Developing a Methodological Framework and a Dissemination Plan for Herb-drug Interactions-related Clinical Practice Guidelines
Study Protocol for Developing a Methodological Framework and a Theory-informed Dissemination Plan for Herb-drug Interactions-related Clinical Practice Guidelines: a Delphi Survey and a Semi-structured Interview Study
1 other identifier
observational
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational study is to develop a methodological framework for clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) related to herb-drug interactions (HDIs). It will also learn barriers and facilitators of disseminating HDI-related CPGs and formulate a dissemination plan. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Participants in the Delphi survey will engage in a consensus development to determine the framework of HDI-related CPGs, including key characteristics and components of this framework.
- Participants in the semi-structured interviews will be interviewed on the following topics: their experiences in searching for evidence and CPGs related to HDIs; barriers and facilitators encountered when obtaining information from existing CPGs; their views on the ideal platform for disseminating HDI-related CPGs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Feb 2026
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2026
March 18, 2026
August 1, 2025
4 months
November 17, 2025
March 16, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Degree of consensus
The level of agreement for all statements achieving consensus among the expert panel. This study sets the consistency threshold at 75%. Namely, if more than 75% of participants select either "Relevant" or "Highly relevant", the item will be considered to have reached consensus for inclusion in the final framework. Conversely, if more than 75% of participants select either "Highly irrelevant" or "Irrelevant", the item will be considered to have reached consensus for exclusion. Items that do not meet either criterion will be considered as failing to reach consensus and be carried forward to the next round.
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Experiences in searching for clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) related to herb-drug interactions (HDIs); barriers and facilitators encountered during retrieving process; views on the ideal platform for disseminating HDI-related CPGs and the framework
The primary outcome will be assessed by asking participants about the sources they refer to for recommendations on HDIs; what barriers or facilitators they encountered when retrieving HDI-related CPGs; what factors will promote or hinder the development of HDI-related CPGs or the CPG dissemination platform; what anticipated benefits or potential traps the development of the CPG dissemination platform might bring; and the target audience, ideal dissemination channels, etc.
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Delphi Panel
The expert panel with the following backgrounds will be invited to participate in the Delphi survey: a. registered Chinese medicine practitioners, herbalists, or researchers in the field of integrated Chinese and Western medicine; b. physicians providing care in integrated Chinese and Western medicine settings; c. healthcare administrators or policymakers from clinics/hospitals directly involved in developing or reviewing clinical practice guidelines related to integrated Chinese and Western medicine.
Participants of semi-structured interview
Experts with the following backgrounds will be invited to participate in the semi-structured interview: a. registered Chinese medicine practitioners, herbalists, or researchers in the field of integrated Chinese and Western medicine; b. physicians providing care in integrated Chinese and Western medicine settings; c. healthcare administrators or policymakers from clinics/hospitals directly involved in developing or reviewing clinical practice guidelines related to integrated Chinese and Western medicine.
Interventions
The Delphi survey intervention will comprise two rounds of structured questionnaire surveys to gather stakeholder consensus on the factors and components to consider when translating herb-drug interactions' evidence into recommendations. Following the first round of surveys, we will calculate the median score and interquartile range for each consideration factor, expressing participant consensus on these factors as percentages. Consideration factors achieving consensus in the first round will be considered for inclusion in the clinical practice guideline development framework. For factors where consensus was not reached, we will summarize relevant opinions and further evaluate them in the second round of the Delphi survey. Finally, descriptive statistics (frequencies and proportions) will be used to summarize the quantitative results of the Delphi survey.
A face-to-face semi-structured interview with participants will be conducted. Interview questions will be developed based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). The interview will cover three main aspects: a. participants' experiences in searching for evidence and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) related to herb-drug interactions (HDIs); b. barriers and facilitators encountered when retrieving HDI-related CPGs or obtaining information from existing CPGs; c. their views on the ideal platform for disseminating HDI-related CPGs.
Eligibility Criteria
The study population encompass a diverse group of experts, including registered Chinese medicine practitioners, herbalists, or researchers; clinicians; and healthcare administrators or policymakers in the field of integrated Chinese and Western medicine. This expert panel aims to gather a broad range of perspectives to ensure the establishment of a comprehensive and standardized framework for developing guidelines on herb-drug interactions.
You may qualify if:
- Registered Chinese medicine practitioners, herbalists, or researchers in the field of integrated Chinese and Western medicine;
- or physicians providing care in integrated Chinese and Western medicine settings;
- or healthcare administrators or policymakers from clinics/hospitals directly involved in developing or reviewing clinical practice guidelines related to integrated Chinese and Western medicine.
You may not qualify if:
- Panelists who are unable to commit to participating in all rounds of the Delphi process;
- or panelists who are unable to complete the online questionnaire in either Chinese or English;
- or panelists who are unable to conduct the interview in either English or Cantonese.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Chinese Medicine Hospital, Hong Kong Baptist Universitycollaborator
- Hong Kong Poison Control Center, Hospital Authoritycollaborator
- Chinese Medicine Development Fundcollaborator
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centercollaborator
- Chinese University of Hong Konglead
Study Sites (1)
School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Related Publications (5)
Lam CS, Koon HK, Ma CT, Au KY, Zuo Z, Chung VC, Cheung YT. Real-world data on herb-drug interactions in oncology: A scoping review of pharmacoepidemiological studies. Phytomedicine. 2022 Aug;103:154247. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154247. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
PMID: 35716539BACKGROUNDFugh-Berman A. Herb-drug interactions. Lancet. 2000 Jan 8;355(9198):134-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)06457-0.
PMID: 10675182BACKGROUNDWong CHL, Wu IXY, Adams J, Steel A, Wardle J, Wu JCY, Leung TH, Chung VCH. Development of Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine Clinical Service Recommendations for Cancer Palliative Care Using Delphi Approach Based on the Evidence to Decision Framework. Integr Cancer Ther. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1534735420940418. doi: 10.1177/1534735420940418.
PMID: 32646246BACKGROUNDZuo Z, Huang M, Kanfer I, Chow MS, Cho WC. Herb-drug interactions: systematic review, mechanisms, and therapies. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:239150. doi: 10.1155/2015/239150. Epub 2015 Feb 22. No abstract available.
PMID: 25792995BACKGROUNDBush TM, Rayburn KS, Holloway SW, Sanchez-Yamamoto DS, Allen BL, Lam T, So BK, Tran de H, Greyber ER, Kantor S, Roth LW. Adverse interactions between herbal and dietary substances and prescription medications: a clinical survey. Altern Ther Health Med. 2007 Mar-Apr;13(2):30-5.
PMID: 17405676BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Year
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2025
First Posted
November 25, 2025
Study Start
February 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Last Updated
March 18, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-08