NCT07264114

Brief Summary

This randomized, single-center, parallel-group superiority trial will evaluate the effect of an 8-week aquatic High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) program on balance, physical function, and sarcopenia-related outcomes in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD). The intervention aims to deliver Tabata-style aquatic HIIT (3 sessions/week) in a therapeutic pool to determine adherence and preliminary efficacy compared with standard care (no structured exercise program).

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
56

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable parkinson-disease

Timeline
0mo left

Started Dec 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable parkinson-disease

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress98%
Dec 2025May 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 18, 2025

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 4, 2025

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 10, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 10, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 10, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

May 5, 2026

Status Verified

May 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

November 18, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 4, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Parkinson's DiseaseAquatic ExerciseHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingBalanceSarcopeniaQuality of LifeSleep Quality

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Rate of changes in Balance Ability

    Evaluating the effect of aquatic HIIT on balance using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), a 14-item performance-based tool assessing static and dynamic balance through functional tasks like sitting to standing, reaching forward, and turning 360 degrees. Items are scored on a 5-point ordinal scale (0-4) based on ability and time to complete, with a total score ranging from 0 (worst) to 56 (best); scores of 0-20 indicate wheelchair-bound, 21-40 indicate walking with assistance, and 41-56 indicate independent. In PD, scores \<45 suggest high fall risk, and the BBS has excellent intra-rater reliability (ICC=0.98), inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.97), and criterion validity, correlating with other PD-specific measures like UPDRS.

    Pre-intervention and Week 8

  • Rate of changes in Physical Function

    Evaluating the effect of aquatic HIIT on physical function using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), a composite test including three subcomponents: balance (holding side-by-side, semi-tandem, and tandem stands for up to 10 seconds each, scored 0-4), gait speed (timed 4-meter walk at usual pace, scored 0-4 based on time quartiles), and chair stand (time to complete five rises from a chair without arms, scored 0-4). Total score ranges from 0 (worst) to 12 (best), with scores \<10 indicating high risk for mobility limitations and falls in older adults, including PD patients. The SPPB demonstrates high test-retest reliability (ICC=0.92), intra-rater reliability, and validity in predicting functional decline and executive function associations in PD.

    Pre-intervention and Week 8

  • Rate of changes in Muscle Mass (Sarcopenia)

    Evaluating the effect of aquatic HIIT on sarcopenia-related muscle mass using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA), a non-invasive technique that estimates body composition by measuring resistance and reactance to a low-level electrical current, calculating skeletal muscle mass (ASM) and phase angle (PhA). ASM is indexed to height squared (ASM/height² in kg/m²), with sarcopenia diagnosed per EWGSOP2 criteria (\<7.0 kg/m² for men, \<5.5 kg/m² for women); PhA cut-offs for sarcopenia are ≤4.05° (92.9% sensitivity, 53.8% specificity) for men and ≤3.75° (78.9% sensitivity, 51.1% specificity) for women. In PD, BIA is reliable for detecting sarcopenia (prevalence 40-55%) with high correlation to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as gold standard (r=0.85-0.90 for ASM), predictive validity (adjOR=0.147 for PhA), and good test-retest reliability (ICC=0.88-0.95), though wide diagnostic variations exist across criteria.

    Pre-intervention and Week 8

  • Rate of changes in Muscle Strength

    Evaluating the effect of aquatic HIIT on muscle strength using a Handgrip Dynamometer, a handheld device that quantifies isometric grip force in kilograms or pounds during maximal voluntary contraction (typically 3 trials per hand, with the highest or average value used). Measurements are taken in a standardized seated position with the elbow flexed at 90 degrees; normative values decline with age, and low grip strength (\<27 kg men, \<16 kg women) is a sarcopenia criterion in PD. The dynamometer shows fair to excellent test-retest reliability (ICC=0.95-0.98) and intra-rater reliability in PD, with good validity for overall strength assessment.

    Pre-intervention and Week 8

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Change in Quality of Life

    Pre-intervention and Week 8

  • Change in Sleep Quality

    Pre-intervention and Week 8

  • Adherence Rate

    Week 0 to Week 8 (intervention period)

  • Adverse Events

    Week 0 to Week 12 (including 4-week follow-up)

Study Arms (2)

Aquatic HIIT group

EXPERIMENTAL

The participants in the experimental group will undertake supervised aquatic high-intensity interval exercise 3×/week for 8 weeks (Tabata method). Each session consists of a 10-min warm-up, Tabata sets (20s maximal-effort aquatic exercises-e.g., water running, jumping jacks, resistance with foam dumbbells/paddles-followed by 10s rest, 8 cycles/set; total set=4 min), and a 5-min cool-down. Intensity monitored using Borg RPE scale (6-20), target 15-17 ("hard" to "very hard") during work phases to ensure HIIT delivery. RPE recorded at end of each set with real-time feedback (e.g., "push harder" if \<15). Validated in PD trials; RPE 15-17 ≈80-90% max HR in water (HR optional). Pool depth waist-to-chest (≈1.2-1.4 m), temp 32-34 °C. Delivered in indoor therapeutic pool of Pardis Institute by certified specialists. Standard medical care continues. Adherence via attendance logs; \>20% missed = non-adherent.

Behavioral: Aquatic HIIT with adherence/support package

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Patients allocated to the control group will receive their usual clinical management for Parkinson's disease, including pharmacological therapy as prescribed by their neurologist, and will not participate in any structured exercise program during the 8-week study period. Low-intensity daily activities and usual physical routines are permitted. Control participants will be advised to maintain their standard treatment regimen and customary activity patterns during the trial.

Interventions

The participants in the behavioral component will receive the same supervised aquatic HIIT program described above plus structured behavioral/support measures to maximize adherence and safety. These include: an initial individual education session explaining benefits/risks and protocol; supervised real-time feedback during each session from exercise specialists; flexible scheduling options to accommodate participants; weekly review of attendance and brief motivational follow-up (phone call or in-person) for participants with missed sessions; individualized adjustments to intensity/duration based on participant feedback and safety; and documentation of reasons for non-attendance. All behavioral/support activities are delivered by trained research staff and exercise physiologists and are recorded in session logs. (These measures are drawn from the protocol's adherence and retention strategies.)

Aquatic HIIT group

Eligibility Criteria

Age55 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • PD stages 2-3 based on Hoehn and Yahr classification system
  • Balance difficulty (BBS score \<45)
  • Reduced motor function
  • Sarcopenia (per EWGSOP2 criteria)
  • Age ≥ 55
  • Permission from their doctors to participate
  • Absence of a history of myocardial infarction within the past 3 months
  • Capacity to provide informed consent to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Cardiac instability (angina, decompensated congestive heart failure, severe arteriovenous stenosis, uncontrolled arrhythmias, etc.)
  • Active infection or acute medical illness
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Labile glycemic control
  • Inability to exercise (e.g. lower extremity amputation with no prosthesis)
  • Severe musculoskeletal pain at rest or with minimal activity
  • Inability to sit, stand or walk unassisted (walking device such as cane or walker allowed)
  • Shortness of breath at rest or with activities of daily living

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Pardis specialized wellness institute

Isfahan, Iran

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Harpham C, Gunn H, Marsden J, Bescos Garcia R, Connolly L. Home-based high-intensity interval training for people with Parkinson's: Protocol for the HIIT-Home4Parkinson's randomized, controlled feasibility study. Health Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 7;7(1):e1800. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1800. eCollection 2024 Jan.

    PMID: 38192731BACKGROUND
  • Kathia MM, Duplea SG, Bommarito JC, Hinks A, Leake E, Shannon J, Pitman J, Khangura PK, Coates AM, Slysz JT, Katerberg C, McCarthy DG, Beedie T, Malcolm R, Witton LA, Connolly BS, Burr JF, Vallis LA, Power GA, Millar PJ. High-intensity interval versus moderate-intensity continuous cycling training in Parkinson's disease: a randomized trial. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2024 Sep 1;137(3):603-615. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00219.2024. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

    PMID: 39008618BACKGROUND
  • Volpe D, Giantin MG, Maestri R, Frazzitta G. Comparing the effects of hydrotherapy and land-based therapy on balance in patients with Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2014 Dec;28(12):1210-7. doi: 10.1177/0269215514536060. Epub 2014 Jun 3.

    PMID: 24895382BACKGROUND
  • Hande D, Shinde S, Dhumale A, Kale HY. Effects of Aquatic-Based Resistance, Balance, and Proprioceptive Training on Ankle-Foot Malalignments in Postmenopausal Obese Women. Cureus. 2025 Jul 8;17(7):e87571. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87571. eCollection 2025 Jul.

    PMID: 40786333BACKGROUND
  • Li Y, Zhuang R, Zhang J, Liu X. The effect of different exercise training modes on improving quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease: a network analysis. Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 2;16:1601080. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1601080. eCollection 2025.

    PMID: 40672448BACKGROUND
  • Pezzini JV, Trevisan DD, Dominiak Soares VH, Gauer LE, Lima MMS. Sleep Quality in Parkinson Disease: Clinical Insights and PSQI Reliability Assessment. Sleep Sci. 2024 Oct 23;18(2):e147-e154. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791235. eCollection 2025 Jun.

    PMID: 40672893BACKGROUND
  • Berardi A, Galeoto G, Valente D, Conte A, Fabbrini G, Tofani M. Validity and reliability of the 12-item Berg Balance Scale in an Italian population with Parkinson's disease: A cross sectional study. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2020 Jul;78(7):419-423. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X20200030. Epub 2020 Jun 8.

    PMID: 32520233BACKGROUND
  • Petkus AJ, Foreman RP, Pilgrim M, Kim A, Hong E, Fisher BE, Van Horn JD, Wing D, Jakowec MW, Schiehser DM, Petzinger GM. Longitudinal associations between physical performance and cognition in individuals with Parkinson's disease. Clin Park Relat Disord. 2025 Jul 17;13:100370. doi: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100370. eCollection 2025.

    PMID: 40756809BACKGROUND
  • Yilmaz M, Atik-Altinok Y, Seyidoglu Yuksel D, Acarer A, Bozkurt D, Savas S, Sarac ZF, Akcicek F. Evaluation of sarcopenia and phase angle in elderly patients with Parkinson's Disease. Int J Neurosci. 2025 Apr;135(4):488-495. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2024.2310180. Epub 2024 Feb 1.

    PMID: 38275120BACKGROUND
  • Villafane JH, Valdes K, Buraschi R, Martinelli M, Bissolotti L, Negrini S. Reliability of the Handgrip Strength Test in Elderly Subjects With Parkinson Disease. Hand (N Y). 2016 Mar;11(1):54-8. doi: 10.1177/1558944715614852. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

    PMID: 27418890BACKGROUND
  • Cugusi L, Manca A, Bergamin M, Di Blasio A, Monticone M, Deriu F, Mercuro G. Aquatic exercise improves motor impairments in people with Parkinson's disease, with similar or greater benefits than land-based exercise: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2019 Apr;65(2):65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

    PMID: 30904467BACKGROUND
  • Yang Y, Wang G, Zhang S, Wang H, Zhou W, Ren F, Liang H, Wu D, Ji X, Hashimoto M, Wei J. Efficacy and evaluation of therapeutic exercises on adults with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2022 Oct 21;22(1):813. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03510-9.

    PMID: 36271367BACKGROUND
  • Gamborg M, Hvid LG, Dalgas U, Langeskov-Christensen M. Parkinson's disease and intensive exercise therapy - An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2022 May;145(5):504-528. doi: 10.1111/ane.13579. Epub 2022 Jan 8.

    PMID: 34997759BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Parkinson DiseaseSarcopeniaSleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Parkinsonian DisordersBasal Ganglia DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMovement DisordersSynucleinopathiesNeurodegenerative DiseasesMuscular AtrophyNeuromuscular ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsAtrophyPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and SymptomsSleep Disorders, IntrinsicDyssomniasSleep Wake DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Mohammad Ali Tabibi, Dr

    Pardis Specialized Wellness Institute

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
None (Open Label) for participants and care providers; Single (Outcomes Assessor) for functional tests; Blinded data analysis."
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will be randomly allocate to intervention group or control group and will be examined in the same way.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2025

First Posted

December 4, 2025

Study Start

December 10, 2025

Primary Completion

March 10, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 10, 2026

Last Updated

May 5, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in the published article, after deidentification are to be shared

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
The data will be available starting 6 months after publication of primary results (anticipated March 2026). No end date.
Access Criteria
Not applicable. It will be accessible for public.

Locations