Paired Comparison of SVV and PVI Accuracy
Diagnostic Accuracy of Stroke Volume Variation (SVV) vs Pleth Variability Index (PVI) for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Laparoscopic Major Abdominal Surgery-A Prospective, Paired, Cohort Study
1 other identifier
observational
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will compare two operating-room monitors-stroke volume variation (SVV, from the arterial line) and the Pleth Variability Index (PVI, from the pulse oximeter)-to see which one more accurately predicts whether giving a small fluid bolus will improve the heart's pumping during laparoscopic major abdominal surgery. Adults having elective surgery under general anesthesia will receive two small, timed 250-mL crystalloid infusions as part of routine care (one before and one after creation of the pneumoperitoneum). The research team will record SVV and PVI values just before and three minutes after each infusion while keeping these readings hidden from the clinicians so that usual care is not changed. No experimental drugs or devices are used. The main goal is to learn which index better identifies "fluid responsiveness," so future care can be safer and more consistent. Potential risks are minimal and relate to the small fluid boluses (temporary changes in blood pressure or heart rate); the test stops if the anesthesiologist has any safety concerns. There is no direct benefit to participants, but results may help guide fluid therapy for similar patients in the future. The study is being conducted at a single academic hospital in the Republic of Korea and plans to enroll about 300 adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 13, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 3, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2026
CompletedDecember 29, 2025
December 1, 2025
21 days
November 13, 2025
December 26, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of stroke volume variation (SVV) and Pleth Variability Index (PVI) for predicting fluid responsiveness to a 250-mL crystalloid bolus
Index tests: pre-bolus SVV (arterial waveform-derived) and PVI (pulse-oximetry-derived). Reference standard: fluid responsiveness defined as a \>=10% increase in stroke volume index measured about 3 minutes after the 250-mL crystalloid bolus using arterial pulse contour analysis. ROC curves will be built for SVV and PVI to discriminate responders vs non-responders; AUROCs will be compared with a paired DeLong test with patient-level clustering. Unit: AUROC (0-1; higher indicates better discrimination).
Intraoperative: from the pre-bolus baseline to ~3 minutes after each standardized 250-mL crystalloid bolus (up to two episodes per participant: before and after pneumoperitoneum).
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Sensitivity of prespecified SVV thresholds for predicting fluid responsiveness
Intraoperative: pre-bolus baseline to about 3 minutes after each 250 mL bolus (up to two boluses).
Specificity of prespecified SVV thresholds for predicting fluid responsiveness
Intraoperative: pre bolus baseline to about 3 minutes after each 250 mL bolus (up to two episodes per participant).
Sensitivity of prespecified PVI threshold for predicting fluid responsiveness
Intraoperative: pre bolus baseline to about 3 minutes after each 250 mL bolus (up to two episodes per participant).
Specificity of prespecified PVI threshold for predicting fluid responsiveness
Intraoperative: pre bolus baseline to about 3 minutes after each 250 mL bolus (up to two episodes per participant).
Optimal cutoffs for SVV using Youden index
Intraoperative: pre bolus to about 3 minutes post bolus.
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Laparoscopic Surgery Cohort
Adults undergoing elective laparoscopic major abdominal surgery under general anesthesia at a single academic hospital. Each participant may receive up to two standardized 250-mL crystalloid fluid challenges (pre- and post-pneumoperitoneum). SVV and PVI are recorded around each bolus; no assignment or experimental treatment.
Interventions
Non-investigational physiologic monitoring. SVV derived from the invasive arterial pressure waveform using a commercially available platform. Used as an index test; values recorded immediately before and \~3 minutes after a standardized 250-mL crystalloid bolus at up to two time points (pre- and post-pneumoperitoneum). Readings are masked to clinicians; operation per usual care.
Non-investigational pulse-oximetry-derived index. PVI obtained from a commercial monitor. Used as a paired index test; values recorded immediately before and \~3 minutes after each 250-mL crystalloid bolus (up to two time points). Readings masked; monitor used within standard care.
Eligibility Criteria
Adults undergoing elective laparoscopic major abdominal surgery at a single academic hospital.
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 years
- ASA physical status I-III
- Elective laparoscopic major abdominal surgery under general anesthesia
- Arterial line in place for clinical care
- Able to provide informed consent
- Arterial and plethysmographic waveforms adequate for measurement
You may not qualify if:
- linically significant arrhythmia (e.g., atrial fibrillation with irregular R-R)
- Severe valvular heart disease or intracardiac shunt
- Pregnancy
- Severe right-heart failure or condition where a fluid bolus is unsafe
- Ongoing hemodynamic instability requiring rapid vasoactive titration at assessment
- Persistently unreliable arterial/pleth signals despite optimization
- Any situation the anesthesiologist judges that the fluid challenge is unsafe
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Wonkwang University School of Medicine Hospital
Iksan, Jeollabuk-do, 54538, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cheolhyeong Lee, MD, PhD
Wonkwang University School of Medicine Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 13, 2025
First Posted
December 3, 2025
Study Start
October 1, 2025
Primary Completion
October 22, 2025
Study Completion
March 1, 2026
Last Updated
December 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12