Hemodynamic Effects of Remimazolam vs Propofol During Robot-assisted Gynecologic Surgery
By_HD
A Randomized, Parallel, Open-label With Blinded Assessment Study Comparing Hemodynamic Profiles Between Remimazolam- and Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Robot-assisted Gynecologic Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
58
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This single-center study at CHA Ilsan Medical Center compares intraoperative hemodynamics between remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in patients undergoing robot-assisted gynecologic surgery requiring pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2026
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 26, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 2, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2027
March 27, 2026
March 1, 2026
1.5 years
September 25, 2025
March 23, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
MAP (Time-Weighted Average)
Continuous invasive arterial pressure is recorded throughout anesthesia. For each participant, TWA-MAP is computed as the integral of MAP over elapsed time divided by total observation time (trapezoidal rule). Data are aggregated at \~1-min resolution when possible. Implausible artifacts (e.g., MAP \<30 or \>180 mmHg) are excluded. The primary comparison is the between-group difference in TWA-MAP (remimazolam vs propofol) for validating hypothesis (remimazolam-based TIVA maintains ≥20% higher intraoperative MAP than propofol-based TIVA). Primary analysis will use ANCOVA adjusting for baseline MAP and prespecified covariates, with a one-sided significance level of 0.05.
from induction start (first anesthetic administration) to operating room exit (transfer from OR), approximately up to 5 hours per participant.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Hypertensive Burden
from anesthesia induction to operating room exit, assessed continuously during surgery (approximately 2 to 5 hours per participant).
Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Hypotensive Burden
from anesthesia induction to operating room exit, assessed continuously during surgery (approximately 2 to 5 hours per participant).
Study Arms (2)
Group_R
EXPERIMENTALTIVA with remimazolam plus remifentanil
Group_P
ACTIVE COMPARATORTIVA with propofol plus remifentanil
Interventions
Induction with remimazolam 6 mg·kg-¹·h-¹ with remifentanil Ce 4 ng·mL-¹ (Minto model); maintenance remimazolam 1-2 mg·kg-¹·h-¹, titrated (±0.2) to maintain PSI 25-50 and hemodynamic targets. Standard care otherwise per protocol.
Induction with propofol Ce 4 ng·mL-¹ with remifentanil Ce 4 ng·mL-¹; maintenance propofol Ce 2.5-3.5 ng·mL-¹, titrated (±0.2) to maintain PSI 25-50 and hemodynamic targets. Standard care otherwise per protocol.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female patients \<65 years of age
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II
- Scheduled to undergo robotic hysterectomy under general anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Body mass index (BMI) \> 35 kg/m²
- Baseline hypotension (systolic blood pressure \<100 mmHg) or bradycardia (heart rate \<60 bpm)
- History of ischemic heart disease or cardiac conduction block
- Significant cardiopulmonary disease, including hypoxemia (SpO₂ \<90%), uncontrolled asthma, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
- Use of inhalational anesthetics during anesthesia
- Conversion from robotic/laparoscopic surgery to open laparotomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
CHA Ilsan Medical Center
Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 10414, South Korea
CHA Ilsan Medical Center
Goyang-si, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Joohyun Lee Assistant Professor, Dept. of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, MD
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, CHA University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 25, 2025
First Posted
November 26, 2025
Study Start
May 2, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2027
Last Updated
March 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared. Summary results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific meetings.