Comparison of the Efficacy of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Alone Versus Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Combined With Superior Cluneal and Superior Gluteal Nerve Blocks in Patients Undergoing Hip Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In the clinic, total hip arthroplasty is a frequently performed surgical procedure that often results in moderate to severe postoperative pain. Multimodal analgesia approaches are commonly preferred for managing this pain, and in recent years, nerve blocks targeting pelvic innervation have become increasingly prominent. Among these, the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block has gained attention for providing effective analgesia by targeting the nerves responsible for the anterior innervation of the hip capsule. However, when used alone, the PENG block may be insufficient for controlling posterior hip pain and may not provide complete analgesia. In this context, adding blocks targeting the superior cluneal nerve and the superior gluteal nerve-both of which contribute to the sensory innervation of the posterior hip region-has been proposed to enhance the analgesic effect when combined with the PENG block. Superior cluneal and superior gluteal nerve blocks have recently been described in anatomical and clinical studies, and by affecting the structures contributing sensory input to the posterior hip capsule, they hold significant potential for improving pain management. In this study, the investigators aimed to evaluate the contribution of superior cluneal and superior gluteal nerve blocks, when added to the PENG block, to perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. The investigators sought to comparatively investigate whether this combination offers superior outcomes compared with the PENG block alone. It was hypothesized that combined nerve blocks may provide similar or improved recovery scores, lower pain scores, reduced opioid consumption, and enhanced analgesic efficacy without affecting the degree of motor blockade.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 16, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2026
December 8, 2025
December 1, 2025
11 months
November 16, 2025
December 2, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
QoR-15 (Quality of Recovery-15) questionnaire
The primary outcome measure will be the QoR-15 (Quality of Recovery-15) questionnaire administered at the 24th postoperative hour. QoR-15 is a validated 15-item short survey assessing patients' postoperative physical comfort, emotional state, level of independence, pain control, and overall well-being. The total score obtained will be used to compare the overall quality of recovery between groups. The same questionnaire will be repeated at the 48th postoperative hour.
24th and 48th postoperative hour
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Quadriceps Motor Block Assessment
It will be assessed at the 4th, 8th, 12th, and 24th postoperative hours.
Motor Block Assessment at the Tibialis Anterior Muscle for the Sciatic Nerve
It will be assessed at the 4th, 8th, 12th, and 24th postoperative hours.
Fentanyl consumption
The first 24 postoperative hours
VAS pain scores
The first 24 postoperative hours
Study Arms (2)
Application of PENG Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be brought to the operating room one hour before surgery, and no premedication will be administered prior to their arrival. Before performing the PENG block, patients will be placed in the supine position. The ultrasound probe will be positioned in the transverse plane medial and caudal to the anterior superior iliac spine, and the anterior inferior iliac spine, iliopubic eminence, and psoas tendon will be identified. Using an in-plane technique, the needle will be advanced from lateral to medial and positioned between the psoas tendon and the periosteum. After negative aspiration, 15 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered.
Application of PENG Block together with Superior Cluneal and Superior Gluteal Nerve Blocks
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll patients will receive a PENG block, and in addition: The superior cluneal nerve block will be performed at the level of the posterior iliac crest under ultrasound guidance, along the course of the nerve, using 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. The superior gluteal nerve block will be administered in the lateral decubitus position under ultrasound guidance, with 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine injected between the gluteal muscles along the trajectory of the nerve.
Interventions
For PENG Block, 15 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered.
After performing PENG; 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered for each superior cluneal nerve block and superior gluteal nerve block
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Voluntary participation in the study
- Age between 18 and 80 years
- ASA physical status I, II, or III
- Male or female patients
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to participate in the study
- Allergy to the medications to be used
- History of severe cardiac, renal, or hepatic disease
- Presence of neurological deficits or neuropathy
- History of anticoagulant use
- Previous surgery in the inguinal or suprainguinal region
- Pregnancy
- Chronic opioid use at home
- History of spinal surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ataturk University
Erzurum, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 16, 2025
First Posted
December 1, 2025
Study Start
September 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Last Updated
December 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12