Three Brief Psychological Interventions for Acute Pain in Inpatients in Boyacá
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
4
Brief Summary
This study evaluates two brief, non-drug psychological techniques-body-scan mindfulness and guided imagery/distraction-delivered as a single bedside session to reduce acute pain in adults admitted to short-stay inpatient wards or emergency observation units in Boyacá, Colombia. Participants are randomly assigned (1:1:1) to body-scan mindfulness, guided imagery/distraction, or a brief cognitive-behavioral psychoeducation session (active comparator). Each session lasts under 20 minutes and usual medical care continues. Pain intensity (0-10) is recorded within 5 minutes before the session and within 2 minutes after completion on the same day. If pain remains very high (e.g., ≥8-9/10) or the activity cannot be completed, up to 5 minutes of supervised slow deep-breathing may be offered as rescue, and the clinical team may adjust analgesics per routine care. Secondary measures (specified in Outcome Measures) include patient satisfaction, feasibility (session duration and completion), use of rescue measure, and adverse events; exploratory data may include short-term psychological scales collected by a blinded assessor and the association with length of stay during the current admission. Adults aged ≥18 years with acute pain ≤7 days and baseline pain ≥4/10 may be eligible. The study takes place across four public hospitals in Boyacá, Colombia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 28, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 16, 2026
November 28, 2025
November 1, 2025
12 months
November 14, 2025
November 19, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in acute pain intensity (0-10 Pain Thermometer) from pre- to post-session
Patient-reported Pain Thermometer adapted from VAS/NRS; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate more pain. Change score = post-session minus pre-session (negative values indicate pain reduction).
Two assessments on the same calendar day: ≤5 minutes before session start and ≤2 minutes after session end.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Patient satisfaction with the session
One assessment ≤5 minutes after session end (same calendar day).
Participants requiring protocolized rescue slow deep-breathing
From session start until ≤10 minutes after session end (same calendar day).
Pain Self-Efficacy (PSEQ-10) - change from pre- to post-session
One assessment 5-10 minutes after session end (same calendar day).
Pain Catastrophizing (PCS) - change from pre- to post-session
One assessment 5-10 minutes after session end (same calendar day).
Hospital Anxiety (HADS-A) - change from pre-session to post-session
One assessment 5-10 minutes after session end (same calendar day).
Other Outcomes (1)
Days hospitalized immediately before the session (pre-session length of stay)
Calculated on the day of the intervention, from index hospital admission/observation start to session start for the same hospitalization; assessed for admissions up to 30 days prior to the session.
Study Arms (3)
Guided Imagery (B)
EXPERIMENTALSingle, bedside session (\~15-20 min) of therapist-guided guided imagery that redirects attention from pain toward neutral or pleasant sensory images and simple attentional shifts. Delivered seated or semi-reclined in addition to usual care. Pain is rated immediately before and after the session (0-10). A protocolized slow deep-breathing rescue (≤5 min) may be offered if pain remains very high or the technique cannot be completed.
Body-Scan Mindfulness (A)
EXPERIMENTALSingle, bedside body-scan mindfulness session (\~12-20 min) guiding non-judgmental attention sequentially through body areas, including sites without pain, to foster an open, accepting stance toward the pain experience. Delivered seated or semi-reclined with usual care continuing. Pain is rated immediately before and after (0-10). Rescue slow deep-breathing (≤5 min) may be used if needed.
CBT-Based Psychoeducation (ABC Model) (C)
ACTIVE COMPARATORBrief, structured explanation of the ABC cognitive-behavioral model applied to pain (\~10-15 min) using a practical example; no skills training or practice. Serves as an active comparator controlling for time and attention. After the immediate post-session pain assessment, participants in this arm receive one of the two techniques (body-scan mindfulness or guided imagery) during the same visit (equity measure). Rescue slow deep-breathing (≤5 min) available per protocol.
Interventions
Single, bedside session (\~15-20 minutes) of therapist-guided guided imagery/distraction that redirects attention from pain toward neutral or pleasant sensory images and simple attentional shifts. Seated or semi-reclined, conversational and supportive, in addition to usual care. Pain is rated immediately before and after the session (0-10).
Single, bedside body-scan mindfulness session (\~12-20 minutes) guiding non-judgmental attention sequentially through body areas-including regions without pain-to cultivate an open, accepting stance toward pain. Delivered seated or semi-reclined with usual care continuing. Pain is rated immediately before and after (0-10).
Brief, structured explanation of the ABC cognitive-behavioral model (thoughts-emotions-behaviors) applied to pain (\~10-15 minutes) using a practical example; no skills training or practice. Serves as an active comparator controlling for time and attention. After the immediate post-session pain assessment, participants in this arm receive one of the two techniques (body-scan mindfulness or guided imagery) during the same visit (equity measure).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 years.
- Admitted to short-stay inpatient or emergency observation units at participating hospitals (same index admission).
- Acute pain ≤7 days with baseline pain ≥4/10 on a 0-10 numeric/visual scale.
- Clinically stable and able to remain at bedside for \~30-40 minutes (consent, baseline, single session, post-session assessment).
- Analgesic regimen stable ≥1 hour before baseline pain rating (no planned change during the \~20-minute study window unless clinically required).
- Able to understand simple instructions and communicate pain ratings (verbal or pointing) and to provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Cancer-related pain or chronic pain \>6 months (e.g., widespread musculoskeletal pain/fibromyalgia).
- Active inflammatory/degenerative rheumatic disease causing ongoing daily pain that would confound acute pain ratings (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis flare, advanced osteoarthritis, severe osteoporosis-related pain).
- Cognitive impairment/dementia, delirium, or acute severe psychiatric disturbance that prevents consent or reliable self-report.
- Respiratory conditions that contraindicate slow deep-breathing rescue (e.g., decompensated COPD, acute asthma, need for high-flow oxygen or ventilatory support).
- Hemodynamic or clinical instability (e.g., need for urgent procedure; in resuscitation/reanimation area; RASS ≤ -3; MAP \<65 mmHg or SBP \<90 mmHg; SpO₂ \<90% despite usual oxygen) at screening.
- Participation in another interventional study targeting pain during the same admission.
- Refusal to participate or withdrawal of consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombialead
- ESE Hospital Regional de Sogamosocollaborator
- ESE Hospital Santa Marta de Samacácollaborator
- ESE Santiago de Tunjacollaborator
- ESE Hospital Regional de Chiquinquirácollaborator
Study Sites (4)
ESE Hospital Regional de Chiquinquirá
Chiquinquirá, Departamento de Boyacá, 154640, Colombia
ESE Hospital Santa Marta de Samacá
Samacá, Departamento de Boyacá, 153660, Colombia
ESE Hospital Regional de Sogamoso
Sogamoso, Departamento de Boyacá, 152210, Colombia
ESE Santiago de Tunja
Tunja, Departamento de Boyacá, 150001, Colombia
Related Publications (12)
Sun JN, Chen W, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Feng S, Chen XY. Does cognitive behavioral education reduce pain and improve joint function in patients after total knee arthroplasty? A randomized controlled trial. Int Orthop. 2020 Oct;44(10):2027-2035. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04767-8. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
PMID: 32772319BACKGROUNDMiller-Matero LR, Coleman JP, Smith-Mason CE, Moore DA, Marszalek D, Ahmedani BK. A Brief Mindfulness Intervention for Medically Hospitalized Patients with Acute Pain: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. Pain Med. 2019 Nov 1;20(11):2149-2154. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz082.
PMID: 31329961BACKGROUNDManiaci G, Daino M, Iapichino M, Giammanco A, Taormina C, Bonura G, Sardella Z, Carolla G, Cammareri P, Sberna E, Clesi MF, Ferraro L, Gambino CM, Ciaccio M, Rispoli L, La Cascia C, La Barbera D, Quattrone D. Neurobiological and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of a Deep Diaphragmatic Breathing Technique Based on Neofunctional Psychotherapy: A Pilot RCT. Stress Health. 2024 Dec;40(6):e3503. doi: 10.1002/smi.3503. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
PMID: 39543797BACKGROUNDJoseph AE, Moman RN, Barman RA, Kleppel DJ, Eberhart ND, Gerberi DJ, Murad MH, Hooten WM. Effects of Slow Deep Breathing on Acute Clinical Pain in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Evid Based Integr Med. 2022 Jan-Dec;27:2515690X221078006. doi: 10.1177/2515690X221078006.
PMID: 35225720BACKGROUNDJafari H, Gholamrezaei A, Franssen M, Van Oudenhove L, Aziz Q, Van den Bergh O, Vlaeyen JWS, Van Diest I. Can Slow Deep Breathing Reduce Pain? An Experimental Study Exploring Mechanisms. J Pain. 2020 Sep-Oct;21(9-10):1018-1030. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.12.010. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
PMID: 31978501BACKGROUNDHanley AW, Gililland J, Garland EL. To be mindful of the breath or pain: Comparing two brief preoperative mindfulness techniques for total joint arthroplasty patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 Jul;89(7):590-600. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000657. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
PMID: 34165999BACKGROUNDGarcia-Galicia A, Diaz-Diaz JF, Montiel-Jarquin AJ, Gonzalez-Lopez AM, Vazquez-Cruz E, Morales-Flores CF. Validity and consistency of an outpatient department user satisfaction rapid scale. Gac Med Mex. 2020;156(1):47-52. doi: 10.24875/GMM.19005144.
PMID: 32026871BACKGROUNDFerrer-Pena R, Gil-Martinez A, Pardo-Montero J, Jimenez-Penick V, Gallego-Izquierdo T, La Touche R. Adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the graded chronic pain scale. Reumatol Clin. 2016 May-Jun;12(3):130-8. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Aug 19. English, Spanish.
PMID: 26298083BACKGROUNDDilek B, Ayhan C, Yagci G, Yakut Y. Effectiveness of the graded motor imagery to improve hand function in patients with distal radius fracture: A randomized controlled trial. J Hand Ther. 2018 Jan-Mar;31(1):2-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
PMID: 29122370BACKGROUNDDelgado DA, Lambert BS, Boutris N, McCulloch PC, Robbins AB, Moreno MR, Harris JD. Validation of Digital Visual Analog Scale Pain Scoring With a Traditional Paper-based Visual Analog Scale in Adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Mar 23;2(3):e088. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00088. eCollection 2018 Mar.
PMID: 30211382BACKGROUNDDarnall BD, Abshire L, Courtney RE, Davin S. Upskilling pain relief after surgery: a scoping review of perioperative behavioral intervention efficacy and practical considerations for implementation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Feb 5;50(2):93-101. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105601.
PMID: 39909552BACKGROUNDBirch S, Stilling M, Mechlenburg I, Hansen TB. No effect of cognitive behavioral patient education for patients with pain catastrophizing before total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Orthop. 2020 Feb;91(1):98-103. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1694312. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
PMID: 31762342BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Single-blind (outcomes assessor). An external evaluator, not present during the intervention and unaware of group assignment (arms labeled A/B/C), administers and scores prespecified secondary outcomes-Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-10), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Hospital Anxiety (HADS-A)-and has no access to baseline scores at the time of assessment. Participants and interventionists are not blinded. The primary outcome (acute pain 0-10) is patient-reported at bedside. Allocation is concealed until assignment (computer-generated variable blocks). Any inadvertent unblinding is documented.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Full-Time Lecturer, School of Psychology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2025
First Posted
November 28, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 15, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 16, 2026
Last Updated
November 28, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
- Time Frame
- Within 12 months after publication of the primary results; available for 24 months thereafter.
- Access Criteria
- Available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author/UPTC data custodian for qualified researchers with a methodologically sound proposal and ethics approval, after signing a Data Use Agreement.
De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the primary outcome will be shared. Direct identifiers will be removed and indirect identifiers minimized in accordance with Colombian data protection law and IRB approvals.