Motor Evoked Potential and Cortical Silent Period in Migraine
Investigation of Motor Evoked Potential and Cortical Silent Period in Migraine Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to assess the level of inhibitory control in the motor cortex of migraine patients using objective and non-invasive methods. To this end, Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) and Cortical Silence Period (CSP) parameters obtained using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) will be measured and comparisons will be made between migraine patients and healthy controls. Since CSP duration is used specifically in the evaluation of GABA-B-mediated inhibitory mechanisms, it has the potential to directly measure the effect of migraine on cortical inhibition.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 26, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2026
CompletedNovember 28, 2025
November 1, 2025
1 month
November 14, 2025
November 26, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cortical Silent Period (CSP) Duration
CSP duration will be recorded from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle using surface EMG during TMS. CSP reflects GABA-B-mediated cortical inhibitory mechanisms, allowing direct assessment of cortical inhibition in migraine patients compared to healthy controls.
Single session measurement during TMS
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) Amplitude
Single session measurement during TMS
Other Outcomes (2)
Correlation Between Neurophysiological Parameters and Disease Duration
Single session measurement during TMS
Single Motor Unit (SMU) Firing Rate
Single session measurement during TMS
Study Arms (2)
Migraine Patients
EXPERIMENTALAdult participants aged 18-45 with a prior diagnosis of migraine according to IHS criteria. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Surface Electromyography (sEMG) Needle EMG / Single Motor Unit (SMU) Recording
Healthy Controls
SHAM COMPARATORAge- and sex-matched adults without a history of migraine or neurological disorders. They undergo the same sEMG and needle EMG/SMU procedures as the migraine group, but the TMS is sham. Surface Electromyography (sEMG) Needle EMG / Single Motor Unit (SMU) Recording Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) SHAM
Interventions
Non-invasive brain stimulation applied to the primary motor cortex to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEP) and cortical silent periods (CSP). 70 mm figure-of-eight coil used with Magstim 200² Monophasic Stimulator.
Bipolar Ag/AgCl electrodes placed over the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle to record muscle responses to TMS.
Sterile Teflon-coated needle electrodes inserted into the FDI muscle to record activity of individual motor units during TMS and voluntary contractions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-45 years.
- Right-handed individuals.
- Migraine patients: diagnosed according to International Headache Society (IHS) criteria.
- Healthy controls: no history of migraine or other neurological disorders.
- Able and willing to provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- History of epilepsy or other seizure disorders.
- Presence of metal implants, pacemakers, or other contraindications to TMS.
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
- History of significant neurological or psychiatric disorders.
- Use of medications that significantly alter cortical excitability (e.g., antiepileptics, benzodiazepines) in the last 2 weeks.
- Any musculoskeletal condition preventing safe participation in EMG/TMS procedures.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul Gelisim University, Faculty of Dentistry, Translational Dentistry Research Laboratory
Istanbul, Istanbul, 34310, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (5)
Haavik H, Niazi IK, Jochumsen M, Ugincius P, Sebik O, Yilmaz G, Navid MS, Ozyurt MG, Turker KS. Chiropractic spinal manipulation alters TMS induced I-wave excitability and shortens the cortical silent period. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2018 Oct;42:24-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
PMID: 29936314BACKGROUNDOzyurt MG, Haavik H, Nedergaard RW, Topkara B, Senocak BS, Goztepe MB, Niazi IK, Turker KS. Transcranial magnetic stimulation induced early silent period and rebound activity re-examined. PLoS One. 2019 Dec 4;14(12):e0225535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225535. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31800618BACKGROUNDTodd G, Rogasch NC, Turker KS. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and peristimulus frequencygram. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 May;123(5):1002-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.09.019. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
PMID: 22019353BACKGROUNDHaavik, H., Özyurt, M. G., Niazi, I. K., Nedergaard, R. W., Topkara, B., Yilmaz, G., & Türker, K. S. (2018). Re-investigation on the nature and sign of transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced cortical silent period. In 11th Biennial Meeting of the International Motoneuron Society, IBS, 11-14 June 2018, Boulder, CO, USA (pp. 28-29). Article 46 https://motoneuron2018.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/IMS-Poster-Abstracts-2018.pdf
BACKGROUNDKahya MC, Yavuz SU, Turker KS. Cutaneous silent period in human FDI motor units. Exp Brain Res. 2010 Sep;205(4):455-63. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2380-6. Epub 2010 Aug 8.
PMID: 20694723BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kemal Sıtkı Türker, Prof. Dr.
Istanbul Gelisim University, Faculty of Dentistry, Translational Dentistry Research Laboratory
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants and responsible investigators do not know group assignments. Only the technical staff performing TMS and EMG recordings are aware of group allocation.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2025
First Posted
November 26, 2025
Study Start
December 1, 2025
Primary Completion
January 1, 2026
Study Completion
February 1, 2026
Last Updated
November 28, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (EMG and TMS measurements) will not be shared outside of the published study results to protect participant confidentiality and privacy.