NCT07264712

Brief Summary

This study will be conducted as a randomized controlled trial to determine the impact of artificial intelligence-assisted wound care training provided to patients undergoing prosthetic surgery on their wound care knowledge, quality of healing, and self-care self-efficacy. It was planned to include 22 individuals in the experimental group and 22 in the control group. However, considering the potential for data loss, the study was planned to be completed with a total of 50 individuals: 25 in the experimental group and 25 in the control group. Patient Identification Form, Patient Follow-up Form, Knowledge Level Questionnaire, Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale and Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) Scale were used to collect data.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 10, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 24, 2025

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 4, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 20, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

December 4, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

November 24, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 24, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Wound careProsthetic surgeryartificial intelligence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Knowledge Level

    The researcher-created knowledge survey includes 10 true/false questions aimed at measuring the effectiveness of Surgical Patient Wound Care Education provided to patients. Each question will be evaluated out of 10. The lowest possible score is 0, and the highest is 100. Higher scores indicate higher knowledge levels. Expert opinions will be obtained from three faculty members with expertise in the field to assess the adequacy of the survey's content and scope.

    postoperative day 3

  • Self-Care Self-Efficacy

    The scale originally developed by Yu et al. to determine individuals' self-care self-efficacy levels was modified by Chica-Pérez et al. to assess self-care self-efficacy in older adults with chronic multimorbidity. The scale was designed as a 5-point Likert-type instrument ranging from "1 = I do not trust myself" to "5 = I trust myself a lot." It consists of 10 items in total. In their study, Chica-Pérez et al. reported Cronbach's alpha coefficients as 0.713 for the subscale "Self-Efficacy in Clinical Knowledge-Based Self-Care Behaviors," 0.822 for "Self-Efficacy in Self-Care," 0.881 for "Self-Efficacy in Monitoring Self-Care," and 0.878 for "Self-Efficacy in Self-Care Management." Chica-Pérez et al. stated that the minimum possible score is 10 and the maximum is 50, with higher scores indicating higher levels of self-efficacy in self-care.

    15th day after surgery

  • Quality of Recovery

    The Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) is a brief postoperative recovery scale developed and validated by Stark et al. in 2013. It is a shortened version of the QoR-40 scale. It is easier to use because it is shorter and can be completed in a shorter time. Like the QoR-40, it contains 15 questions that assess the patient's pain, physical comfort, physical independence, psychological support, and emotional state. The test results in a score between 0 and 150, with a higher score indicating better recovery quality. With the latest update, the minimal clinically important difference, that is, the lowest difference indicating a meaningful change, is 6 for the QoR-15.

    15th day after surgery

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

The purpose of the study will be explained to the individuals in the experimental group using a face-to-face interview technique, and a patient introduction form will be administered by the researcher one day before surgery. The researcher will then provide patients with visual and verbal wound care training using the "Surgical Patient Wound Care Guide," and the educational materials will be provided. To assess the effectiveness of the training, a Knowledge Level Survey consisting of 10 true/false questions will be administered to patients on the third postoperative day. Two weeks after surgery, the Patient Follow-up Form, Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale, and Quality of Healing Scale will be completed by phone.

Other: artificial intelligence-supported education

Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

The purpose of the study will be explained to the control group members, and a patient introduction form will be administered by the researcher using a face-to-face interview technique one day before surgery. On the third postoperative day, patients will be administered a Knowledge Level Questionnaire consisting of 10 true/false questions. Two weeks after surgery, the patient follow-up form, the Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Quality of Recovery Scale will be completed by phone.

Interventions

The purpose of the study will be explained to the individuals in the experimental group using a face-to-face interview technique, and a patient introduction form will be administered by the researcher one day before surgery. The researcher will then provide patients with visual and verbal wound care training using the "Surgical Patient Wound Care Guide," and the educational materials will be provided. To assess the effectiveness of the training, a Knowledge Level Survey consisting of 10 true/false questions will be administered to patients on the third postoperative day. Two weeks after surgery, the Patient Follow-up Form, Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale, and Quality of Healing Scale will be completed by phone.

Intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Those undergoing total hip or knee replacement surgery
  • Those who volunteer to participate in the study
  • Those over 18 years of age
  • Those who have no communication problems (language, hearing impairment, etc.)

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who have developed a surgical site infection
  • Illiterate
  • Unable to self-care
  • Previously had prosthetic surgery will not be included.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Erciyes University

Kayseri, Melikgazi, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Health training and research hospital

Kayseri, Melikgazi, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Yıldız GN. Öz bakım öz yeterlilik ölçeği'nin Türkçe geçerlik güvenirliğinin sağlanması: Metodolojik bir araştırma. Turkiye Klinikleri J Nurs Sci, 2025;17(1), 174-183. https://doi.org/10.5336/nurses.2024-105063

    BACKGROUND
  • Myles PS, Shulman MA, Reilly J, Kasza J, Romero L. Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jun;128(6):1029-1039. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Apr 14.

    PMID: 35430086BACKGROUND
  • Chica-Perez A, Dobarrio-Sanz I, Correa-Casado M, Fernandez-Sola C, Ruiz-Fernandez MD, Hernandez-Padilla JM. Spanish version of the self-care self-efficacy scale: A validation study in community-dwelling older adults with chronic multimorbidity. Geriatr Nurs. 2023 Sep-Oct;53:181-190. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2023.07.016. Epub 2023 Aug 2.

    PMID: 37540914BACKGROUND
  • Yu DS, De Maria M, Barbaranelli C, Vellone E, Matarese M, Ausili D, Rejane RE, Osokpo OH, Riegel B. Cross-cultural applicability of the Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale in a multi-national study. J Adv Nurs. 2021 Feb;77(2):681-692. doi: 10.1111/jan.14617. Epub 2020 Dec 9.

    PMID: 33295675BACKGROUND
  • Ismail EA, Elshafie MA. Patient-reported outcomes after femoral nerve block versus periarticular injections in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021;277(12):123958 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123958

    BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Yeliz SÜRME, ASSOCIATE

    TC Erciyes University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The person conducting the statistical analyses in the study will be blinded to the experimental groups.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: designed as a randomized controlled experimental
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
associate professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2025

First Posted

December 4, 2025

Study Start

October 10, 2025

Primary Completion

February 20, 2026

Study Completion

April 1, 2026

Last Updated

December 4, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations