The Effect of Apical Patency on Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
72
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate whether implementing apical patency affects the intensity of postoperative pain after single-visit root canal treatment in asymptomatic, vital, single-rooted teeth. The main question it aims to answer is: Does maintaining apical patency by gently extending a #10 K-file 1 mm beyond the working length during canal shaping influence postoperative pain compared with instrumentation confined within the working length? In the patency group, the working length was determined with an electronic apex locator and radiograph, and then apical patency was maintained by passively extending a #10 K-file 1 mm beyond the working length at each instrument change to prevent apical blockage, remove debris, and facilitate irrigant delivery to the apical terminus. In the non-patency group, the working length was likewise established with an electronic apex locator and radiograph, but all subsequent instrumentation was confined within the working length and no file was advanced beyond the apical foramen. In both groups, all other clinical procedures-including anesthesia, rubber dam isolation, access cavity preparation, rotary canal shaping with the One Curve NiTi system, standardized irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl and 17% EDTA, obturation with gutta-percha and epoxy resin-based sealer, and definitive composite restoration-were performed in a single visit using the same protocol. Postoperative pain was recorded on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 0-6, 6-12, 12-24, 24-36, and 36-48 hours, and analgesic intake within 48 hours was documented.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 5, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 14, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2025
CompletedNovember 18, 2025
November 1, 2025
2 months
November 14, 2025
November 14, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
The numerical rating scale for pain is an 11-point scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst pain imaginable. The patient is asked to choose the number that best represents the intensity of pain he or she feels at that moment. It is used to assess the severity of postoperative pain and to help evaluate the need for and response to analgesic medication. Also called NRS.
Up to 48 hours after treatment.
Study Arms (2)
Non-Patency Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPreoperative pain was recorded using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) before treatment. All procedures were performed in a single visit by one operator under 3× magnification. Local anesthesia was achieved with 4% articaine containing 1:100,000 epinephrine. After rubber dam isolation, caries and existing restorations were removed and an endodontic access cavity was prepared under copious water cooling using high-speed sterile diamond burs. The working length was established with an electronic apex locator (Root ZX Mini) and confirmed radiographically. In this group, apical patency was not maintained: after working length determination, all subsequent instrumentation was confined within the working length, and no file was advanced beyond the apical foramen. Root canals were shaped using the One Curve NiTi rotary system (25/.06 or 35/.04) with a crown-down technique. During shaping, canals were irrigated with a total of 10 mL of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (2 mL after each shaping step) de
Patency Group
EXPERIMENTALPreoperative pain was recorded using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) before treatment. All procedures were performed in a single visit by one operator under 3× magnification. Local anesthesia was achieved with 4% articaine containing 1:100,000 epinephrine. After rubber dam isolation, caries and existing restorations were removed and an endodontic access cavity was prepared under copious water cooling using high-speed sterile diamond burs. The working length was established with an electronic apex locator (Root ZX Mini) and confirmed radiographically. In this group, apical patency was maintained: a #10 K-file was gently advanced 1 mm beyond the working length at each instrument change to prevent apical blockage, remove accumulated debris, and facilitate irrigant delivery to the apical terminus. Root canals were shaped using the One Curve NiTi rotary system (25/.06 or 35/.04) with a crown-down technique. During shaping, canals were irrigated with a total of 10 mL of 2.5% sodium hypochl
Interventions
Single-visit root canal treatment of asymptomatic vital single-rooted teeth in which apical patency is maintained. After working length determination with an electronic apex locator and radiographic confirmation, a #10 K-file is gently extended 1 mm beyond the working length at each instrument change to prevent apical blockage, remove debris, and facilitate irrigant delivery to the apical terminus. All other steps, including anesthesia, rubber dam isolation, access cavity preparation, rotary shaping with the One Curve NiTi system, standardized irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl and 17% EDTA, obturation, and definitive composite restoration, follow a standardized protocol.
Single-visit root canal treatment of asymptomatic vital single-rooted teeth in which apical patency is not maintained. After working length determination with an electronic apex locator and radiographic confirmation, all subsequent instrumentation is confined within the working length and no file is advanced beyond the apical foramen. All other steps, including anesthesia, rubber dam isolation, access cavity preparation, rotary shaping with the One Curve NiTi system, standardized irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl and 17% EDTA, obturation, and definitive composite restoration, follow the same standardized protocol as in the patency group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals aged 18-65 years, classified as ASA I or ASA II according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), who had not taken analgesics for at least 6 hours prior to treatment.
- Asymptomatic, single-rooted vital teeth without spontaneous pain (including teeth perforated during prosthetic preparation or teeth adjacent to a cyst in an area scheduled for cyst surgery).
- Radiographic evidence of mature apices with no periapical pathology; periodontal probing depth ≤ 3 mm; and gingival health meeting Glickman's criteria.
- Individuals who are literate, able to provide written informed consent, and capable of understanding and using the pain scale.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are pregnant or have a cardiac pacemaker.
- Patients who used antibiotics within the past month or who required antibiotic prophylaxis.
- Presence of extensive restorations in the tooth of interest.
- Patients reporting concurrent pain in adjacent teeth.
- Dental or orofacial pain of non-endodontic origin.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cukurova University
Adana, Sarıçam, 01250, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Yaylali IE, Demirci GK, Kurnaz S, Celik G, Kaya BU, Tunca YM. Does Maintaining Apical Patency during Instrumentation Increase Postoperative Pain or Flare-up Rate after Nonsurgical Root Canal Treatment? A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Endod. 2018 Aug;44(8):1228-1236. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
PMID: 29935875BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adile Şehnaz Yılmaz, DDS, Phd, Professor
Cukurova University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Pricipal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2025
First Posted
November 18, 2025
Study Start
October 5, 2024
Primary Completion
December 14, 2024
Study Completion
February 10, 2025
Last Updated
November 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share