e-Motion : Promoting Emotion Regulation in Chronic Cancer
Promoting Emotion Regulation in Patients Living With Chronic Cancer : A Pilot Feasibility, Acceptability and Tolerability Study (e-Motion Project)
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The present study aimed to pilot evaluate two interventions: a Guided Self-Help Intervention alone, and a combined Group and Guided Self-Help Intervention, designed to support individuals living with chronic cancer and recently diagnosed. The primary aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility, acceptability and tolerability of the interventions. The secondary aim of the pilot study is to assess the interventions preliminary efficacy and differences on psychological symptoms.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2025
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 5, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 19, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 20, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
November 21, 2025
November 1, 2025
1.1 years
September 5, 2025
November 20, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Recruitment rate
At least 25% of eligible patients agree to participate.
Baseline (T0)
Retention rate
At least 80% of patients complete the study to the end. The study completion rate is calculated based on the difference between the number of patients enrolled in T0 and those who completed the study in T2.
Baseline (T0), Weekly 15 (T2)
Adherence to intervention
At least 70% of patients complete all sessions regardless of the intervention arm. The weekly call includes a question asking participants whether they attended the week's session. Answer with Yes or No. If yes: go through all of the following questions. If no: investigate further to see if anything has been done."
Weeks 1 to 12 (intervention with weekly call)
Adherence to between-session practice
At least 70% of patients complete all assigned between-session exercises. The weekly call includes a question asking participants if they have done their exercises throughout the week. Answer with yes or no. The exercise completion rate between sessions is defined as the proportion of patients who reported having completed all weekly exercises among those who responded to the follow-up question.
Weeks 1 to 12 (intervention with weekly call)
Data completeness self-report questionnaire
At least 90% of patients complete all data of questionnaires at both time points (T1 and T2).
Baseline (T1) and Weekly 15 (T2)
Data completeness EMA
At least 70% of data are collected for the ecological momentary assessments.
Baseline (T1), Weeks 1 to 12 (Ecological weekly assessment), Weekly 15 (T2)
Satisfaction of the intervention
At least 80% of patients rate the intervention as satisfactory. This percentage is calculated based on the response to one of the questions in the satisfaction questionnaire, which is 1-item, 6-point self-report questionnaire (0 = Not at all, 6 = Absolutely). The question investigates whether, overall, participants were satisfied with the intervention. Mean score is ≥ 4 in the satisfaction questionnaire. Satisfaction will also be assessed through a qualitative analysis (thematic analysis) of the transcript of the exit interview. The questionnaires were developed for this study.
Week 15 (T2)
Willingness to recommend
At least 80% of patients would recommend the intervention to other patients. This percentage is calculated based on the response to one of the questions in the satisfaction questionnaire, which is 1-item, 6-point self-report questionnaire (0 = Not at all, 6 = Absolutely). The question investigates the extent to which participants would recommend this intervention to other patients in their situation. Mean score is ≥ 4 in the satisfaction questionnaire. The questionnaire was developed for this study.
Week 15 (T2)
Dropout rate due to intervention-related burden
No more than 10% of patients discontinue participation due to emotional distress or perceived burden linked to the intervention, as assessed by one question of the drop-out questionnaire which is: 'The reasons for this decision are related to: A. The intervention B. The questionnaires C. Both.' The percentage is calculated based on the number of patients who answered A or C.
Baseline (T1), Weeks 1 to 12 (Intervention), Weekly 15 (T2)
Self-reported emotional impact
At least 80% of patients indicate that the intervention was emotionally manageable and not overly distressing. This percentage is calculated based on the response to one of the questions in the satisfaction questionnaire, which is 1-item, 6-point self-report questionnaire (0 = Not at all, 6 = Absolutely). The question investigates the extent to which participants found this intervention emotionally comfortable or bearable. Mean score is ≥ 4 in the satisfaction questionnaire. Self-reported emotion impact will also be based on responses from the exit interviews (which is a semi-structured interview), assessed through a qualitative analysis (thematic analysis). The questionnaires were developed for this study.
Week 15 (T2)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
The Generalized Anxiety Disorders 7 items (GAD-7)
Baseline (T1), Week 15 (T2)
The Patient Health Questionnaire 9 items (PHQ-9)
Baseline (T1), Week 15 (T2)
The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ)
Baseline (T1), Week 15 (T2)
Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory (FCRI)
Baseline (T1), Week 15 (T2)
Self-efficacy
Baseline (T1), Week 15 (T2)
Study Arms (2)
Guided Self-Help intervention arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORGuided self-help emotion regulation intervention for patient with chronic and incurable cancer.
Group and Guided Self-Help intervention arm
EXPERIMENTALGroup and guided self-help emotion regulation intervention for patient with chronic and incurable cancer.
Interventions
This intervention will consist of 8 self-administered modules that patients will complete every week. The sessions integrate an emotion regulation component with breathing exercises, relaxation exercises, hypnosis, etc. Once a week (maximum 15-minute), a trained psychologist will call the patient to help and/or encourage them. Each module will consist of podcasts, a reading assignment (with psycho-educational information) and writing assignments. The intervention will include home exercises and patients will be encouraged to practice exercises and skills learned between the sessions.
It will consist of the same content described above, but given in 8 group sessions (2-hour) held by videoconference (Zoom) that will take place every week. Patients will also have access to the podcasts, home exercises and reading assignment, but will benefit from increased motivation and support from both the therapist and their peers in the group. Each group will be composed of 5 patients.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Having received a diagnosis of chronic cancer (metastatic breast cancer, metastatic melanoma, metastatic colorectal, metastatic ovarian, metastatic uterine, metastatic endometrial, metastatic prostate, metastatic bladder, metastatic kidney or metastatic testicular cancer, symptomatic multiple myeloma, metastatic non-small cell lung, metastatic mesothelioma or metastatic thymoma) in the past 12 months,
- Having completed at least one active treatment session (e.g., chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, target therapy).
You may not qualify if:
- Having less than one year of life expectancy
- Having more than one treatment line (for triple negative breast cancer, melanoma, gynecological cancer, colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, kidney cancer, non-small cell lung, mesothelioma and thymoma) or two treatment lines (for other breast cancers and testicular cancer) or three treatment lines (for prostate cancer and multiple myeloma),
- Having a diagnosis of oligometastatic cancer,
- Age \< 18 years,
- Non-fluency in French,
- Inability to follow the online intervention,
- Severe cognitive impairment, and severe and/or acute psychiatric disorder.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Université Libre de Bruxelleslead
- Centre de Psycho-Oncologie (CPO)collaborator
- Jules Bordet Institutecollaborator
- Erasme University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital universitaire de Bruxelles
Brussels, Anderlecht, 1070, Belgium
H.U.B Institut Jules Bordet
Brussels, Brussels Capital, 1070, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Florence Lewis, PhD
Université Libre de Bruxelles
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Isabelle Merckaert, Professor
Université Libre de Bruxelles
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 5, 2025
First Posted
November 19, 2025
Study Start
November 20, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
November 21, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share