DCB vs. DES in Young STEMI Patients: The DCB-STEMI Trial
DCB-STEMI
Drug Coated Balloon vs. Drug Eluting Stent in Young Patients With STEMI: The DCB-STEMI Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
496
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) in young adults (\<50 yrs) carries high Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) risks. While drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce restenosis versus angioplasty, they increase risks of in-stent restenosis, thrombosis, prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), and endothelial dysfunction. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) provide a "leave nothing behind" strategy, potentially mitigating these issues. Evidence, including a JACC CVI report, suggests DCB outcomes comparable to DES in STEMI. South Asia faces a heavy burden. The national Institute of Cardiovascular diseases (NICVD), Karachi performed 17,761 primary PCIs in 2022, with 45% in patients \<50 yrs. Study Design: This single-center Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) compares paclitaxel-coated DCB (3.0 µg/mm², 30s inflation) vs. Drug eluting stents (DES) in young STEMI patients (\<50 yrs) undergoing primary PCI. The primary endpoint is 1-year vessel oriented cardiac events (VOCE)= Cardiovascular /all-cause death, target vessel MI, or Target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary endpoints include vessel-oriented CV events, bleeding, TIMI III flow, residual stenosis, abrupt closure, and bailout stenting. An intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy (100 DCB pts) will evaluate remodeling and late lumen loss (LLL) at 6 months. Methods: 496 patients (248/arm) will be randomized 1:1, powered for non-inferiority (margin 4.5%) assuming VOCE 8.5% (DES) vs. 6.25% (DCB), 80% power, and 5% dropout. Inclusion: age 18-50, STEMI. Exclusion: End stage renal disease (ESRD), severe multivessel disease, complex lesions, or high thrombus burden. All will receive ticagrelor 90 mg BID for 1 month. A pilot of 50 pts will first assess safety (abrupt closure, lesion prep). Analysis: Intention-to-treat (ITT) will be primary; modified ITT for secondary endpoints. Statistics include chi-square/Fisher for categorical, t-test/Wilcoxon for continuous, and Kaplan-Meier/Cox for survival. Oversight by data safety monitoring board (DSMB) and Events adjudication Committee (EAC). Significance: This trial leverages NICVD's high PCI volume to test DCB as an alternative to DES in young STEMI patients. By avoiding permanent implants, DCB may reduce long-term complications and DAPT needs. The IVUS substudy and pilot phase strengthen rigor. If non-inferiority is proven, DCB could reshape STEMI management in South Asia and similar high-burden regions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Nov 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 18, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 5, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 14, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 17, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 26, 2027
November 14, 2025
November 1, 2025
2.1 years
September 18, 2025
November 13, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
VOCE
Composite of CV death, Target Vessel MI (including stent thrombosis) and TLR
one year
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Proportion of Patients Experiencing Individual Components of Vessel-Oriented Composite Endpoint (VOCE)
one year
Proportion of Patients Achieving TIMI III Flow Post-Procedure
immediate post procedure
Proportion of Patients with Angiographic Residual Stenosis Exceeding Thresholds (>30% for DCB, >20% for DES)
Immediate post procedure
Rate of Abrupt Vessel Closure Post-Procedure
within 24 hours post procedure
Proportion of Patients Requiring Bail-Out Stenting in the DCB Arm
intra procedure
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
Mean Late Lumen Loss in the DCB Arm at 6 Months Post-Procedure
6 months
Mean Minimum Lumen Diameter in the DCB Arm at Baseline, Post-Procedure, and 6 Months
Baseline (pre-DCB), immediately post-procedure, and 6 months post-procedure
Mean Percent Diameter Stenosis in the DCB Arm at Baseline, Post-Procedure, and 6 Months
Baseline (pre-DCB), immediately post-procedure, and 6 months post-procedure
Study Arms (2)
DCB arm (Prevail Drug Coated Balloon)
EXPERIMENTALPatients assigned to drug coated balloon
DES arm (Limus drug eluting stent)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receiving standard of care Drug eluting stent
Interventions
Drug coated balloon (Prevail DCB, Medtronic Inc.)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Either gender
- Patient of age between 18 to 50 years
- Patients with STEMI ( as first presentation of CAD) undergoing Primary PCI
- Total ischemic Time less than 8 hrs.
- Low syntax score
- Stable (Killip I-II)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with ESRD
- Severe 3 VD; Intermediate of High syntax score
- Lesion type\>B
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases
Karachi, Pakistan
Related Publications (3)
Mangner N, Farah A, Ohlow MA, Mobius-Winkler S, Weilenmann D, Wohrle J, Linke A, Stachel G, Markovic S, Leibundgut G, Rickenbacher P, Cattaneo M, Gilgen N, Kaiser C, Scheller B, Jeger RV; BASKET-SMALL 2 Investigators. Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloons Versus Drug-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Prespecified Analysis of BASKET-SMALL 2. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;15(2):e011325. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011325. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
PMID: 35000455RESULTHuang KN, Grandi SM, Filion KB, Eisenberg MJ. Late and very late stent thrombosis in patients with second-generation drug-eluting stents. Can J Cardiol. 2013 Nov;29(11):1488-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
PMID: 23830291RESULTMcKavanagh P, Zawadowski G, Ahmed N, Kutryk M. The evolution of coronary stents. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2018 Mar;16(3):219-228. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2018.1435274. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
PMID: 29381087RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abdul Hakeem, MD
NICVD
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Endpoint assessment will be blinded ie the adjudication committee members will be blinded to treatment allocation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor and Program Director, Interventional Cardiology, Director Cardiac Catheterization Labs
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 18, 2025
First Posted
November 14, 2025
Study Start
November 5, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 17, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 26, 2027
Last Updated
November 14, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- After the publication of the results untill 2 hours.
- Access Criteria
- IPD will be shared upon reasonable request and submission to the PI. The proposition will be formally reviewed by the steering committee.
IPD will be shared upon reasonable request and submission to the PI. The proposition will be formally reviewed by the steering committee.