract available.

    PMID: 24711666BACKGROUND
  • Theeler B, Lucas S, Riechers RG 2nd, Ruff RL. Post-traumatic headaches in civilians and military personnel: a comparative, clinical review. Headache. 2013 Jun;53(6):881-900. doi: 10.1111/head.12123.

    PMID: 23721236BACKGROUND
  • Chacko TP, Toole JT, Morris MC, Page J, Forsten RD, Barrett JP, Reinhard MJ, Brewster RC, Costanzo ME, Broderick G. A regulatory pathway model of neuropsychological disruption in Havana syndrome. Front Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 27;14:1180929. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1180929. eCollection 2023.

    PMID: 37965360BACKGROUND
  • Aristi G, Kamintsky L, Ross M, Bowen C, Calkin C, Friedman A, Hashmi JA. Symptoms reported by Canadians posted in Havana are linked with reduced white matter fibre density. Brain Commun. 2022 Mar 7;4(2):fcac053. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac053. eCollection 2022.

    PMID: 35505689BACKGROUND
  • Pierpaoli C, Nayak A, Hafiz R, Irfanoglu MO, Chen G, Taylor P, Hallett M, Hoa M, Pham D, Chou YY, Moses AD, van der Merwe AJ, Lippa SM, Brewer CC, Zalewski CK, Zampieri C, Turtzo LC, Shahim P, Chan L; NIH AHI Intramural Research Program Team; Moore B, Stamps L, Flynn S, Fontana J, Tata S, Lo J, Fernandez MA, Lori-Joseph A, Matsubara J, Goldberg J, Nguyen TD, Sasson N, Lely J, Smith B, King KA, Chisholm J, Christensen J, Magone MT, Cousineau-Krieger C, French LM, Yonter S, Attaripour S, Lai C. Neuroimaging Findings in US Government Personnel and Their Family Members Involved in Anomalous Health Incidents. JAMA. 2024 Apr 2;331(13):1122-1134. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.2424.

    PMID: 38497822BACKGROUND
  • Swanson RL 2nd, Hampton S, Green-McKenzie J, Diaz-Arrastia R, Grady MS, Verma R, Biester R, Duda D, Wolf RL, Smith DH. Neurological Manifestations Among US Government Personnel Reporting Directional Audible and Sensory Phenomena in Havana, Cuba. JAMA. 2018 Mar 20;319(11):1125-1133. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.1742.

    PMID: 29450484BACKGROUND
  • Ruff RL, Blake K. Pathophysiological links between traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic headaches. F1000Res. 2016 Aug 31;5:F1000 Faculty Rev-2116. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9017.1. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27635228BACKGROUND
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Health and Medicine Division; Standing Committee to Advise the Department of State on Unexplained Health Effects on U.S. Government Employees and Their Families at Overseas Embassies; Pavlin JA, Relman DA, editors. An Assessment of Illness in U.S. Government Employees and Their Families at Overseas Embassies. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2020 Dec 5. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK566407/

    PMID: 33411434BACKGROUND
  • Asadi-Pooya AA. Havana syndrome: a scoping review of the existing literature. Rev Environ Health. 2022 Aug 15;38(4):655-661. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2021-0182. Print 2023 Dec 15.

    PMID: 35962646BACKGROUND
  • Ashina H, Porreca F, Anderson T, Amin FM, Ashina M, Schytz HW, Dodick DW. Post-traumatic headache: epidemiology and pathophysiological insights. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019 Oct;15(10):607-617. doi: 10.1038/s41582-019-0243-8. Epub 2019 Sep 16.

    PMID: 31527806BACKGROUND
  • Lucas S, Hoffman JM, Bell KR, Dikmen S. A prospective study of prevalence and characterization of headache following mild traumatic brain injury. Cephalalgia. 2014 Feb;34(2):93-102. doi: 10.1177/0333102413499645. Epub 2013 Aug 6.

    PMID: 23921798BACKGROUND
  • Hoffman JM, Lucas S, Dikmen S, Temkin N. Clinical Perspectives on Headache After Traumatic Brain Injury. PM R. 2020 Oct;12(10):967-974. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12338. Epub 2020 Mar 2.

    PMID: 32003524BACKGROUND
  • Walker WC, Seel RT, Curtiss G, Warden DL. Headache after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Sep;86(9):1793-800. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.12.042.

    PMID: 16181945BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Migraine DisordersBrain Injuries, TraumaticHeadache

Interventions

incobotulinumtoxinA

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Headache Disorders, PrimaryHeadache DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesBrain InjuriesCraniocerebral TraumaTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and InjuriesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Central Study Contacts

David L Brody, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
OTHER
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Neurology, Uniformed Services University

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2025

First Posted

December 5, 2025

Study Start

August 5, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 6, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 6, 2028

Last Updated

December 5, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The study protocol specifies that there are no data sharing or data use agreements in place for this research. The data collected is intended for internal analysis by authorized research personnel only. While de-identified, aggregate results may be published, the consent form assures participants that their individual data will not be shared in any way that would identify them.

Locations