NCT07257003

Brief Summary

This study is a nationwide multicenter, single-arm, retrospective study. The study aims to conduct a detailed analysis of operation-related parameters, aesthetic outcomes (e.g., BREAST-Q scores and Harris scores), and safety (e.g., surgical complication rates) in delayed endoscopic direct-to-implant breast reconstruction via the axillary approach.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable breast-cancer

Timeline
6mo left

Started Dec 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable breast-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress50%
Dec 2025Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 14, 2025

Completed
17 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2025

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 2, 2025

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

December 2, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

November 14, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 27, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Breast CancerEndoscopic surgeryBreast reconstructionMinimal invasive surgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The patient's satisfaction with the breasts

    Satisfaction with the breast of the BREAST-Q scale. The BREAST-Q is commonly used to assess health-related satisfaction and quality of life in patients who have undergone breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Responses for each subscale are scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

    postoperative 6-month

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • The surgical safety

    postoperative 6-month

  • The aesthetic outcomes

    postoperative 6-month

  • The implant-assisted complications

    postoperative 6-month

Study Arms (1)

DEDTI-BR group

EXPERIMENTAL

delayed endoscopic direct-to-implant breast reconstruction via axillary approach after simple mastectomy

Procedure: delayed endoscopic direct-to-implant breast reconstruction via axillary approach after simple mastectomy

Interventions

This technique allows for breast reconstruction in a single operation. Taking dual-plane breast reconstruction as an example, preoperative marking lines are drawn to indicate the contour and inframammary fold of the reconstructed breast. A 4-5 cm axillary incision is placed one finger-breadth below the axillary apex. After making the skin incision, the plane between the pectoralis major and minor muscles is identified and dissected, extending approximately 2 cm below the previous mastectomy horizontal scar. The inner and lower parts of the pectoralis major muscle were then separated. Proceed to the subcutaneous layer and continue to dissociate the flap until it reaches the pre-designed folds and the breast boundary. The use of the TiLOOP® Bra depends on the thickness of the patient's flap. Finally, the prosthesis is placed behind the pectoralis major muscle for breast reconstruction.

DEDTI-BR group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Breast cancer patients who underwent delayed endoscopic direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after simple mastectomy at various centers from July 2024 to August 2025, all delayed endoscopic direct-to-implant breast reconstructions were performed ≥ 6 months after the initial mastectomy.

You may not qualify if:

  • Poor skin elasticity;
  • Re-evaluation (based on clinical, imaging, and pathological findings) indicates local or regional recurrence or uncontrolled distant metastasis;
  • Patients who have previously undergone radical mastectomy;
  • Patients who refused to provide postoperative follow-up information.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

West China hospital of Sichuan University

Chengdu, Sichuan, 610000, China

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Xiu B, Zhang Q, Meng X, Hao S, Yang B, Li J, Shao ZM, Wu J; Chinese Anti-Cancer Association; Committee of Breast Cancer Society. Current practices and challenges of endoscopic-assisted breast surgery in China: A nationwide cross-sectional survey. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2025 May;51(5):109620. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109620. Epub 2025 Jan 19.

    PMID: 39842261BACKGROUND
  • Bennett KG, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Pusic AL, Wilkins EG. Comparison of 2-Year Complication Rates Among Common Techniques for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2018 Oct 1;153(10):901-908. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1687.

    PMID: 29926077BACKGROUND
  • Ren Y, Yu Y, Xu K, Li Z, Wang X. Meta-Analysis of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Autologous Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of PMRT. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 May;48(10):1940-1948. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03430-y. Epub 2023 Jun 28.

    PMID: 37380747BACKGROUND
  • Movassaghi K, Gilson A, Stewart CN, Cusic J, Movassaghi A. Prepectoral Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate for Pocket Control without the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix: A 4-Year Review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Jul 1;154(1):15-24. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010914. Epub 2023 Jul 6.

    PMID: 37410610BACKGROUND
  • Deliere A, Attai D, Victorson D, Kuchta K, Pesce C, Kopkash K, Sisco M, Seth A, Yao K. Patients Undergoing Bilateral Mastectomy and Breast-Conserving Surgery Have the Lowest Levels of Regret: The WhySurg Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(10):5686-5697. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10452-w. Epub 2021 Aug 25.

    PMID: 34432189BACKGROUND
  • Erden Y, Celik HC, Karakurt N. Women's body image after mastectomy: a photovoice study. Support Care Cancer. 2025 May 27;33(6):501. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09541-3.

    PMID: 40423833BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Deputy director. Zhenggui Du

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2025

First Posted

December 2, 2025

Study Start

December 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

December 2, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data via the request portal. All IPD requests should be emailed to Dr. Zhenggui Du, the general project leader, and will be evaluated by Dr. Du and the head of the collaborating organization to decide whether to approve.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
After publication of relevant research outputs, such as academic papers and books.
Access Criteria
When a request has been approved, the investigator will provide access to the de-identified individual patient-level data in the data management platform (Electronic Data Capture, EDC). A signed Data Sharing Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing the requested information. Additionally, all users will need to accept the terms and conditions of the data management platform to gain access.
More information

Locations