Gingival Hyperplasia Treatment With Surgical Scalpel vs Diode Laser in Orthodontic Patients.
GINGILASCA
Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics of Orthodontic Patients With Fixed Appliances Treated for Gingival Hyperplasia Using Surgical Scalpel and Diode Laser: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
2 other identifiers
interventional
13
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Gingival enlargement is a common complication in orthodontic patients, often resulting from plaque accumulation and chronic inflammatory response during fixed appliance therapy. Surgical gingivectomy is frequently required to restore gingival contour, improve esthetics, and facilitate oral hygiene. Traditionally, gingivectomy is performed using a scalpel, but laser-assisted techniques have recently gained popularity due to their potential benefits, including reduced bleeding, postoperative discomfort, and faster healing. This randomized split-mouth clinical trial aims to compare the clinical and microbiological outcomes of gingivectomy performed with a diode laser versus conventional scalpel surgery in orthodontic patients presenting with gingival enlargement. Clinical parameters, microbial profiles, and patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated at baseline and at multiple postoperative intervals to assess the effectiveness and advantages of each technique.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 4, 2025
CompletedDecember 4, 2025
November 1, 2025
7 months
November 23, 2025
November 23, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Gingival margin position
Reduction in Gingival Overgrowth Index
1 month and 3 months after gingivectomy
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) Reduction
1 month and 3 months after gingivectomy
Reduction in Gingival Index (GI)
1 month and 3 months after gingivectomy
Reduction in Plaque Index (PlI)
1 month and 3 months after gingivectomy
Reduction in Bleeding on Probing (BoP)
1 month and 3 months after gingivectomy
Microbiological changes in subgingival plaque
1 month and 3 months after gingivectomy
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Scalpel Gingivectomy
EXPERIMENTALConventional gingivectomy performed using a surgical scalpel. Gingival overgrowth was excised using standard surgical technique under local anesthesia.
Diode Laser Gingivectomy
EXPERIMENTALGingivectomy performed using a diode laser. Laser parameters were set according to manufacturer's recommendations. No sutures required.
Interventions
Conventional gingivectomy performed using a surgical scalpel. Gingival overgrowth was excised using standard surgical technique under local anesthesia.
Gingivectomy performed using a diode laser. Laser parameters were set according to manufacturer's recommendations. No sutures required.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants aged 18 years or older who agree to take part in the study.
- Individuals in good general health with no history of systemic diseases.
- Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment with metallic brackets for at least 6 months and presenting with gingival enlargement.
- Patients with good oral hygiene (Plaque Index \[PlI\] \< 1) and who comply with the instructions provided by the dentist during the treatment period.
You may not qualify if:
- History of using medications associated with gingival enlargement, such as anticonvulsants, immunosuppressants, or calcium channel blockers (e.g., phenytoin, cyclosporine, nifedipine, verapamil, diltiazem, felodipine, nitredipine, etc.).
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or individuals using hormonal therapy.
- Patients who have undergone periodontal treatment within the last 6 months.
- Use of antibiotics within 3 months prior to study enrollment.
- Presence or history of systemic diseases.
- Patients who refuse the use of laser in treatment.
- Patients who are uncooperative, have poor oral hygiene (PlI \> 1), discontinue participation during the study, or fail to follow instructions throughout the study period.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Nguyen Thu Thuylead
Study Sites (1)
University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City - Faculty of Odonto-Stomatology
Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, 700000, Vietnam
Related Publications (8)
Newman MG, Takei H, Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA. Newman and Carranza's Clinical Periodontology and Implantology. 14th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier / Saunders; 2023.
RESULTSILNESS J, LOE H. PERIODONTAL DISEASE IN PREGNANCY. II. CORRELATION BETWEEN ORAL HYGIENE AND PERIODONTAL CONDTION. Acta Odontol Scand. 1964 Feb;22:121-35. doi: 10.3109/00016356408993968. No abstract available.
PMID: 14158464RESULTKrishnan V, Ambili R, Davidovitch Z, Murphy NC. Gingiva and Orthodontic Treatment. Semin Orthod. 2007;13(4):257-271. doi:10.1053/j.sodo.2007.08.007.
RESULTFornaini C, Rocca JP, Bertrand MF, Merigo E, Nammour S, Vescovi P. Nd:YAG and diode laser in the surgical management of soft tissues related to orthodontic treatment. Photomed Laser Surg. 2007 Oct;25(5):381-92. doi: 10.1089/pho.2006.2068.
PMID: 17975951RESULTMaboudi A, Fekrazad R, Shiva A, Salehabadi N, Moosazadeh M, Ehsani H, Yazdani O. Gingivectomy with Diode Laser Versus the Conventional Scalpel Surgery and Nonsurgical Periodontal Therapy in Treatment of Orthodontic Treatment-Induced Gingival Enlargement: A Systematic Review. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2023 Sep;41(9):449-459. doi: 10.1089/photob.2023.0060.
PMID: 37738371RESULTLione R, Pavoni C, Noviello A, Clementini M, Danesi C, Cozza P. Conventional versus laser gingivectomy in the management of gingival enlargement during orthodontic treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2020 Jan 27;42(1):78-85. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz032.
PMID: 31111882RESULTZanatta FB, Ardenghi TM, Antoniazzi RP, Pinto TM, Rosing CK. Association between gingival bleeding and gingival enlargement and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of subjects under fixed orthodontic treatment: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2012 Nov 27;12:53. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-12-53.
PMID: 23186371RESULTGong Y, Lu J, Ding X. Clinical, microbiologic, and immunologic factors of orthodontic treatment-induced gingival enlargement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Jul;140(1):58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.033.
PMID: 21724088RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thi Hong Nhung Nguyen
University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Due to the nature of the interventions, masking of participants and operators was not feasible. Outcome assessors were blinded to the type of intervention performed at each site.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor - PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2025
First Posted
December 4, 2025
Study Start
August 1, 2024
Primary Completion
February 15, 2025
Study Completion
February 15, 2025
Last Updated
December 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the study is conducted as part of a postgraduate thesis with a limited scope and without a formal data sharing agreement.