NCT07243717

Brief Summary

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an information-assisted intervention in enhancing knowledge, decision self-efficacy, and reducing decisional conflict among potential living kidney donors. Using a one-group pretest-posttest design, participants will be recruited from the urology and kidney transplant outpatient clinics of two hospitals in northern Taiwan. After providing informed consent and completing a baseline questionnaire (T0), participants will receive a four-week information-assisted intervention in addition to routine care, with follow-up assessments at 4 weeks (T1) and 8 weeks (T2). Data will be collected using structured questionnaires assessing decisional conflict, decision self-efficacy, knowledge, positive thinking, family resilience, and satisfaction with the intervention.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
45

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
15mo left

Started Mar 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress8%
Mar 2026Jul 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 17, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 24, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 27, 2026

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2027

Last Updated

April 8, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

November 17, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 6, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Potential Living Kidney Donorsknowledgedecision self-efficacydecisional conflict

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Decision Self-Efficacy Scale

    The Chinese version of the Decision Self-Efficacy Scale from the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute will be used. This 11-item scale measures individuals' confidence in making informed decisions. Each item is scored from 0-4, with total scores converted to a range of 0-100. Higher scores reflect stronger decision self-efficacy.

    Baseline (T0, prior to intervention), 4 weeks (T1) and 8 weeks (T2) after Baseline

  • Decisional Conflict Scale

    The study will employ the Chinese version of the Decisional Conflict Scale developed by the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. The 16-item scale uses a 0-4 rating system (0 = yes, 4 = no). Total scores are calculated as (sum of items ÷ number of items) × 25, yielding a range of 0-100. Higher scores indicate greater decisional conflict.

    Baseline (T0, prior to intervention), 4 weeks (T1) and 8 weeks (T2) after Baseline

  • Knowledge Test on Living Kidney Donation

    A 31-item self-developed test will assess participants' knowledge regarding living kidney donation, including anatomy, legal regulations, donor eligibility, medical coverage, surgical risks, postoperative complications, and post-surgical care. Each question has three options: True, False, and Unclear. Correct answers receive 1 point, while incorrect or unclear answers receive 0 points. Higher total scores indicate better knowledge.

    Baseline (T0, prior to intervention), 4 weeks (T1) and 8 weeks (T2) after Baseline

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Positive Thinking Scale

    Baseline (T0, prior to intervention), 4 weeks (T1) and 8 weeks (T2) after Baseline

Other Outcomes (22)

  • Family Resilience Scale

    Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

  • Evaluation of the Information-Assisted Program

    4 weeks (T1) after Baseline

  • Demographic and Clinical Characteristics-Age

    Baseline (T0, prior to intervention)

  • +19 more other outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Information-Assisted group

EXPERIMENTAL
Other: Information-Assisted Intervention

Interventions

The intervention content was formulated based on previous Delphi study results and a comprehensive literature review. To facilitate comprehension, the educational materials were presented using illustrations, mind maps, tables, and concise text in an educational manual. Participants may record questions arising during their learning process, which will be discussed and clarified during consultation sessions by members of the transplant team, including physicians, social workers, and transplant coordinators.

Information-Assisted group

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Willing to undergo evaluation for living kidney donation
  • Owns a smartphone or tablet with internet access
  • Able and willing to participate in the study and provide written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • \- Deemed unsuitable for kidney donation after evaluation by a transplant specialist

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Taoyuan District, 333, Taiwan

RECRUITING

Central Study Contacts

Ching-Hui Chien, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
RN, PhD, Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2025

First Posted

November 24, 2025

Study Start

March 27, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Last Updated

April 8, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Data supporting this study's findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The data are not publicly available due to the consideration of ethics, the researchers shall maintain the privacy of the participants, and research data should be used only for academic articles.

Locations