Randomized, Sham-Controlled Investigation of the Leia Sensory Prosthesis in Individuals With Peripheral Neuropathy
MYN-L001-001
Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Multicenter Investigation of the Leia Sensory Prosthesis on Gait and Balance in Peripheral Neuropathy.
2 other identifiers
interventional
80
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This study will evaluate a wearable device intended to support balance and gait in adults with peripheral neuropathy. Participants will use the device for a defined period, and outcomes related to safety, usability, and functional performance will be assessed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 13, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 19, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 3, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2028
July 15, 2026
July 1, 2026
7 months
November 13, 2025
July 13, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) total score
The FGA is a validated clinical scale that assesses gait function and balance under various walking tasks.
Change in Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) total score from baseline (day 0) to day 56.
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) total score
From baseline (day 0) to the end of the supervised period (day 28), change from day 28 to day 56, and evaluation of evolution across all timepoints, with and without stimulation
Timed-up and Go (TUG) in seconds
Change from Baseline to day 56
Neuropathic pain symptoms (NPSI questionnaire)
Change from baseline to each of the follow-up time points (day 7, 14, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56 and 80)
Quality of life (NORFOLK QOL-DN, EQ-5D-5L questionnaire)
Change from baseline to day 28, day 56 and day 80
Sensory function - Monofilament test
Change from baseline value from day 7 pre-stimulation to follow-up time points (day 28 and 56)
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
Exploratory - Sensory function - Temperature measurement using the thermal imaging camera
Change from baseline value from day 7 prestimulation to follow-up time points day 28 and 56
Safety Outcome
through study completion, an average of 4 months
Safety Outcome
through study completion, an average of 4 months
Study Arms (2)
Active Device
EXPERIMENTALParticipants use the active wearable device during the study period.
Sham Device
SHAM COMPARATORParticipants use a sham version of the wearable device without active functionality.
Interventions
A non-invasive wearable device used to assess balance, gait, and usability in individuals with peripheral neuropathy.
A sham version of the wearable device without active functionality.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed informed consent prior to any study procedure
- Adults ≥ 18 years
- Clinical diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy, confirmed per site procedures and neurophysiological testing (e.g. NCV)
- Gait or balance difficulties as self-reported and confirmed by Functional Gait Assessment (FGA score ≤ 23) and/or single-leg stance \< 30 seconds
- Able to walk without walking aids
- Stable supplements and medications ≥ 1 month before baseline and willing to maintain stability during the investigation (same dosage and same medication within the last month)
- Willingness and ability to attend weekly sessions, perform home use, and return for follow-up
You may not qualify if:
- Untreated/unhealed lesion of any kind (e.g., wounds, swelling, infection, inflamed area of skin or eruptions on the lower leg (foot and ankle) or near product use (e.g., untreated lymphedema, phlebitis, thrombo-phlebitis or varicose veins)
- Untreated/unhealed fractures in the foot and ankle
- Cancerous growth in the planned treatment area
- Severe peripheral vascular disease (e.g., gangrene)
- Cognitive impairment that precludes informed consent or device use
- Implanted electrical devices or pacemakers
- Lower-limb orthoses/braces that cannot be removed for assessments
- Pregnant or breast-feeding females
- Usage of other medical devices for the relief of neuropathic symptoms during the study
- Current participation in any other clinical study using an investigational device or investigational drug
- Orthopedic conditions substantially limiting gait (e.g., failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), recent hip or knee replacement, unstable fractures) as judged by the investigator
- For patients who have been randomized in the active treatment group only: Incapability to perceive somatotopic sensations (tested at screening by MYNERVA staff)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- MYNERVA AGlead
Study Sites (3)
Hôpital de la Tour
Meyrin, 1217, Switzerland
Ensemble Hospitalier de la Côte (EHC)
Morges, 1110, Switzerland
Universitätsklinik Balgrist
Zurich, 8008, Switzerland
Related Publications (1)
Gozzi N, Chee L, Odermatt I, Kikkert S, Preatoni G, Valle G, Pfender N, Beuschlein F, Wenderoth N, Zipser C, Raspopovic S. Wearable non-invasive neuroprosthesis for targeted sensory restoration in neuropathy. Nat Commun. 2024 Dec 30;15(1):10840. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55152-7.
PMID: 39738088BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants and outcomes assessors are masked to group allocation (active vs. sham). A subset of care providers responsible for device setup and allocation is unblinded due to practical requirements, while other care providers interacting with participants remain blinded whenever feasible. Investigators at the site have access to allocation information if needed for safety or clinical decision-making.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 13, 2025
First Posted
November 19, 2025
Study Start
June 3, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2028
Last Updated
July 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-07