NCT07245745

Brief Summary

This prospective clinical study compares patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after adaptive or conventional radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) aims to reduce uncertainties related to daily anatomical variations, thereby improving treatment accuracy while decreasing gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity. This study, conducted at Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc (Brussels and Ottignies sites), analyzes and compares toxicities in patients treated with ART on Ethos and those treated with conventional radiotherapy on Halcyon. The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate that ART reduces gastrointestinal, urinary, and general side effects induced by radiotherapy. Additionally, the secondary objectives include assessing the duration of these effects, correlating them with dosimetric data, analyzing the management of toxicities through the Noona e-health application, as well as evaluating the use of this application by both patients and healthcare providers. The study includes men aged 18 years or older with prostate cancer undergoing curative-intent treatment, with an ECOG performance status of 0 to 1, and able to use the Noona application. Patients with a history of rectal or bladder treatment, or those who have already received pelvic radiotherapy, are excluded. Two groups are compared: patients treated with conventional radiotherapy on Halcyon (Ottignies site) and those treated with adaptive radiotherapy on Ethos (Brussels site).

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
188

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable prostate-cancer

Timeline
35mo left

Started Jan 2026

Typical duration for not_applicable prostate-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress11%
Jan 2026Mar 2029

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 22, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 24, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 13, 2026

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 31, 2029

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2029

Last Updated

March 16, 2026

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

September 22, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 12, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Demonstration that adaptive radiotherapy in prostate cancer helps reduce radiotherapy-induced side effects (digestive, urinary, and general toxicity) using PROMS questionnaires.

    In this clinical study, we aim to demonstrate that adaptive radiotherapy (ART) in prostate cancer can reduce radiotherapy-induced side effects (digestive, urinary, and general toxicity). Daily adaptation of treatment plans not only ensures better target coverage but also accounts for daily variations in the position or deformation of organs at risk (OARs). Consequently, ART could reduce the occurrence of genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) side effects, either early (during or shortly after treatment) or at later stages (up to one year after completion of treatment). Three questionnaires will be used: the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26), the EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS).

    3 years

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Evaluation of the time to recovery from treatment-related adverse effects using PROMS questionnaires.

    3 years

  • Correlation of the duration of adverse effects collected with PROMS questionnaire with the dosimetric data.

    3 years

  • Evaluation of the management of treatment-related toxicity using the e-health application using a PREM questionnaire at the end of the study.

    3 years

  • Number of participants and medical staff satisfied by the ease of use of an e-health application during radiotherapy using a questionnaire.

    3 years

Study Arms (2)

Arm H-RT

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Treatment planned and delivered on the Halcyon machine with non-adaptive conventional radiotherapy.

Radiation: Radiotherapy

Arm E-ART

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Treatment planned and delivered on the Ethos machine with adaptive radiotherapy.

Radiation: Radiotherapy

Interventions

RadiotherapyRADIATION

Prostate cancer patients will be treated radiotherapy.

Arm E-ARTArm H-RT

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with prostate cancer referred for curative-intent radiotherapy
  • Male patients ≥ 18 years old
  • ECOG performance status 0-1
  • Patients willing to use an e-health application
  • Patients capable of using an e-health application
  • Proficient in French, English, or Dutch
  • No prior history of treatment for rectal or bladder cancer
  • No prior history of pelvic radiotherapy

You may not qualify if:

  • Cognitive impairment
  • ECOG ≥ 2
  • History of treatment for rectal or bladder cancer
  • History of pelvic radiotherapy
  • No access to the Noona application on a smartphone or computer

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc

Brussels, 1200, Belgium

RECRUITING

Related Publications (8)

  • de Crevoisier R, Tucker SL, Dong L, Mohan R, Cheung R, Cox JD, Kuban DA. Increased risk of biochemical and local failure in patients with distended rectum on the planning CT for prostate cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Jul 15;62(4):965-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.11.032.

    PMID: 15989996BACKGROUND
  • Heemsbergen WD, Hoogeman MS, Witte MG, Peeters ST, Incrocci L, Lebesque JV. Increased risk of biochemical and clinical failure for prostate patients with a large rectum at radiotherapy planning: results from the Dutch trial of 68 GY versus 78 Gy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Apr 1;67(5):1418-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.11.014. Epub 2007 Jan 22.

    PMID: 17241751BACKGROUND
  • Yan D, Vicini F, Wong J, Martinez A. Adaptive radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol. 1997 Jan;42(1):123-32. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/42/1/008.

    PMID: 9015813BACKGROUND
  • Posiewnik M, Piotrowski T. A review of cone-beam CT applications for adaptive radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Phys Med. 2019 Mar;59:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.02.014. Epub 2019 Feb 22.

    PMID: 30928061BACKGROUND
  • Byrne M, Archibald-Heeren B, Hu Y, Teh A, Beserminji R, Cai E, Liu G, Yates A, Rijken J, Collett N, Aland T. Varian ethos online adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Early results of contouring accuracy, treatment plan quality, and treatment time. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 Jan;23(1):e13479. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13479. Epub 2021 Nov 29.

    PMID: 34846098BACKGROUND
  • Thornqvist S, Hysing LB, Tuomikoski L, Vestergaard A, Tanderup K, Muren LP, Heijmen BJ. Adaptive radiotherapy strategies for pelvic tumors - a systematic review of clinical implementations. Acta Oncol. 2016 Aug;55(8):943-58. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2016.1156738. Epub 2016 Apr 8.

    PMID: 27055486BACKGROUND
  • Christiansen RL, Dysager L, Hansen CR, Jensen HR, Schytte T, Nyborg CJ, Bertelsen AS, Agergaard SN, Mahmood F, Hansen S, Hansen O, Brink C, Bernchou U. Online adaptive radiotherapy potentially reduces toxicity for high-risk prostate cancer treatment. Radiother Oncol. 2022 Feb;167:165-171. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.013. Epub 2021 Dec 16.

    PMID: 34923034BACKGROUND
  • Brunelli C, Zito E, Alfieri S, Borreani C, Roli A, Caraceni A, Apolone G. Knowledge, use and attitudes of healthcare professionals towards patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at a comprehensive cancer center. BMC Cancer. 2022 Feb 10;22(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09269-x.

    PMID: 35144569BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Interventions

Radiotherapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Therapeutics

Study Officials

  • Heylen Sofie, MD

    Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2025

First Posted

November 24, 2025

Study Start

January 13, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2029

Last Updated

March 16, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-09

Locations