NCT07239427

Brief Summary

The trial is designed to determine the added effect of active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) when combined with a multimodal Active Pain Coping Program in individuals with fibromyalgia. The primary objective is to compare the effectiveness of active versus sham tDCS when both are delivered to the same standardized multimodal intervention. All participants will undergo an identical treatment sequence consisting of 8 sessions of Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE), followed by 5 consecutive daily sessions of either active or sham tDCS, and 18 sessions of therapeutic exercise (TE). Active tDCS will be administered over the primary motor cortex (M1) and orbitofrontal region for 20 minutes at 2 mA. The sham procedure will replicate the electrode placement and brief initial stimulation to ensure blinding, with no active current thereafter. Secondary outcomes will examine changes in pain intensity, central pain processing, psychological variables, and physical function.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
68

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
1mo left

Started Dec 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress87%
Dec 2025Jun 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 15, 2025

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 20, 2025

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

November 20, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

November 15, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 15, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

FibromyalgiaTranscranial Direct Current StimulationNeuromodulationTherapeutic ExercisePain Science EducationPain Neuroscience Education

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ)

    The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) assesses the global impact and severity of FM across 10 items covering Physical Function, Work Status, and Symptoms (pain, fatigue, stiffness, etc.). The total score ranges from 0 to 100. The calculation involves summing and scaling the scores from the three components: Physical Function is scored on a 4-point scale (0-3) and the sum is then multiplied by 3; Work Status and Symptoms (rated on VAS/NRS) are scaled to contribute to the final 100-point total. The FIQ is a disability and severity index: a higher score (closer to 100) indicates a greater impact of fibromyalgia, signifying higher functional disability, more severe symptoms, and a worse quality of life. Conversely, a lower score (closer to 0) indicates a better health status. The primary objective is to observe a significant decrease in this score.

    Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline (enrollment), post-intervention (end of the 12-week treatment protocol), and at a 3-month follow-up after treatment.

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Pain Intensity (Visual analogue scale)

    Baseline, Post-Intervention (12 weeks), and Follow-up (6 months).

  • Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)

    Baseline, post-intervention (end of the 12-week treatment protocol), and at a 3-month follow-up after treatment.

  • Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPT)

    Baseline, post-intervention (end of the 12-week treatment protocol), and at a 3-month follow-up after treatment.

  • Change in Temporal Summation

    Baseline, post-intervention (end of the 12-week treatment protocol), and at a 3-month follow-up after treatment.

  • Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)

    Baseline, post-intervention (end of the 12-week treatment protocol), and at a 3-month follow-up after treatment.

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Active tDCS and Multimodal Active Pain Coping Program

EXPERIMENTAL

This group receives the Multimodal Active Pain Coping Program. The intervention sequence is: 8 sessions of Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE), followed by 5 daily sessions of Active Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), and then 18 sessions of Therapeutic Exercise (TE). The Active tDCS is applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) and orbitofrontal region for 20 minutes at 2 mA, aiming to potentiate the analgesic effects of the overall Active Pain Coping strategies.

Behavioral: Pain Science EducationDevice: Transcranial Direct Current StimulationBehavioral: Therapeutic Exercise

Sham tDCS and Multimodal Active Pain Coping Program

SHAM COMPARATOR

This group receives the identical Multimodal Active Pain Coping Program. The intervention sequence is: 8 sessions of Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE), followed by 5 daily sessions of Sham (Placebo) Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), and then 18 sessions of Therapeutic Exercise (TE). The Sham tDCS uses the same electrode placement but only runs for a few seconds to maintain participant blinding, providing no active current for the remainder of the 20-minute session.

Behavioral: Pain Science EducationBehavioral: Therapeutic ExerciseDevice: Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Interventions

Pain Science Education component is the initial phase of the multimodal Active Pain Coping program. Its objective is to reframe maladaptive beliefs about pain in Fibromyalgia patients by providing a modern neuroscientific understanding of their persistent pain condition. The content focuses on explaining that pain does not necessarily equate to tissue damage but is a protective output generated by the brain, addressing the physiology of pain and sensitization, the relationship between fear and movement avoidance (kinesiophobia), and the potential of neuroplasticity to "retrain" the nervous system. This phase is crucial for reducing pain catastrophizing and fear, thereby empowering the patient to actively and fully participate in the subsequent treatment phases.

Active tDCS and Multimodal Active Pain Coping ProgramSham tDCS and Multimodal Active Pain Coping Program

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique used in this study to enhance the central analgesic effects of the combined Active Pain Coping treatment. The intervention involves the delivery of a low-intensity electrical current through the scalp to modulate cortical excitability. The Anode is positioned over the Primary Motor Cortex (M1) (C3) and the Cathode is placed over the Orbitofrontal region (FP2). The Active Group receives a constant 2 mA current for 20 minutes to modulate brain activity.

Active tDCS and Multimodal Active Pain Coping Program

Therapeutic Exercise (TE) is the most extensive component of the multimodal program, administered in structured group sessions lasting approximately one hour. The protocol is designed to be adapted to each patient's physical condition, and includes a graded exposure component to ensure safety and mitigate pain flares. Each session includes a warm-up (mobility/activation); a main phase focused on conscious movement, coordination, balance, agility, and muscular strength; and a final cool-down that incorporates flexibility, relaxation, and mindfulness. The primary purpose of this structured exercise is to safely promote physical activity, reverse physical deconditioning and muscle atrophy, reduce fear of movement (kinesiophobia), and reinforce the new neuroscientific understanding of pain acquired, thereby sustaining the overall analgesic effects of the treatment.

Active tDCS and Multimodal Active Pain Coping ProgramSham tDCS and Multimodal Active Pain Coping Program

Control Group receives an identical-looking Sham (Placebo) stimulation, where the device runs for only the initial minute (at 2 mA) before turning off silently, ensuring the participants remain blinded to the treatment they receive.

Sham tDCS and Multimodal Active Pain Coping Program

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Must have a prior diagnosis of Fibromyalgia (FM), which must be documented and validated in the patient's medical record.

You may not qualify if:

  • Neurological Conditions: History of epilepsy or any other decompensated neurological condition that could contraindicate Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).
  • Active Pathologies: Presence of other active or recent pathologies (e.g., cancer, fractures, fissures, or severe traumatic accidents of the skull) that could interfere with treatment or evaluation.
  • Pregnancy: Currently pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study period.
  • Metallic Implants: Presence of metallic implants in the skull that may interact with or contraindicate the use of tDCS.
  • Concurrent Studies: Active participation in another concurrent clinical research study involving treatments for fibromyalgia.
  • Protocol Adherence: Inability to understand or adhere to the treatment and evaluation protocol.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Unidad de Estrategias de Afrontamiento Activo del Dolor.

Valladolid, Valladolid, 47011, Spain

RECRUITING

Related Publications (25)

  • Staud R, Weyl EE, Riley JL 3rd, Fillingim RB. Slow temporal summation of pain for assessment of central pain sensitivity and clinical pain of fibromyalgia patients. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 18;9(2):e89086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089086. eCollection 2014.

  • Staud R, Vierck CJ, Cannon RL, Mauderli AP, Price DD. Abnormal sensitization and temporal summation of second pain (wind-up) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Pain. 2001 Mar;91(1-2):165-75. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(00)00432-2.

  • Sosa-Reina MD, Nunez-Nagy S, Gallego-Izquierdo T, Pecos-Martin D, Monserrat J, Alvarez-Mon M. Effectiveness of Therapeutic Exercise in Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2356346. doi: 10.1155/2017/2356346. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

  • Serrat M, Almirall M, Muste M, Sanabria-Mazo JP, Feliu-Soler A, Mendez-Ulrich JL, Luciano JV, Sanz A. Effectiveness of a Multicomponent Treatment for Fibromyalgia Based on Pain Neuroscience Education, Exercise Therapy, Psychological Support, and Nature Exposure (NAT-FM): A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 18;9(10):3348. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103348.

  • Schmidt-Wilcke T, Luerding R, Weigand T, Jurgens T, Schuierer G, Leinisch E, Bogdahn U. Striatal grey matter increase in patients suffering from fibromyalgia--a voxel-based morphometry study. Pain. 2007 Nov;132 Suppl 1:S109-S116. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.05.010. Epub 2007 Jun 22.

  • Sarzi-Puttini P, Giorgi V, Marotto D, Atzeni F. Fibromyalgia: an update on clinical characteristics, aetiopathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020 Nov;16(11):645-660. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-00506-w. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

  • O'Brien AT, Deitos A, Trinanes Pego Y, Fregni F, Carrillo-de-la-Pena MT. Defective Endogenous Pain Modulation in Fibromyalgia: A Meta-Analysis of Temporal Summation and Conditioned Pain Modulation Paradigms. J Pain. 2018 Aug;19(8):819-836. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

  • Mhalla A, de Andrade DC, Baudic S, Perrot S, Bouhassira D. Alteration of cortical excitability in patients with fibromyalgia. Pain. 2010 Jun;149(3):495-500. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.03.009. Epub 2010 Mar 31.

  • Mhalla A, Baudic S, de Andrade DC, Gautron M, Perrot S, Teixeira MJ, Attal N, Bouhassira D. Long-term maintenance of the analgesic effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation in fibromyalgia. Pain. 2011 Jul;152(7):1478-1485. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.01.034. Epub 2011 Mar 11.

  • Mendonca ME, Simis M, Grecco LC, Battistella LR, Baptista AF, Fregni F. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Aerobic Exercise to Optimize Analgesic Responses in Fibromyalgia: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Mar 10;10:68. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00068. eCollection 2016.

  • Macfarlane GJ, Kronisch C, Dean LE, Atzeni F, Hauser W, Fluss E, Choy E, Kosek E, Amris K, Branco J, Dincer F, Leino-Arjas P, Longley K, McCarthy GM, Makri S, Perrot S, Sarzi-Puttini P, Taylor A, Jones GT. EULAR revised recommendations for the management of fibromyalgia. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Feb;76(2):318-328. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209724. Epub 2016 Jul 4.

  • Lutz J, Jager L, de Quervain D, Krauseneck T, Padberg F, Wichnalek M, Beyer A, Stahl R, Zirngibl B, Morhard D, Reiser M, Schelling G. White and gray matter abnormalities in the brain of patients with fibromyalgia: a diffusion-tensor and volumetric imaging study. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Dec;58(12):3960-9. doi: 10.1002/art.24070.

  • Lloyd DM, Wittkopf PG, Arendsen LJ, Jones AKP. Is Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Effective for the Treatment of Pain in Fibromyalgia? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pain. 2020 Nov-Dec;21(11-12):1085-1100. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2020.01.003. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

  • Lefaucheur JP, Antal A, Ayache SS, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Cogiamanian F, Cotelli M, De Ridder D, Ferrucci R, Langguth B, Marangolo P, Mylius V, Nitsche MA, Padberg F, Palm U, Poulet E, Priori A, Rossi S, Schecklmann M, Vanneste S, Ziemann U, Garcia-Larrea L, Paulus W. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jan;128(1):56-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.087. Epub 2016 Oct 29.

  • Knijnik LM, Dussan-Sarria JA, Rozisky JR, Torres IL, Brunoni AR, Fregni F, Caumo W. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Fibromyalgia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Pract. 2016 Mar;16(3):294-304. doi: 10.1111/papr.12276. Epub 2015 Jan 12.

  • Jensen KB, Loitoile R, Kosek E, Petzke F, Carville S, Fransson P, Marcus H, Williams SC, Choy E, Mainguy Y, Vitton O, Gracely RH, Gollub R, Ingvar M, Kong J. Patients with fibromyalgia display less functional connectivity in the brain's pain inhibitory network. Mol Pain. 2012 Apr 26;8:32. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-8-32.

  • Hauser W, Ablin J, Perrot S, Fitzcharles MA. Management of fibromyalgia: practical guides from recent evidence-based guidelines. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2017 Jan 4;127(1):47-56. doi: 10.20452/pamw.3877. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

  • Garcia-Rios MC, Navarro-Ledesma S, Tapia-Haro RM, Toledano-Moreno S, Casas-Barragan A, Correa-Rodriguez M, Aguilar-Ferrandiz ME. Effectiveness of health education in patients with fibromyalgia: a systematic review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Apr;55(2):301-313. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05524-2. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

  • Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;117(4):845-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003. Epub 2006 Jan 19.

  • Galan-Martin MA, Montero-Cuadrado F, Lluch-Girbes E, Coca-Lopez MC, Mayo-Iscar A, Cuesta-Vargas A. Pain Neuroscience Education and Physical Therapeutic Exercise for Patients with Chronic Spinal Pain in Spanish Physiotherapy Primary Care: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 22;9(4):1201. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041201.

  • Fertonani A, Miniussi C. Transcranial Electrical Stimulation: What We Know and Do Not Know About Mechanisms. Neuroscientist. 2017 Apr;23(2):109-123. doi: 10.1177/1073858416631966. Epub 2016 Jul 8.

  • Duarte D, Castelo-Branco LEC, Uygur Kucukseymen E, Fregni F. Developing an optimized strategy with transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance the endogenous pain control system in fibromyalgia. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018 Dec;15(12):863-873. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1551129. Epub 2018 Dec 3.

  • Desmeules JA, Cedraschi C, Rapiti E, Baumgartner E, Finckh A, Cohen P, Dayer P, Vischer TL. Neurophysiologic evidence for a central sensitization in patients with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 May;48(5):1420-9. doi: 10.1002/art.10893.

  • Castelo-Branco L, Uygur Kucukseymen E, Duarte D, El-Hagrassy MM, Bonin Pinto C, Gunduz ME, Cardenas-Rojas A, Pacheco-Barrios K, Yang Y, Gonzalez-Mego P, Estudillo-Guerra A, Candido-Santos L, Mesia-Toledo I, Rafferty H, Caumo W, Fregni F. Optimised transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for fibromyalgia-targeting the endogenous pain control system: a randomised, double-blind, factorial clinical trial protocol. BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 30;9(10):e032710. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032710.

  • Cabo-Meseguer A, Cerda-Olmedo G, Trillo-Mata JL. Fibromyalgia: Prevalence, epidemiologic profiles and economic costs. Med Clin (Barc). 2017 Nov 22;149(10):441-448. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jul 19. English, Spanish.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia

Interventions

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationExercise Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsConvulsive TherapyPsychiatric Somatic TherapiesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesElectroshockPsychological TechniquesRehabilitationAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CarePhysical Therapy Modalities

Central Study Contacts

Federico Montero Cuadrado, Physiotherapy

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Participants are masked (blinded): Participants are unaware of their group assignment, as the control group receives a sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) protocol that is designed to be indistinguishable from the active stimulation. Investigators are masked (blinded): The study personnel responsible for collecting the primary outcome data and performing the statistical analysis will also be masked (blinded) to the participants' group assignment.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MSc

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2025

First Posted

November 20, 2025

Study Start

December 1, 2025

Primary Completion

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Last Updated

November 20, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations