NCT07226167

Brief Summary

Researchers are doing this study to understand why hearing aids often work well in controlled laboratory settings but don't provide the same level of benefit in everyday noisy environments. The questions they hope to answer are:

  • What factors contribute to hearing aid benefit in noisy environments
  • What factors limit hearing aid benefit
  • How do real-world factors interact with common hearing aid settings Participants will complete:
  • Hearing and listening tests
  • Memory and attention assessment
  • Surveys on their Smartphone

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
45

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
8mo left

Started Feb 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress25%
Feb 2026Jan 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 3, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 10, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 19, 2026

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 24, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

November 3, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 20, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Compare effectiveness of hearing aid signal enhancement on speech perception

    Participants will hear 3 different, 5 minute listening scenarios and answer the same survey questions for each. They will rate perception from 0% (understood nothing) to 100% (understood everything). Percentages will be compared across the 3 scenarios.

    1 week

  • Compare effectiveness of hearing aid signal enhancement on listening effort

    Participants will hear 3 different, 5 minute listening scenarios and answer the same survey questions for each. They will rate how hard they had to work to understand what was said from 0% (no effort) to 100% (extremely hard). Percentages will be compared across the 3 scenarios.

    1 week

  • Compare effectiveness of hearing aid signal enhancement on listening comfort

    Participants will hear 3 different, 5 minute listening scenarios and answer the same survey questions for each. They will rate how comfortable it was to listen from 0% (very comfortable) to 100% (very uncomfortable). Percentages will be compared across the 3 scenarios.

    1 week

  • Compare effectiveness of hearing aid signal enhancement on sound quality

    Participants will hear 3 different, 5 minute listening scenarios and answer the same survey questions for each. They will rate the sound quality from 0% (very poor) to 100% (excellent). Percentages will be compared across the 3 scenarios.

    1 week

  • Compare effectiveness of hearing aid signal enhancement on sound location

    Participants will hear 3 different, 5 minute listening scenarios and answer the same survey questions for each. They will rate how easy it was to tell where the sound was coming from, from 0% (could not tell) to 100% (very easy). Percentages will be compared across the 3 scenarios.

    1 week

  • Compare effectiveness of hearing aid algorithms based on location

    Participants will complete the same survey questions for all three algorithms. Participants will select which option best describes the environment they are in when completing the hearing survey.

    1 week

Study Arms (1)

Hearing aid + smartphone surveys

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will use study-provided hearing aids

Device: Hearing aid

Interventions

Participants will use study-provided hearing aids for 15 minutes, 7-10 times for a week.

Hearing aid + smartphone surveys

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Over 18 years old
  • Symmetrical, bilateral, adult onset, sensorineural hearing loss
  • Experienced hearing aid users (\> 3 months)

You may not qualify if:

  • Under 18 years old
  • Conductive or mixed hearing loss
  • Asymmetrical or unilateral hearing loss
  • Pre-lingual or childhood hearing loss onset
  • No hearing aid experience

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Wisconsin - Madison

Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, United States

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss

Interventions

Hearing Aids

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hearing DisordersEar DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wearable Electronic DevicesElectrical Equipment and SuppliesEquipment and SuppliesSensory Aids

Study Officials

  • Erik Jorgensen, AuD, PhD

    University of Wisconsin, Madison

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Lucas Modahl

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2025

First Posted

November 10, 2025

Study Start

February 19, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 24, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Locations