Using Two Different Attachments (Equator Vs Ball and Sockets) Retaining Mandibular Implant Overdenture in Order to See Bone Changes and Occlusal Force Distribution
Comparing Two Different Attachments Retaining Mandibular Implant Overdenture Regarding Bone Changes and Occlusal Force Distribution (Randomized Clinical Trial)
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Alveolar ridge resorption is an unavoidable consequence in complete denture wearers due to limited retention and stability. Implant-retained overdentures enhance retention, stability, and masticatory performance while reducing ridge resorption and improving patients' quality of life. Among attachment systems, ball-type anchors have long been favored for their simplicity and cost-effectiveness. However, the Equator attachment has emerged as a refined alternative, providing superior retention and stability for implant overdentures. Functional performance can be evaluated through electromyography, which records masticatory muscle activity, and the T-Scan system, which analyzes occlusal force distribution and timing during dynamic occlusion. Additionally, bite force measurement serves as a key indicator of prosthetic efficiency and neuromuscular function, with implant-retained overdentures showing higher values than conventional dentures. This study aimed to compare bone level changes, occlusal force distribution in patients wearing mandibular implant overdentures retained by Equator and ball-and-socket attachments.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 21, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedApril 2, 2026
April 1, 2026
1.3 years
November 17, 2025
April 1, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Marginal Bone Changes
Marginal bone height changes around the two implants were evaluated through the software by measuring the distance from the alveolar crest to the implant apex in both coronal and sagittal views. The amount of bone loss was calculated by subtracting the measured distance between each radiographic evaluation made at the time of denture insertion and the recall appointments by superimposition of images and average was taken
it will be measured at denture insertion, 6 month, and 12 month later
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Occlusal force distribution measurement
it will be recorded at the time of prosthesis insertion, 6 months, and 12 months after denture insertion.
Study Arms (2)
Ball & Socket Attachment
ACTIVE COMPARATOROn the 2nd stage, implants will be loaded with ball \& socket attachments to retain overdenture
Equator Attachment
EXPERIMENTALOn the 2nd stage, implants will be loaded with Equator attachments to retain overdenture
Interventions
Two implants will be restored using Equator attachment systems, with the mandibular denture retained over these attachments through corresponding metal housings
Two implants will be restored using ball-and-socket attachment systems, with the mandibular denture retained over these attachments through corresponding metal housings
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients age must range from 55- 60 years old.
- All patients' ridges should be covered with firm mucosa free from any signs of inflammation or ulceration and exhibit adequate height and width of the residual alveolar ridge.
- Patients should be free from any metabolic or bone disorder that contraindicate implant installation.
- All patients must have sufficient inter arch space
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with oral or systemic diseases.
- Patients with xerostomia or excessive salivation.
- Patients with parafunctional habits (bruxism or clenching).
- Heavy smoker or alcoholic patients.
- Patients with history of temporo-mandibular dysfunction.
- Patients with brain disorders or psychiatric disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Oral and Dental Research Institute, National Research Center
Cairo, 4470351, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2025
First Posted
November 21, 2025
Study Start
July 1, 2024
Primary Completion
November 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
April 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR
- Time Frame
- Start Date: After publication End Date: 3 years
- Access Criteria
- After publication through the corresponding author
Study Protocol and Clinical Study Report