NCT07231172

Brief Summary

This study aims to determine the frequency of post-stroke fatigue (PSF) in patients experiencing their first-ever stroke and admitted to our clinic. PSF is a common and debilitating condition that significantly impacts patients' recovery and quality of life. The study will also explore the association between fatigue severity and various demographic and clinical factors such as age, gender, stroke type and duration, pain, mood disorders, sleep quality, motor and cognitive functions, spasticity, physical capacity, ambulation, independence in daily living activities, and health-related quality of life. Patients over 18 years old, at least three months post-stroke, and meeting specific inclusion criteria will be recruited. Fatigue will be assessed using validated scales including the Fatigue Severity Scale and Visual Analog Scale-Fatigue. Additional assessments will measure pain, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbances, motor and cognitive status, spasticity, physical endurance, functional mobility, and daily activity independence. The findings are expected to contribute to a better understanding of PSF and help inform more effective rehabilitation strategies.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
107

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 21, 2024

Completed
12 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 14, 2025

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 17, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 29, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 29, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

November 17, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

November 14, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 14, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Fatigue, Stroke,Frequency

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Fatigue Severity Scale

    The Fatigue Severity Scale was first used in 1989 by Krupp et al. to assess fatigue in patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. In stroke, a validity and reliability study was conducted for the first time by Nadarajah et al. in 2017. In our country, a validity and reliability study was conducted in stroke patients by Ă–zyemiÅŸĂ§i-TaÅŸkıran et al. in 2019. The FSS is a self-report questionnaire that measures the impact and severity of fatigue in daily life. The FSS consists of 9 items about fatigue scored on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The total score is the arithmetic mean of the 9 item scores. The lowest score is 9 points and the highest is 63 points. A total score of 36 points or an average score of 4 or more means that the fatigue is pathological fatigue. The higher the FSS score, the greater the impact of fatigue on daily life. Patients are assessed by asking questions according to their fatigue in the last week.

    Baseline

  • Visual Analog Scale-Fatigue

    Visual Analog Scale-Fatigue (VAS-Fatigue): The Visual Analog Scale is a 10 cm horizontal line with a legend at each end and is commonly used to measure pain levels. The VAS has been modified and renamed VAS-F to measure pathologic fatigue in cancer. One end of the line (0) indicates no fatigue and the other end (10) indicates unbearable fatigue. The patient will be asked to mark the level of fatigue felt during the last 1 week on a 10 cm line. The possible score will be between 0 and 10, with a higher score indicating a high degree of fatigue.

    Baseline

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Visual Analog Scale-Pain

    Baseline

  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    Baseline

  • Athens Insomnia Scale

    Baseline

  • Brunnstrom Motor Recovery Staging

    Baseline

  • Mini Mental State Examination

    Baseline

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Stroke patients admitted to Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic

You may qualify if:

  • Being diagnosed with stroke according to definition by the World Health Organization
  • Being over 18 years of age
  • Having had a stroke confirmed by Computed Tomography (CT) and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
  • At least 3 months after stroke
  • At least stage 2 according to the Functional Ambulation Classification
  • Agreed to participate in the study and signed the informed consent form

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous history of stroke
  • Communication problems due to reasons such as aphasia and dementia
  • Patients who are illiterate
  • Cognitive functional impairment who cannot take commands (MMSE\<24)
  • Dİagnoses such as cancer, heart failure, liver failure, renal failure that may cause fatigue
  • Signs of systemic infection
  • History of subarachnoid hemorrhage

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ankara University

Ankara, 06530, Turkey (TĂ¼rkiye)

RECRUITING

Related Publications (48)

  • Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S, Perera S; Glycine Antagonist in Neuroprotection Americans Investigators. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Jul;84(7):950-63. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00035-2.

  • Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999 Oct;30(10):2131-40. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.10.2131.

  • Kucukdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Tennant A, Suldur N, Sonel B, Arasil T. Adaptation of the modified Barthel Index for use in physical medicine and rehabilitation in Turkey. Scand J Rehabil Med. 2000 Jun;32(2):87-92.

  • Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(8):703-9. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90065-6.

  • Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Rutte K, Meissner D, Pohl M. Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Oct;88(10):1314-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.764.

  • Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther. 1984 Jan;64(1):35-40. doi: 10.1093/ptj/64.1.35.

  • Macchiavelli A, Giffone A, Ferrarello F, Paci M. Reliability of the six-minute walk test in individuals with stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2021 Jan;42(1):81-87. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04829-0. Epub 2020 Oct 16.

  • Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987 Feb;67(2):206-7. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.2.206.

  • Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.

  • Bour A, Rasquin S, Boreas A, Limburg M, Verhey F. How predictive is the MMSE for cognitive performance after stroke? J Neurol. 2010 Apr;257(4):630-7. doi: 10.1007/s00415-009-5387-9. Epub 2009 Nov 22.

  • Elhan AH, Kutlay S, Kucukdeveci AA, Cotuk C, Ozturk G, Tesio L, Tennant A. Psychometric properties of the Mini-Mental State Examination in patients with acquired brain injury in Turkey. J Rehabil Med. 2005 Sep;37(5):306-11. doi: 10.1080/16501970510037573.

  • Gungen C, Ertan T, Eker E, Yasar R, Engin F. [Reliability and validity of the standardized Mini Mental State Examination in the diagnosis of mild dementia in Turkish population]. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2002 Winter;13(4):273-81. Turkish.

  • Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.

  • Brunnstrom S. Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia: based on sequential recovery stages. Phys Ther. 1966 Apr;46(4):357-75. doi: 10.1093/ptj/46.4.357. No abstract available.

  • Elbi H, Batum M, Ozturk EO, Balcan MV, Ak AK, Yilmaz H, Aydemir O. Adaptation into Turkish and Psychometric Properties of Athens Insomnia Scale. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2024 Apr 1;61(2):154-159. doi: 10.29399/npa.28575. eCollection 2024.

  • Soldatos CR, Dikeos DG, Paparrigopoulos TJ. Athens Insomnia Scale: validation of an instrument based on ICD-10 criteria. J Psychosom Res. 2000 Jun;48(6):555-60. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(00)00095-7.

  • Aben I, Verhey F, Lousberg R, Lodder J, Honig A. Validity of the beck depression inventory, hospital anxiety and depression scale, SCL-90, and hamilton depression rating scale as screening instruments for depression in stroke patients. Psychosomatics. 2002 Sep-Oct;43(5):386-93. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.43.5.386.

  • Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety And Depression Scale. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Aug 1;1:29. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-29.

  • Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.

  • Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, Hogg MI. The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia. 1976 Nov;31(9):1191-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11971.x.

  • Choi-Kwon S, Han SW, Kwon SU, Kim JS. Poststroke fatigue: characteristics and related factors. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;19(2):84-90. doi: 10.1159/000082784. Epub 2004 Dec 17.

  • Okuyama T, Akechi T, Kugaya A, Okamura H, Shima Y, Maruguchi M, Hosaka T, Uchitomi Y. Development and validation of the cancer fatigue scale: a brief, three-dimensional, self-rating scale for assessment of fatigue in cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000 Jan;19(1):5-14. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(99)00138-4.

  • Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S, Eisenkraft JB, Beilin Y. The visual analog scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology. 2001 Dec;95(6):1356-61. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200112000-00013.

  • Miller KK, Combs SA, Van Puymbroeck M, Altenburger PA, Kean J, Dierks TA, Schmid AA. Fatigue and pain: relationships with physical performance and patient beliefs after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):347-55. doi: 10.1310/tsr2004-347.

  • Ozyemisci-Taskiran O, Batur EB, Yuksel S, Cengiz M, Karatas GK. Validity and reliability of fatigue severity scale in stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2019 Mar;26(2):122-127. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2018.1550957. Epub 2018 Nov 26.

  • Krupp LB, LaRocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg AD. The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol. 1989 Oct;46(10):1121-3. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1989.00520460115022.

  • Nadarajah M, Goh HT. Post-stroke fatigue: a review on prevalence, correlates, measurement, and management. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2015 Jun;22(3):208-20. doi: 10.1179/1074935714Z.0000000015. Epub 2015 Mar 17.

  • Hubacher M, Calabrese P, Bassetti C, Carota A, Stocklin M, Penner IK. Assessment of post-stroke fatigue: the fatigue scale for motor and cognitive functions. Eur Neurol. 2012;67(6):377-84. doi: 10.1159/000336736. Epub 2012 May 17.

  • Hinkle JL, Becker KJ, Kim JS, Choi-Kwon S, Saban KL, McNair N, Mead GE; American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing and Stroke Council. Poststroke Fatigue: Emerging Evidence and Approaches to Management: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association. Stroke. 2017 Jul;48(7):e159-e170. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000132. Epub 2017 May 25.

  • Elbers RG, Rietberg MB, van Wegen EE, Verhoef J, Kramer SF, Terwee CB, Kwakkel G. Self-report fatigue questionnaires in multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease and stroke: a systematic review of measurement properties. Qual Life Res. 2012 Aug;21(6):925-44. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0009-2. Epub 2011 Oct 20.

  • Moos RH, Brennan PL, Schutte KK, Moos BS. Older adults' coping with negative life events: common processes of managing health, interpersonal, and financial/work stressors. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2006;62(1):39-59. doi: 10.2190/ENLH-WAA2-AX8J-WRT1.

  • Blaauw E, Arensman E, Kraaij V, Winkel FW, Bout R. Traumatic life events and suicide risk among jail inmates: the influence of types of events, time period and significant others. J Trauma Stress. 2002 Feb;15(1):9-16. doi: 10.1023/A:1014323009493.

  • Tang WK, Chen YK, Liang HJ, Chu WC, Mok VC, Ungvari GS, Wong KS. Subcortical white matter infarcts predict 1-year outcome of fatigue in stroke. BMC Neurol. 2014 Dec 12;14:234. doi: 10.1186/s12883-014-0234-8.

  • Nadarajah M, Mazlan M, Abdul-Latif L, Goh HT. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency and concurrent validity of Fatigue Severity Scale in measuring post-stroke fatigue. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Oct;53(5):703-709. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04388-4. Epub 2016 Oct 21.

  • Barker-Collo S, Feigin VL, Dudley M. Post stroke fatigue--where is the evidence to guide practice? N Z Med J. 2007 Oct 26;120(1264):U2780.

  • Chestnut TJ. Fatigue in stroke rehabilitation patients: a pilot study. Physiother Res Int. 2011 Sep;16(3):151-8. doi: 10.1002/pri.476. Epub 2010 May 18.

  • Gordon NF, Gulanick M, Costa F, Fletcher G, Franklin BA, Roth EJ, Shephard T; American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology, Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention; the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the Stroke Council. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention; the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the Stroke Council. Circulation. 2004 Apr 27;109(16):2031-41. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000126280.65777.A4. No abstract available.

  • Schepers VP, Visser-Meily AM, Ketelaar M, Lindeman E. Poststroke fatigue: course and its relation to personal and stroke-related factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Feb;87(2):184-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.10.005.

  • van der Werf SP, van den Broek HL, Anten HW, Bleijenberg G. Experience of severe fatigue long after stroke and its relation to depressive symptoms and disease characteristics. Eur Neurol. 2001;45(1):28-33. doi: 10.1159/000052085.

  • Skaner Y, Nilsson GH, Sundquist K, Hassler E, Krakau I. Self-rated health, symptoms of depression and general symptoms at 3 and 12 months after a first-ever stroke: a municipality-based study in Sweden. BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Oct 17;8:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-61.

  • Kirkevold M, Christensen D, Andersen G, Johansen SP, Harder I. Fatigue after stroke: manifestations and strategies. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(8):665-70. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.615373. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

  • Staub F, Bogousslavsky J. Post-stroke depression or fatigue. Eur Neurol. 2001;45(1):3-5. doi: 10.1159/000052081. No abstract available.

  • De Groot MH, Phillips SJ, Eskes GA. Fatigue associated with stroke and other neurologic conditions: Implications for stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Nov;84(11):1714-20. doi: 10.1053/s0003-9993(03)00346-0.

  • Staub F, Bogousslavsky J. Fatigue after stroke: a major but neglected issue. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001 Aug;12(2):75-81. doi: 10.1159/000047685.

  • Acciarresi M, Bogousslavsky J, Paciaroni M. Post-stroke fatigue: epidemiology, clinical characteristics and treatment. Eur Neurol. 2014;72(5-6):255-61. doi: 10.1159/000363763. Epub 2014 Sep 24.

  • Cumming TB, Packer M, Kramer SF, English C. The prevalence of fatigue after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke. 2016 Dec;11(9):968-977. doi: 10.1177/1747493016669861. Epub 2016 Oct 4.

  • Stroke--1989. Recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Report of the WHO Task Force on Stroke and other Cerebrovascular Disorders. Stroke. 1989 Oct;20(10):1407-31. doi: 10.1161/01.str.20.10.1407. No abstract available.

  • Aho K, Harmsen P, Hatano S, Marquardsen J, Smirnov VE, Strasser T. Cerebrovascular disease in the community: results of a WHO collaborative study. Bull World Health Organ. 1980;58(1):113-30.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokeFatigue

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • AyÅŸe A. KĂ¼Ă§Ă¼kdeveci, Prof

    Ankara University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Mehmet TekeÅŸ, MD

CONTACT

AyÅŸe A. KĂ¼Ă§Ă¼kdeveci, MD, Prof

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Target Duration
1 Day
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2025

First Posted

November 17, 2025

Study Start

November 21, 2024

Primary Completion

January 29, 2026

Study Completion

January 29, 2026

Last Updated

November 17, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Locations