Wound Assessment Accuracy and Treatment Efficiency

NCT07261488 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: Long2025-WC-wound assessment
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 553
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Wound assessment is critical for developing effective treatment strategies, yet there is a scarcity of research on the assessment accuracy of clinical practitioners. An online questionnaire-based survey was conducted from March to April 2025. It involved 118 wound specialists from 9 specialized wound care institutions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China, who evaluated 8 standardized wound cases. A total of 553 valid responses were collected.

Conditions

Wound - in Medical Care

Keywords

Wound Assessment; Wound healing; Accuracy; Efficacy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• The weighted overall accuracy of wound assessments

  Compare the assessment answers given by wound specialist to determine the accuracy rate of the assessment of the wound practitioners surveyed

  Baseline

Secondary Outcomes (2)

• The average accuracy for observational assessment items (e.g., wound size, types of wound bed tissue, wound exudate)

  Baseline

• The average the accuracy of inferential assessment items (e.g., etiologic classification of wounds, healing capacity, wound characteristic analysis)

  Baseline

Study Arms (1)

wound care group

It involved 118 wound specialists from 9 specialized wound care institutions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China

Eligibility Criteria

• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

A total of 553 valid responses were collected

You may qualify if:

• being a wound therapist, specialized nurse, or physician in relevant departments;
• having completed systematic specialized wound training (provided by, but not limited to, EWMA, ICW, ET, the Chinese Nursing Association, the Wound Baihui online education platform, or other medical institutions)

You may not qualify if:

• Not applicable

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Peking University Third Hospital: lead

Study Sites (1)

Peking University Third Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191, China

Location

Related Publications (2)

• Samaniego-Ruiz MJ, Llatas FP, Jimenez OS. Assessment of chronic wounds in adults: an integrative review. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2018 Jun 25;52:e03315. doi: 10.1590/S1980-220X2016050903315. English, Spanish.

  PMID: 29947700 RESULT

• Koschwanez HE, Broadbent E. The use of wound healing assessment methods in psychological studies: a review and recommendations. Br J Health Psychol. 2011 Feb;16(Pt 1):1-32. doi: 10.1348/135910710X524633.

  PMID: 21226781 RESULT

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: ECOLOGIC OR COMMUNITY
• Time Perspective: CROSS SECTIONAL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Head of Wound Healing Center

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: October 1, 2025
• First Posted: December 3, 2025
• Study Start: March 1, 2025
• Primary Completion: April 30, 2025
• Study Completion: October 1, 2025
• Last Updated: December 3, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Locations

CN (1)