The University of Oregon ACCESS Project
Adaptive Multi-tiered School-based Prevention to Promote Youth Mental Health and Create Equitable and Sustainable Systems of Care
2 other identifiers
interventional
1,440
1 country
13
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if two behavioral interventions work to reduce office disciplinary referrals, improve attendance, and reduce depression and anxiety in 7th grade students. This project combines two evidence-based programs-the Inclusive Skill-building Learning Approach (ISLA) for school-wide discipline reform and the Family Check-Up Online (FCU-O) for family-centered support-in an adaptive design to examine the unique and additive effects of these interventions on these child behavior outcomes. The main questions it will answer are:
- 1.What is the relative efficacy of ISLA vs. School-as-Usual?
- 2.What is the optimal sequencing of these interventions?
- 3.Which overall sequence of intervention strategies was most effective?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2025
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 13, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 4, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2030
December 4, 2025
November 1, 2025
2.9 years
November 24, 2025
November 24, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (11)
Change from Baseline in Child Depression (Parent Report)
Parents report on their child's depression using the eight item PHQ-8. Parents are asked to indicate how often their child has experienced symptoms over the last two weeks using a 4-pt Likert scale: 0 =not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3= nearly every day. Scores for individual items are summed together. Higher scores indicate greater child depression.
baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline in Child Depression (Student Report)
Students report on their symptoms of depression using the eight item PHQ-8. Students are asked to indicate how often they have experienced symptoms over the last two weeks using a 4-pt Likert scale: 0 =not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3= nearly every day. Scores for individual items are summed together. Higher scores indicate greater child depression.
baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline in Child Anxiety (Parent Report)
Parents report on their child's anxiety using the 7 item GAD-7. Parents are asked to indicate how often their child has experienced symptoms over the past 2 weeks using a 4-pt Likert scale: 0= not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, and 3= nearly every day. Ratings of the 7 items are summed together. Higher scores indicate greater child anxiety.
baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline in Child Anxiety (Student Report)
Students report on their symptoms of anxiety using the 7 item GAD-7. Students are asked to indicate how often they have experienced symptoms over the past 2 weeks using a 4-pt Likert scale: 0= not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, and 3= nearly every day. Ratings of the 7 items are summed together. Higher scores indicate greater child anxiety.
baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline in Student Problem Behaviors (Parent Report)
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ; Goodman 1997) is a 25-item behavioral screening questionnaire about psychosocial problems for youth, and includes competencies or strengths in addition to assessing problems. The SDQ is equally divided across five scales measuring emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity-inattention, peer problems, and prosocial behavior. Parents are provided statements and asked to indicate how true each statement has been for their child over the past 6 months using a 3-pt Likert scale: 0=Not True, 1=Somewhat True, and 2=Certainly True. Ratings are summed, and higher scores indicate more problem behavior.
baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline in Student Problem Behaviors (Student Report)
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ; Goodman 1997) is a 25-item behavioral screening questionnaire about psychosocial problems for youth, and includes competencies or strengths in addition to assessing problems. The SDQ is equally divided across five scales measuring emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity-inattention, peer problems, and prosocial behavior. Students are provided statements and asked to indicate how true each statement has been for them over the past 6 months using a 3-pt Likert scale: 0=Not True, 1=Somewhat True, and 2=Certainly True. Ratings are summed, and higher scores indicate more problem behavior.
baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline in School Climate (Student Report)
The School Climate Survey: Secondary (SCS-S) is a 36-item school climate rating scale (Center on PBIS, 2022) intended to obtain middle and high school student perception ratings of school climate. It has 8 subscales: school connectedness, peer social support, adult social support, cultural acceptance, social/ civic learning, physical environment, school safety, and order and discipline. Respondents use a 4-point Likert scale: 1=Strongly Disagree, 2 = Somewhat Disagree, 3 = Somewhat Agree, and 4 = Strongly Agree. To compute the overall school climate score, item responses are summed and then divided by the total number of items. Higher overall scores reflect a more positive sense of the school environment.
baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Change from Baseline in School Climate (Teacher Report)
The School Climate Survey: School Personnel (Center on PBIS, 2022) includes 29 items and 5 subscales, including staff connectedness, structure for learning, school safety, physical environment, peer and adult relations, and parent involvement. School personnel rate items with a four-point Likert scale: 1=Strongly Disagree, 2=Somewhat Disagree, 3=Somewhat Agree, and 4=Strongly Agree. To compute the overall school climate score, item responses are summed and then divided by the total number of items. Higher overall scores reflect a more positive sense of the school environment.
Fall, Winter, and Spring of one academic year (e.g., baseline, 6 months, 10 months)
Change from Baseline in Number of ODRs, In-School Suspensions, and Out-of-School Suspensions (School-Level)
The number of office disciplinary referrals (ODRs), in-school (ISS), and out-of-school suspensions (OSS) will be gleaned from school records and aggregated at the school-level.
Fall, winter, and spring of two academic years (baseline, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 18 months, 21 months)
Change from Baseline in Number of ODRs, In-School Suspensions, and Out-of-School Suspensions (Student-Level)
The number of office disciplinary referrals (ODRs), in-school (ISS), and out-of-school suspensions (OSS) received by participating students will be gleaned from school records and recorded at the student-level for two academic years (6th grade and 7th grade).
baseline, 12 months
Change from Baseline in Number of Days Absent from School (Student-Level)
The number of days that participating students were absent from school will be gleaned from school records and recorded at the student-level for two academic years (6th grade and 7th grade).
Time Frame: baseline, 12 months
Study Arms (6)
School-As-Usual (SAU) Only
NO INTERVENTIONStudents were selected to participate in the study based on meeting attendance and behavioral criteria in 6th grade for Tier 2 or Tier 3 school supports. Students in this arm attended 7th grade at a school in the School-As-Usual condition and therefore did not receive the Tier 1 intervention, ISLA. In addition, in January of 7th grade their school behavior and attendance no longer met criteria for assignment to the Tier 2 intervention, the Family Check-up Online. Thus, students in this arm received neither the ISLA nor FCU-O interventions.
SAU + FCU Online Only
EXPERIMENTALStudents were selected to participate in the study based on meeting attendance and behavioral criteria in 6th grade for Tier 2 or Tier 3 school supports. Students in this arm attended 7th grade at a school in the School-As-Usual condition and therefore did not receive the Tier 1 intervention, ISLA. In January of 7th grade their school behavior and attendance continued to meet criteria for assignment to Tier 2 intervention, and thus they received the Family Check-Up Online. In this arm, students' parents were assigned to receive the Family Check-Up Online digital intervention only (without supportive telehealth coaching).
SAU + FCU Online with Telehealth Coaching
EXPERIMENTALStudents were selected to participate in the study based on meeting attendance and behavioral criteria in 6th grade for Tier 2 or Tier 3 school supports. Students in this arm attended 7th grade at a school in the SAU condition, and therefore did not receive the Tier 1 intervention, ISLA. In January of 7th grade their school behavior and attendance continued to meet criteria for Tier 2 intervention, and thus they received the Family Check-Up Online. In this arm, students' parents were assigned to receive the Family Check-Up Online digital intervention and telehealth coaching to support uptake of FCU content.
ISLA intervention + FCU Online Only
EXPERIMENTALStudents were selected to participate in the study based on meeting attendance and behavioral criteria in 6th grade for Tier 2 or Tier 3 school supports. Students in this arm attended 7th grade at a school which implemented the school-wide Tier 1 intervention, ISLA. In January of 7th grade their school behavior and attendance continued to meet criteria for Tier 2 intervention, and thus they received the Family Check-Up Online. In this arm, students' parents were assigned to receive the Family Check-Up Online digital intervention only (without supportive telehealth coaching).
ISLA intervention+ FCU Online with Telehealth Coaching
EXPERIMENTALStudents were selected to participate in the study based on meeting attendance and behavioral criteria in 6th grade for Tier 2 or Tier 3 school supports. Students in this arm attended a school which implemented the school-wide Tier 1 intervention, ISLA. In January of 7th grade their school behavior and attendance continued to meet criteria for Tier 2 intervention, and thus they received the Family Check-Up Online. In this arm, students' parents were assigned to receive the Family Check-Up Online digital intervention with telehealth coaching to support uptake of the FCU content.
ISLA Intervention Only
EXPERIMENTALStudents were selected to participate in the study based on meeting attendance and behavioral criteria in 6th grade for Tier 2 or Tier 3 school supports. Students in this arm attended a school which implemented the school-wide Tier 1 intervention, ISLA. In January of 7th grade their attendance and behavior no longer met criteria for Tier 2 intervention. Thus, their parents were not offered the FCU Online digital intervention.
Interventions
ISLA is a school-wide, multi-component, instructional and restorative alternative to exclusionary discipline that involves universal prevention grounded in positive, preventative classroom strategies for all students, and layers on additional supports for students in need.Derived from the original School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions model (SWPBIS) with roots in social learning theory, ISLA emphasizes that behavior is learned through modeling and teaching, and that environmental factors and the quality of teaching practices influence when and how a behavior is likely to occur. The ISLA model emphasizes ongoing training and coaching of classroom-level prevention strategies and practices that teachers use to promote building strong relationships, preventing school disconnectedness, and improving instructional and restorative alternatives to exclusion.
The Family Check-Up Online is a digital intervention that includes an assessment, computer-generated feedback, and intervention modules that focus on improving family relationships and parenting skills in order to reduce child mental health problems and to improve child self-regulation. These modules include Healthy Behaviors for Stressful Times, Positive Parenting, Rules and Consequences, Supporting School Success, and Communication.
This intervention is the Family Check-Up Online plus telehealth support from a parenting coach. The Family Check-Up Online is a digital intervention that includes an assessment, computer-generated feedback, and intervention modules that focus on improving family relationships and parenting skills in order to reduce child mental health problems and to improve child self-regulation. These modules include Healthy Behaviors for Stressful Times, Positive Parenting, Rules and Consequences, Supporting School Success, and Communication. A coach based at the child's school meets with caregivers via telehealth modality to provide motivation and to help caregivers tailor the content of the modules to their specific child and family's needs.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The middle school must be located in Oregon and serve a population with high levels of NIH-defined health disparity; and
- The middle school must have a history of collaboration with the National PBIS Technical Assistance Center or the Northwest PBIS network.
- School staff must be employed by a participating middle school; and
- School staff must be willing and interested in receiving training and support throughout implementation
- The target child must attend a middle school which has been randomly assigned to receive the ISLA intervention or School-as-Usual;
- The target child must be in 7th grade and between the ages of 11 and 14;
- The caregiver must be the parent or legal guardian of the target child;
- The target child must exhibit at least one of the following risk factors during the prior academic year (6th grade):
- or more office discipline referrals;
- poor attendance, i.e., missing 2 more school days per month; and
- The caregiver must have a smartphone with text messaging capability, access to email and internet.
You may not qualify if:
- Families will be excluded from the study if:
- the caregiver is unable to read in either English or Spanish;
- either member of the parent-child dyad chooses not to participate (i.e., both members of the dyad need to consent/ assent); or
- the family is already participating in another study at the University of Oregon's Prevention Science Institute.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Oregonlead
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)collaborator
Study Sites (13)
Lincoln Middle School
Cottage Grove, Oregon, 97424, United States
Monroe Middle School
Eugene, Oregon, 97401, United States
Kelly Middle School
Eugene, Oregon, 97404, United States
Madison Middle School
Eugene, Oregon, 97404, United States
Arts & Technology Academy
Eugene, Oregon, 97405, United States
Kennedy Middle School
Eugene, Oregon, 97405, United States
Roosevelt Middle School
Eugene, Oregon, 97405, United States
Spencer Butte Middle School
Eugene, Oregon, 97405, United States
Cal Young Middle School
Eugene, Oregon, 97408, United States
Briggs Middle School
Springfield, Oregon, 97477, United States
Hamlin Middle School
Springfield, Oregon, 97477, United States
Agnes Stewart Middle School
Springfield, Oregon, 97478, United States
Thurston Middle School
Springfield, Oregon, 97478, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Beth Stormshak, PhD
University of Oregon
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rhonda Nese, PhD
University of Oregon
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 24, 2025
First Posted
December 4, 2025
Study Start
August 13, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2030
Last Updated
December 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- After completion of the project funding period, de-identified, final research data generated in the research activities, along with metadata, descriptors, and protocols, will be shared with the broader scientific community through dissemination efforts and uploads to the NIMH Data Archive.
- Access Criteria
- External researcher requests for de-identified individual-level data must be accompanied by a signed Data Use Agreement, and researchers must document that they are working under an institution with a Federal Wide Assurance (FWA).To optimize usage of the data, the website at the University of Oregon's ACCESS Center will provide clear instructions for accessing the data.
De-identified, final research data generated in the research activities, along with metadata, descriptors, and protocols, will be shared with the broader scientific community. Material to be shared include detailed protocols and recommendations for schools to increase the health and wellbeing of middle schoolers. Researchers outside of the ACCESS Center will have access to a standard de-identified, individual-level dataset held to the same standard as that established by the HIPAA Privacy Rule. General documentation will be available without cost in the form of PDF files. Potentially identifying fields as defined in the HIPAA Privacy Rule will not be released to outside researchers.