Preventing Diabetes: Impact of an EMR-Based Intervention for Enhanced Pre-Diabetes Management in Primary Care
1 other identifier
interventional
6,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to find out if adding electronic medical record (EMR) prompts helps prevent people with pre-diabetes from developing diabetes. It will also look at how these prompts affect doctor and patient behaviors. The main questions are: Does it improve follow-up care, such as blood tests, referrals, and medication? Does the EMR prompt reduce the number of patients who progress to diabetes within six months? Researchers will compare clinics that use EMR prompts with clinics that do not. Participants will: Receive usual care for pre-diabetes at their polyclinic In some clinics, doctors will see EMR prompts suggesting tests, referrals, and medication Complete surveys about their health and lifestyle at different time points
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 28, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2028
January 14, 2026
January 1, 2026
2.3 years
November 18, 2025
January 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Guideline-concordant prediabetes care
The primary outcome of this study is the proportion of patients receiving guideline-concordant prediabetes care within 6 months of the index consultation, defined as the first prediabetes consultation during the study period at which patient meets eligibility criteria for prediabetes. 1. HbA1c test ordered and recorded in the EMR. 2. Referral to a dietitian or structured lifestyle programme placed and recorded in the EMR. 3. Follow-up visit ordered by the attending clinician. 4. Metformin prescription recorded in the EMR for eligible patients (HbA1c ≥ 6.5%). Scale: Guideline-concordant care is defined as a composite measure in which patients have at least two of the following four clinician-initiated care processes captured in EMR data: Method: EMR data extracted from the Epic system, including laboratory orders, referrals, visit scheduling, and medication prescriptions.
From enrollment to the end of intervention period at 24 months. collected at baseline, 6 months, 12, months, 18 months and 24 months.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Progression to Diabetes
Up to 24 months after index consultation
Patient health activation
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months.
Clinician perceptions and satisfaction with the EMR-based intervention
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Study Arms (2)
EMR-Based Intervention - Practice advisories (OPA) in electronic medical records (EMR)
ACTIVE COMPARATORTo implement a non-intrusive OPA in EMR (Epic) to appear in the OPA section of the Visit Navigator in Epic that will be triggered for patients with prediabetes to remind clinicians to fulfil the clinical workflow for managing patients with prediabetes
Comparison Group
NO INTERVENTIONControl clinics continue to use the clinical workflow without EMR-based OPAs, representing usual care.
Interventions
A non-intrusive OurPractice Advisories (OPA) will be implemented in the Epic EMR system. The OPA will appear in the Visit Navigator and will be automatically triggered for patients with pre-diabetes. It will provide clinicians with reminders and decision-support options to complete the recommended clinical workflow for pre-diabetes management, including referrals, follow-up scheduling, HbA1c testing, and medication initiation when indicated.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All adults aged 21 to 59 years with prediabetes who attend any of the eight participating polyclinics during the study period will be included in the EMR-based analytic cohort.
- Prediabetes is defined as impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance according to standard clinical criteria, with either diagnosis documented in the EMR problem list or visit diagnosis.
- Individuals with a prior diagnosis of diabetes will be excluded.
- Adults aged 40-59 years
- Diagnosed with prediabetes (impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance)
- Receiving routine follow-up care at NUP polyclinics
- Able to provide written informed consent
- Able to complete questionnaires in English
You may not qualify if:
- Prior diagnosis of diabetes mellitus or gestational diabetes
- Severe acute or chronic liver or kidney disease
- Pregnancy
- Cognitive impairment
- Inability to communicate in English
- All clinicians that consult patients in National University Polyclinics
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Lynette Gohlead
- National University Health System, Singaporecollaborator
- National University of Singaporecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
National University Polyclinics, Singapore
Singapore, 643664, Singapore
Related Publications (19)
Wolf MS, Smith SG, Pandit AU, Condon DM, Curtis LM, Griffith J, O'Conor R, Rush S, Bailey SC, Kaplan G, Haufle V, Martin D. Development and Validation of the Consumer Health Activation Index. Med Decis Making. 2018 Apr;38(3):334-343. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17753392. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
PMID: 29436308BACKGROUNDGoh SY, Ang SB, Bee YM, Chen YT, Gardner DS, Ho ET, Adaikan K, Lee YC, Lee CH, Lim FS, Lim HB, Lim SC, Seow J, Soh AW, Sum CF, Tai ES, Thai AC, Wong TY, Yap F. Ministry of Health Clinical Practice Guidelines: Diabetes Mellitus. Singapore Med J. 2014 Jun;55(6):334-47. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2014079.
PMID: 25017409BACKGROUNDShuyu Ng C, Toh MP, Ko Y, Yu-Chia Lee J. Direct medical cost of type 2 diabetes in singapore. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 27;10(3):e0122795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122795. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 25816299BACKGROUNDAng YG, WU CX, Toh MP, Chia KS, Heng BH. Progression rate of newly diagnosed impaired fasting glycemia to type 2 diabetes mellitus: a study using the National Healthcare Group Diabetes Registry in Singapore. J Diabetes. 2012 Jun;4(2):159-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-0407.2011.00169.x.
PMID: 22059651BACKGROUNDTomic D, Shaw JE, Magliano DJ. The burden and risks of emerging complications of diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2022 Sep;18(9):525-539. doi: 10.1038/s41574-022-00690-7. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
PMID: 35668219BACKGROUNDSaito T, Watanabe M, Nishida J, Izumi T, Omura M, Takagi T, Fukunaga R, Bandai Y, Tajima N, Nakamura Y, Ito M; Zensharen Study for Prevention of Lifestyle Diseases Group. Lifestyle modification and prevention of type 2 diabetes in overweight Japanese with impaired fasting glucose levels: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Aug 8;171(15):1352-60. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.275.
PMID: 21824948BACKGROUNDKeck JW, Roper KL, Hieronymus LB, Thomas AR, Huang Z, Westgate PM, Fowlkes JL, Cardarelli R. Primary Care Cluster RCT to Increase Diabetes Prevention Program Referrals. Am J Prev Med. 2020 Jul;59(1):79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 May 14.
PMID: 32418801BACKGROUNDJiang Q, Li JT, Sun P, Wang LL, Sun LZ, Pang SG. Effects of lifestyle interventions on glucose regulation and diabetes risk in adults with impaired glucose tolerance or prediabetes: a meta-analysis. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Apr 28;66(2):157-167. doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000441. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
PMID: 35289514BACKGROUNDLi G, Zhang P, Wang J, Gregg EW, Yang W, Gong Q, Li H, Li H, Jiang Y, An Y, Shuai Y, Zhang B, Zhang J, Thompson TJ, Gerzoff RB, Roglic G, Hu Y, Bennett PH. The long-term effect of lifestyle interventions to prevent diabetes in the China Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study: a 20-year follow-up study. Lancet. 2008 May 24;371(9626):1783-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60766-7.
PMID: 18502303BACKGROUNDRamachandran A, Snehalatha C, Mary S, Mukesh B, Bhaskar AD, Vijay V; Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme (IDPP). The Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme shows that lifestyle modification and metformin prevent type 2 diabetes in Asian Indian subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IDPP-1). Diabetologia. 2006 Feb;49(2):289-97. doi: 10.1007/s00125-005-0097-z. Epub 2006 Jan 4.
PMID: 16391903BACKGROUNDLim RBT, Wee WK, For WC, Ananthanarayanan JA, Soh YH, Goh LML, Tham DKT, Wong ML. Health education and communication needs among primary care patients with prediabetes in Singapore: A mixed methods approach. Prim Care Diabetes. 2020 Jun;14(3):254-264. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
PMID: 31558372BACKGROUNDCheah MH, Goh LH, Zheng RM, Burkill S, Young DYL. Prediabetes guidelines adherence and health outcomes at a Singapore primary health care institution. Singapore Med J. 2024 Jan 8. doi: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2021-220. Online ahead of print. No abstract available.
PMID: 38189477BACKGROUNDHolliday CS, Williams J, Salcedo V, Kandula NR. Clinical Identification and Referral of Adults With Prediabetes to a Diabetes Prevention Program. Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Jun 27;16:E82. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180540.
PMID: 31255186BACKGROUNDLessing SE, Hayman LL. Diabetes Care and Management Using Electronic Medical Records: A Systematic Review. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Jul;13(4):774-782. doi: 10.1177/1932296818815507. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
PMID: 30556418BACKGROUNDO'Connor PJ, Crain AL, Rush WA, Sperl-Hillen JM, Gutenkauf JJ, Duncan JE. Impact of an electronic medical record on diabetes quality of care. Ann Fam Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;3(4):300-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.327.
PMID: 16046561BACKGROUNDKnowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, Nathan DM; Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 7;346(6):393-403. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012512.
PMID: 11832527BACKGROUNDMeigs JB, Cagliero E, Dubey A, Murphy-Sheehy P, Gildesgame C, Chueh H, Barry MJ, Singer DE, Nathan DM. A controlled trial of web-based diabetes disease management: the MGH diabetes primary care improvement project. Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):750-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.750.
PMID: 12610033BACKGROUNDGerstein HC, Santaguida P, Raina P, Morrison KM, Balion C, Hunt D, Yazdi H, Booker L. Annual incidence and relative risk of diabetes in people with various categories of dysglycemia: a systematic overview and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007 Dec;78(3):305-12. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2007.05.004. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
PMID: 17601626BACKGROUNDPhan TP, Alkema L, Tai ES, Tan KH, Yang Q, Lim WY, Teo YY, Cheng CY, Wang X, Wong TY, Chia KS, Cook AR. Forecasting the burden of type 2 diabetes in Singapore using a demographic epidemiological model of Singapore. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2014 Jun 11;2(1):e000012. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2013-000012. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25452860BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Principal Dietitian
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2025
First Posted
November 28, 2025
Study Start
September 2, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2028
Last Updated
January 14, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Privacy and Confidentiality: Our study involves some sensitive health information. Even with de-identification, there remains a risk of re-identification, particularly given the detailed nature of our data and the specific population studied. Ethical Constraints: Our informed consent process and ethics approval did not explicitly include provisions for broad data sharing beyond the immediate research team and oversight committees. Regulatory Compliance: Local health data protection regulations place strict limitations on the sharing of individual-level health data, even in anonymized form. However, we are committed to scientific transparency and reproducibility. Therefore, we will make aggregate data, statistical codes, and detailed study protocols available upon reasonable request, subject to approval by our institutional review board and data access committee.