NCT07245498

Brief Summary

The goal of this interventional study is to compare the effects of ESWT in women and men between the age 18-65 with non radicular non specific low back pain . The main question it aims to answer is: Is intervention ESWT more effective than conventional physical therapy agents. Patients were divided into 2 groups; Group 1 ESWT+conventional physical therapy and group 2: sham ESWT+conventional physical therapy. Study follow up time before treatment, 0 week after treatment, and 1 month after treatment.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
69

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable low-back-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2024

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 1, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 24, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

November 24, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

October 1, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 17, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

low back pain,Extracorporeal shock wave therapyConventional physical therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • visual analog scale(VAS)

    The VAS is a validated tool for assessing pain intensity. It consists of a 10-cm horizontal line anchored by "no pain" (0) at the left end and "worst imaginable pain" (10) at the right end. Participants indicate their perceived pain level by marking a point on the line, which is then measured in centimeters to provide a continuous pain score from 0 to 10.

    Before treatment, Baseline and 1month after treatment

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • oswestry disability score(ODI),

    Before treatment, Baseline, 1st month after treatment

  • hospital anxiety and depression scale(HADS)

    Before treatment, Baseline, 1st month after treatment

Study Arms (2)

Ekstra corporeal shock wave therapy(ESWT)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Ekstra corporeal shock wave therapy + conventional physical therapy +exercise

Other: extracorporeal shock wave therapy

sham Ekstra corporeal shock wave therapy

SHAM COMPARATOR

sham Ekstra corporeal shock wave therapy+ conventional physical therapy +exercise

Other: extracorporeal shock wave therapy

Interventions

Shock wave probe applied perpendicularly to the quadratus lumborum, the sacroiliac joint, and the regions of the patient's lumbar area where pain is localized, following the application of coupling gel to facilitate the transmission of pressure waves generated by the device through the skin via its metallic applicator head

Ekstra corporeal shock wave therapy(ESWT)sham Ekstra corporeal shock wave therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male and female patients between the ages of 18 and 65 who have had low back pain for at least three months and have been diagnosed with chronic low back pain.
  • Patients who consent to participate in the study according to the informed consent form will be included in the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of spondylolisthesis, spondylolysis, spinal tumors, intervertebral disc infections, severe osteoporosis, or lumbar vertebral fractures and patients with a history of prior spine surgery,
  • Currently using anti-inflammatory drugs or analgesics in last four weeks,
  • Local skin infection or damage at the treatment site,
  • Inflammatory rheumatic diseases,
  • Pregnancy
  • Concomitant mental diseases.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ankara City Hospital

Ankara, Çankaya, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Interventions

Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Back PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ultrasonic TherapyDiathermyHyperthermia, InducedTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitation

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Group 1: Radial ESWT+conventional physical therapy+exercise Group 2: sham ESWT+conventional physical therapy+exercise Assesments: before treatment, after treatment and 1th month after treatment primer outcome: VAS seconder outcomes: Oswestry disability index, hospital axiety and depression scale
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2025

First Posted

November 24, 2025

Study Start

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion

June 1, 2025

Study Completion

August 1, 2025

Last Updated

November 24, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Locations