NCT07236021

Brief Summary

The present study aimed to pilot evaluate two interventions: a Guided Self-Help Intervention alone, and a combined Group and Guided Self-Help Intervention, designed to support individuals living with chronic cancer and recently diagnosed. The primary aim of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility, acceptability and tolerability of the interventions. The secondary aim of the pilot study is to assess the interventions preliminary efficacy and differences on psychological symptoms.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
9mo left

Started Nov 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress37%
Nov 2025Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 5, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 19, 2025

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 20, 2025

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

November 21, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

September 5, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 20, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Advanced cancerCognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)Emotional regulationEcological Momentary Assessment (EMA)HypnosisPsychotherapy Group

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

  • Recruitment rate

    At least 25% of eligible patients agree to participate.

    Baseline (T0)

  • Retention rate

    At least 80% of patients complete the study to the end. The study completion rate is calculated based on the difference between the number of patients enrolled in T0 and those who completed the study in T2.

    Baseline (T0), Weekly 15 (T2)

  • Adherence to intervention

    At least 70% of patients complete all sessions regardless of the intervention arm. The weekly call includes a question asking participants whether they attended the week's session. Answer with Yes or No. If yes: go through all of the following questions. If no: investigate further to see if anything has been done."

    Weeks 1 to 12 (intervention with weekly call)

  • Adherence to between-session practice

    At least 70% of patients complete all assigned between-session exercises. The weekly call includes a question asking participants if they have done their exercises throughout the week. Answer with yes or no. The exercise completion rate between sessions is defined as the proportion of patients who reported having completed all weekly exercises among those who responded to the follow-up question.

    Weeks 1 to 12 (intervention with weekly call)

  • Data completeness self-report questionnaire

    At least 90% of patients complete all data of questionnaires at both time points (T1 and T2).

    Baseline (T1) and Weekly 15 (T2)

  • Data completeness EMA

    At least 70% of data are collected for the ecological momentary assessments.

    Baseline (T1), Weeks 1 to 12 (Ecological weekly assessment), Weekly 15 (T2)

  • Satisfaction of the intervention

    At least 80% of patients rate the intervention as satisfactory. This percentage is calculated based on the response to one of the questions in the satisfaction questionnaire, which is 1-item, 6-point self-report questionnaire (0 = Not at all, 6 = Absolutely). The question investigates whether, overall, participants were satisfied with the intervention. Mean score is ≥ 4 in the satisfaction questionnaire. Satisfaction will also be assessed through a qualitative analysis (thematic analysis) of the transcript of the exit interview. The questionnaires were developed for this study.

    Week 15 (T2)

  • Willingness to recommend

    At least 80% of patients would recommend the intervention to other patients. This percentage is calculated based on the response to one of the questions in the satisfaction questionnaire, which is 1-item, 6-point self-report questionnaire (0 = Not at all, 6 = Absolutely). The question investigates the extent to which participants would recommend this intervention to other patients in their situation. Mean score is ≥ 4 in the satisfaction questionnaire. The questionnaire was developed for this study.

    Week 15 (T2)

  • Dropout rate due to intervention-related burden

    No more than 10% of patients discontinue participation due to emotional distress or perceived burden linked to the intervention, as assessed by one question of the drop-out questionnaire which is: 'The reasons for this decision are related to: A. The intervention B. The questionnaires C. Both.' The percentage is calculated based on the number of patients who answered A or C.

    Baseline (T1), Weeks 1 to 12 (Intervention), Weekly 15 (T2)

  • Self-reported emotional impact

    At least 80% of patients indicate that the intervention was emotionally manageable and not overly distressing. This percentage is calculated based on the response to one of the questions in the satisfaction questionnaire, which is 1-item, 6-point self-report questionnaire (0 = Not at all, 6 = Absolutely). The question investigates the extent to which participants found this intervention emotionally comfortable or bearable. Mean score is ≥ 4 in the satisfaction questionnaire. Self-reported emotion impact will also be based on responses from the exit interviews (which is a semi-structured interview), assessed through a qualitative analysis (thematic analysis). The questionnaires were developed for this study.

    Week 15 (T2)

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • The Generalized Anxiety Disorders 7 items (GAD-7)

    Baseline (T1), Week 15 (T2)

  • The Patient Health Questionnaire 9 items (PHQ-9)

    Baseline (T1), Week 15 (T2)

  • The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ)

    Baseline (T1), Week 15 (T2)

  • Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory (FCRI)

    Baseline (T1), Week 15 (T2)

  • Self-efficacy

    Baseline (T1), Week 15 (T2)

Study Arms (2)

Guided Self-Help intervention arm

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Guided self-help emotion regulation intervention for patient with chronic and incurable cancer.

Behavioral: Guided Self-Help intervention

Group and Guided Self-Help intervention arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Group and guided self-help emotion regulation intervention for patient with chronic and incurable cancer.

Behavioral: Group and Guided Self-Help intervention

Interventions

This intervention will consist of 8 self-administered modules that patients will complete every week. The sessions integrate an emotion regulation component with breathing exercises, relaxation exercises, hypnosis, etc. Once a week (maximum 15-minute), a trained psychologist will call the patient to help and/or encourage them. Each module will consist of podcasts, a reading assignment (with psycho-educational information) and writing assignments. The intervention will include home exercises and patients will be encouraged to practice exercises and skills learned between the sessions.

Guided Self-Help intervention arm

It will consist of the same content described above, but given in 8 group sessions (2-hour) held by videoconference (Zoom) that will take place every week. Patients will also have access to the podcasts, home exercises and reading assignment, but will benefit from increased motivation and support from both the therapist and their peers in the group. Each group will be composed of 5 patients.

Group and Guided Self-Help intervention arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Having received a diagnosis of chronic cancer (metastatic breast cancer, metastatic melanoma, metastatic colorectal, metastatic ovarian, metastatic uterine, metastatic endometrial, metastatic prostate, metastatic bladder, metastatic kidney or metastatic testicular cancer, symptomatic multiple myeloma, metastatic non-small cell lung, metastatic mesothelioma or metastatic thymoma) in the past 12 months,
  • Having completed at least one active treatment session (e.g., chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, target therapy).

You may not qualify if:

  • Having less than one year of life expectancy
  • Having more than one treatment line (for triple negative breast cancer, melanoma, gynecological cancer, colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, kidney cancer, non-small cell lung, mesothelioma and thymoma) or two treatment lines (for other breast cancers and testicular cancer) or three treatment lines (for prostate cancer and multiple myeloma),
  • Having a diagnosis of oligometastatic cancer,
  • Age \< 18 years,
  • Non-fluency in French,
  • Inability to follow the online intervention,
  • Severe cognitive impairment, and severe and/or acute psychiatric disorder.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital universitaire de Bruxelles

Brussels, Anderlecht, 1070, Belgium

NOT YET RECRUITING

H.U.B Institut Jules Bordet

Brussels, Brussels Capital, 1070, Belgium

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

NeoplasmsMultiple MyelomaEmotional Regulation

Interventions

Population Groups

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms, Plasma CellNeoplasms by Histologic TypeHemostatic DisordersVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesParaproteinemiasBlood Protein DisordersHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesHemorrhagic DisordersLymphoproliferative DisordersImmunoproliferative DisordersImmune System DiseasesSelf-ControlSocial BehaviorBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DemographyPopulation Characteristics

Study Officials

  • Florence Lewis, PhD

    Université Libre de Bruxelles

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Isabelle Merckaert, Professor

    Université Libre de Bruxelles

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Isabelle Merckaert, Professor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A pilot feasibility, acceptability and tolerability project. Two steps: The first included 15 patients will be assigned to a Guided Self-Help intervention. The second starts only after the first has ended. For this one, 15 other patients are recruited and assigned to a Group and Guided Self-Help intervention.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2025

First Posted

November 19, 2025

Study Start

November 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

November 21, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations