Pain, Fear of Movement, Neck Awareness and Upper Extremity Functionality in Chronic Neck Pain
Investigation of Parameters Related to Pain Catastrophizing, Fear of Movement, Neck Awareness and Upper Extremity Functionality in Individuals With Chronic Neck Pain - a Cross-sectional Study
1 other identifier
observational
114
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Our study aims to investigate the parameters related to pain catastrophizing, fear of movement, neck awareness and upper extremity functionality in individuals with chronic neck pain - a cross-sectional study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jul 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 20, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 20, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 25, 2025
CompletedNovember 25, 2025
November 1, 2025
1 month
November 17, 2025
November 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Pain Catastrophizing
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCAT) will be used to assess pain catastrophizing. The PCAT, whose Turkish reliability and validity were established by Uğurlu et al., includes 13 situations describing different feelings and thoughts related to pain. Each situation is scored from 0 (never) to 4 (always). The total score ranges from 0 to 52 points. A higher total score indicates increased pain catastrophizing. According to the scale, individuals scoring 30 or higher are considered to have pain catastrophizing
through study completion, an average of 3 months
Kinesiophobia
The Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale was used to assess fear of movement. The questionnaire, which will be used to measure individuals' perspectives on movement and their fear aspects, consists of 17 questions with total scores ranging from 17 to 68. Tampa scores greater than 37 indicate significant kinesiophobia.
through study completion, an average of 3 months
Neck awareness
The Fremantle Neck Awareness Questionnaire was used to assess neck awareness. It is a simple Likert-type questionnaire (0 = I never feel like this, 1 = I rarely feel like this, 2 = I sometimes or some of the time feel like this, 3 = I often feel like this, 4 = I always or most of the time feel like this) that assesses individual perception. The questionnaire asks nine questions, including how individuals perceive their neck relative to their body and how they perceive their body position. A high score indicates poor awareness.
through study completion, an average of 3 months
Upper extremity function
The Quick Questionnaire for Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Q-DASH) was used to assess individuals' upper extremity function. This 30-question questionnaire assesses an individual's ability to perform functional activities (21 items), pain (5 items), and psychosocial aspects of the disease (4 items). The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
through study completion, an average of 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The pain
through study completion, an average of 3 months
The pain
through study completion, an average of 3 months
Study Arms (1)
Chronic neck pain group
Questionnaires to assess pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, neck awareness, and upper extremity functionality were administered to individuals with chronic neck pain.
Eligibility Criteria
Individuals who met the inclusion criteria and volunteered to participate in the study were administered the relevant assessment scales, which took approximately 30 minutes. No harmful practices or questions were posed to any participants during the study.
You may qualify if:
- Individuals who have had neck pain for 3 months or longer
- Those with no neurological findings
- Those who agree to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals with a history of fractures
- Those who have had cervical surgery
- Individuals who provide incomplete data
- Individuals who are inadequately literate in Turkish
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hasan Kalyoncu University
Gaziantep, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (5)
Candeniz S, Citaker S, Bakirarar B. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck OutcOme Score. Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Dec 16;49(6):1707-1714. doi: 10.3906/sag-1907-87.
PMID: 31655517RESULTYakut Y, Yakut E, Bayar K, Uygur F. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version short-form McGill pain questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Jul;26(7):1083-7. doi: 10.1007/s10067-006-0452-6. Epub 2006 Nov 15.
PMID: 17106618RESULTLundwall A, Ryman A, Bjarnegard Sellius A, Mannerkorpi K. Pain requires processing - How the experience of pain is influenced by Basic Body Awareness Therapy in patients with long-term pain. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019 Oct;23(4):701-707. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
PMID: 31733750RESULTCarroll LJ, Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, Haldeman S, Holm LW, Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Cote P, Nordin M, Peloso PM, Guzman J, Cassidy JD. Course and prognostic factors for neck pain in the general population: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Feb;32(2 Suppl):S87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.11.013.
PMID: 19251079RESULTHaller H, Lauche R, Cramer H, Rampp T, Saha FJ, Ostermann T, Dobos G. Craniosacral Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Sham-controlled Trial. Clin J Pain. 2016 May;32(5):441-9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000290.
PMID: 26340656RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tuğba GÖNEN, Asisst. Prof. Dr.
Hasan Kalyoncu University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2025
First Posted
November 25, 2025
Study Start
July 20, 2025
Primary Completion
August 20, 2025
Study Completion
October 20, 2025
Last Updated
November 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share