Valproate for the Treatment of Residual Amblyopia
VARA
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the efficacy of valproate as an adjunct therapy to treat amblyopia beyond the critical period in children aged 8-17 years who have amblyopia of ≥3 lines of interocular best-corrected (with glasses) visual acuity difference. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does valproate enable clinically meaningful and durable visual recovery from amblyopia?
- Do valproate-treated patients show a change in amblyopic eye visual acuity (lines)? Participants will undergo daily patching for 2 hours (standard of care) plus the addition of valproate or placebo for a total of 16 weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Jan 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 26, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2027
November 10, 2025
September 1, 2025
1.7 years
September 26, 2025
November 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Amblyopic Eye Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
Change in visual acuity of the amblyopic eye after 8 weeks of treatment with valproate plus patching versus placebo plus patching.
The comparison will be made between the randomized groups at the 8-week visit, prior to cross-over.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Proportion of patients with resolved amblyopia
8 weeks
Durability of amblyopic eye visual acuity response
8 weeks
Change in stereoacuity
8 weeks and 16 weeks
Quality of life measures using the Pediatric Eye Questionnaire (PedEyeQ)
Change from baseline at 8 weeks and 16 weeks.
Tolerability and Safety of Valproate
Assessed throughout the study duration at 1,2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14 and 16 weeks.
Study Arms (2)
Arm 1 - Placebo first
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants randomized to Arm 1 will receive oral placebo (250 mg twice daily) in combination with 2 hours of prescribed daily patching for 8 weeks. At the 8-week visit, participants will cross over to oral valproate at an initial dose of 15 mg/kg/day divided twice daily, while continuing the prescribed 2 hours of daily patching for an additional 8 weeks. Dose escalation of valproate up to 30 mg/kg/day (or placebo to 500 mg mice daily) will be permitted at interim visits if visual acuity has not improved and no adverse effects are present. All study medication will be discontinued after 16 weeks, with patching also discontinued at that time.
Arm 2 - Valproate first
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomized to Arm 2 will receive oral valproate at an initial dose of 15 mg/kg/day divided twice daily, together with 2 hours of prescribed daily patching for 8 weeks. At the 8-week visit, participants will cross over to oral placebo (250 mg twice daily) while continuing 2 hours of daily patching for an additional 8 weeks. If visual acuity has not improved at interim visits and no adverse effects are observed, the valproate dose may be escalated up to 30 mg/kg/day during the initial treatment phase, or placebo increased to 500 mg twice daily during the cross-over phase. After 16 weeks, both study medication and patching will be discontinued.
Interventions
Valproate is an anti-epileptic medication used in this study to treat amblyopia. Participants will receive valproate in oral tablet form. The dosage will be determined based on the participant's weight and age, following standard dosing guidelines for valproate. The medication will be administered daily for a duration of 8 weeks. Participants will be monitored for any adverse effects, and dosage adjustments will be made if necessary to ensure safety and tolerability.
The placebo intervention consists of an inert substance designed to mimic the appearance and administration of valproate tablets. Participants in the placebo group will receive the placebo tablets daily for the same duration of 8 weeks. This control group will help to assess the efficacy of valproate by comparing outcomes between the valproate and placebo groups. Participants receiving the placebo will also be monitored for any adverse effects to ensure the study's integrity and participant safety.
Patching is a standard treatment for amblyopia, involving the occlusion of the fellow eye to stimulate the amblyopic eye. Participants will be required to patch their fellow eye for 2 hours daily throughout the 16-week study period. The patching regimen aims to improve visual acuity in the amblyopic eye by encouraging its use. Compliance with the patching protocol will be monitored, and participants will be provided with instructions and support to ensure proper application and adherence to the treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 8-17 years
- Amblyopia associated with strabismus and/or anisometropia
- Criteria for strabismus: must meet at least one of the following:
- Heterotropia at distance and/or near with or without spectacle correction
- History of strabismus surgery
- Documented history of strabismus that is no longer present and felt by the investigator could have caused the amblyopia
- Criteria for anisometropia: must meet at least one of the following:
- ≥ 0.50 D difference in spherical equivalent between eyes
- ≥ 1.50 D difference in astigmatism in any meridian between the eyes
- Visual acuity measured in each eye within 7 days prior to enrollment using ETDRS protocol on a study certified visual acuity tester as follows:
- Amblyopic eye visual acuity of 20/40 - 20/400
- Sound eye acuity of ≥ 20/25.
- Current amblyopia treatment (other than spectacle correction)
- Subjects actively patching at the time of enrollment screening should continue patching through enrollment
- Visual acuity in amblyopic eye has not improved ≥ 1 line (5 letters) by the same testing method from a previous visit ≥ 8 weeks earlier while on treatment
- +55 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Boston Children's Waltham
Waltham, Massachusetts, 02453, United States
Related Publications (54)
Stewart CE, Fielder AR, Stephens DA, Moseley MJ. Treatment of unilateral amblyopia: factors influencing visual outcome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Sep;46(9):3152-60. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0357.
PMID: 16123414BACKGROUNDWoodruff G, Hiscox F, Thompson JR, Smith LK. Factors affecting the outcome of children treated for amblyopia. Eye (Lond). 1994;8 ( Pt 6):627-31. doi: 10.1038/eye.1994.157.
PMID: 7867817BACKGROUNDHolmes JM, Levi DM. Treatment of amblyopia as a function of age. Vis Neurosci. 2018 Jan;35:E015. doi: 10.1017/S0952523817000220.
PMID: 29905125BACKGROUNDAshrafi MR, Shabanian R, Zamani GR, Mahfelati F. Sodium Valproate versus Propranolol in paediatric migraine prophylaxis. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2005;9(5):333-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2005.05.004. Epub 2005 Aug 24.
PMID: 16120482BACKGROUNDMattson RH, Cramer JA, Williamson PD, Novelly RA. Valproic acid in epilepsy: clinical and pharmacological effects. Ann Neurol. 1978 Jan;3(1):20-5. doi: 10.1002/ana.410030105.
PMID: 350128BACKGROUNDTomson T, Marson A, Boon P, Canevini MP, Covanis A, Gaily E, Kalviainen R, Trinka E. Valproate in the treatment of epilepsy in girls and women of childbearing potential. Epilepsia. 2015 Jul;56(7):1006-19. doi: 10.1111/epi.13021. Epub 2015 May 16.
PMID: 25851171BACKGROUNDHiilesmaa VK, Bardy AH, Granstrom ML, Teramo KA. Valproic acid during pregnancy. Lancet. 1980 Apr 19;1(8173):883. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)91387-2. No abstract available.
PMID: 6103246BACKGROUNDNau H, Hauck RS, Ehlers K. Valproic acid-induced neural tube defects in mouse and human: aspects of chirality, alternative drug development, pharmacokinetics and possible mechanisms. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1991 Nov;69(5):310-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1991.tb01303.x.
PMID: 1803343BACKGROUNDCotariu D, Zaidman JL. Developmental toxicity of valproic acid. Life Sci. 1991;48(14):1341-50. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(91)90430-j.
PMID: 2008152BACKGROUNDShoshany TN, Michalak S, Staffa SJ, Chinn RN, Bishop K, Hunter DG. Effect of Primary Occlusion Therapy in Asymmetric, Bilateral Amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;211:87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.10.030. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
PMID: 31712066BACKGROUNDChinn RN, Wilkinson CL, Staffa SJ, Michalak SM, Shoshany TN, Bishop K, Hunter DG, Gaier ED. Amblyopia treatment outcomes in patients with neurodevelopmental disorders. J AAPOS. 2023 Oct;27(5):276.e1-276.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.07.014. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
PMID: 37739211BACKGROUNDMorrison DG, Heidary G, Chang MY, Binenbaum G, Cavuoto KM, Galvin J, Trivedi R, Kim SJ, Pineles SL. Levodopa/Carbidopa to Augment the Treatment of Amblyopia: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2023 Nov;130(11):1221-1227. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.07.008. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
PMID: 37642618BACKGROUNDSharif MH, Talebnejad MR, Rastegar K, Khalili MR, Nowroozzadeh MH. Oral fluoxetine in the management of amblyopic patients aged between 10 and 40 years old: a randomized clinical trial. Eye (Lond). 2019 Jul;33(7):1060-1067. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0360-z. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
PMID: 30783259BACKGROUNDHuttunen HJ, Palva JM, Lindberg L, Palva S, Saarela V, Karvonen E, Latvala ML, Liinamaa J, Booms S, Castren E, Uusitalo H. Fluoxetine does not enhance the effect of perceptual learning on visual function in adults with amblyopia. Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 27;8(1):12830. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31169-z.
PMID: 30150750BACKGROUNDChung STL, Li RW, Silver MA, Levi DM. Donepezil Does Not Enhance Perceptual Learning in Adults with Amblyopia: A Pilot Study. Front Neurosci. 2017 Aug 7;11:448. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00448. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28824369BACKGROUNDWu C, Gaier ED, Nihalani BR, Whitecross S, Hensch TK, Hunter DG. Durable recovery from amblyopia with donepezil. Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 22;13(1):10161. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34891-5.
PMID: 37349338BACKGROUNDProcianoy E, Fuchs FD, Procianoy L, Procianoy F. The effect of increasing doses of levodopa on children with strabismic amblyopia. J AAPOS. 1999 Dec;3(6):337-40. doi: 10.1016/s1091-8531(99)70041-8.
PMID: 10613576BACKGROUNDMohan K, Dhankar V, Sharma A. Visual acuities after levodopa administration in amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2001 Mar-Apr;38(2):62-7; quiz 96-7. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-20010301-05.
PMID: 11310708BACKGROUNDLeguire LE, Walson PD, Rogers GL, Bremer DL, McGregor ML. Levodopa/carbidopa treatment for amblyopia in older children. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1995 May-Jun;32(3):143-51. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19950501-05.
PMID: 7636693BACKGROUNDLeguire LE, Walson PD, Rogers GL, Bremer DL, McGregor ML. Longitudinal study of levodopa/carbidopa for childhood amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1993 Nov-Dec;30(6):354-60. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19931101-04.
PMID: 8120739BACKGROUNDLeguire LE, Rogers GL, Walson PD, Bremer DL, McGregor ML. Occlusion and levodopa-carbidopa treatment for childhood amblyopia. J AAPOS. 1998 Oct;2(5):257-64. doi: 10.1016/s1091-8531(98)90080-5.
PMID: 10646745BACKGROUNDChatzistefanou KI, Mills MD. The role of drug treatment in children with strabismus and amblyopia. Paediatr Drugs. 2000 Mar-Apr;2(2):91-100. doi: 10.2165/00148581-200002020-00002.
PMID: 10937461BACKGROUNDYang EJ, Lin EW, Hensch TK. Critical period for acoustic preference in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):17213-20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200705109. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
PMID: 23045690BACKGROUNDGervain J, Vines BW, Chen LM, Seo RJ, Hensch TK, Werker JF, Young AH. Valproate reopens critical-period learning of absolute pitch. Front Syst Neurosci. 2013 Dec 3;7:102. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00102. eCollection 2013.
PMID: 24348349BACKGROUNDLennartsson A, Arner E, Fagiolini M, Saxena A, Andersson R, Takahashi H, Noro Y, Sng J, Sandelin A, Hensch TK, Carninci P. Remodeling of retrotransposon elements during epigenetic induction of adult visual cortical plasticity by HDAC inhibitors. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2015 Dec 14;8:55. doi: 10.1186/s13072-015-0043-3. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26673794BACKGROUNDShmal D, Mantero G, Floss T, Benfenati F, Maya-Vetencourt JF. Restoring vision in adult amblyopia by enhancing plasticity through deletion of the transcriptional repressor REST. iScience. 2024 Mar 14;27(4):109507. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109507. eCollection 2024 Apr 19.
PMID: 38591011BACKGROUNDSilingardi D, Scali M, Belluomini G, Pizzorusso T. Epigenetic treatments of adult rats promote recovery from visual acuity deficits induced by long-term monocular deprivation. Eur J Neurosci. 2010 Jun;31(12):2185-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07261.x. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
PMID: 20550570BACKGROUNDPutignano E, Lonetti G, Cancedda L, Ratto G, Costa M, Maffei L, Pizzorusso T. Developmental downregulation of histone posttranslational modifications regulates visual cortical plasticity. Neuron. 2007 Mar 1;53(5):747-59. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.007.
PMID: 17329213BACKGROUNDMonti B, Polazzi E, Contestabile A. Biochemical, molecular and epigenetic mechanisms of valproic acid neuroprotection. Curr Mol Pharmacol. 2009 Jan;2(1):95-109. doi: 10.2174/1874467210902010095.
PMID: 20021450BACKGROUNDPenney J, Tsai LH. Histone deacetylases in memory and cognition. Sci Signal. 2014 Dec 9;7(355):re12. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aaa0069.
PMID: 25492968BACKGROUNDGaier ED, Hunter DG. Advances in Amblyopia Treatment: Paradigm Shifts and Future Directions. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2017 Fall;57(4):117-128. doi: 10.1097/IIO.0000000000000184. No abstract available.
PMID: 28885251BACKGROUNDFalcone MM, Hunter DG, Gaier ED. Emerging therapies for amblyopia. Semin Ophthalmol. 2021 May 19;36(4):282-288. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1893765. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
PMID: 33656963BACKGROUNDHolmes JM, Beck RW, Kraker RT, Astle WF, Birch EE, Cole SR, Cotter SA, Donahue S, Everett DF, Hertle RW, Keech RV, Paysse E, Quinn GF, Repka MX, Scheiman MM; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Risk of amblyopia recurrence after cessation of treatment. J AAPOS. 2004 Oct;8(5):420-8. doi: 10.1016/S1091853104001612.
PMID: 15492733BACKGROUNDBhola R, Keech RV, Kutschke P, Pfeifer W, Scott WE. Recurrence of amblyopia after occlusion therapy. Ophthalmology. 2006 Nov;113(11):2097-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.04.034.
PMID: 17074568BACKGROUNDKelly KR, Jost RM, Wang YZ, Dao L, Beauchamp CL, Leffler JN, Birch EE. Improved Binocular Outcomes Following Binocular Treatment for Childhood Amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Mar 1;59(3):1221-1228. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-23235.
PMID: 29625442BACKGROUNDGiaschi D, Chapman C, Meier K, Narasimhan S, Regan D. The effect of occlusion therapy on motion perception deficits in amblyopia. Vision Res. 2015 Sep;114:122-34. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.05.015. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
PMID: 26049038BACKGROUNDStewart CE, Moseley MJ, Georgiou P, Fielder AR. Occlusion dose monitoring in amblyopia therapy: status, insights, and future directions. J AAPOS. 2017 Oct;21(5):402-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
PMID: 28890077BACKGROUNDRepka MX, Wallace DK, Beck RW, Kraker RT, Birch EE, Cotter SA, Donahue S, Everett DF, Hertle RW, Holmes JM, Quinn GE, Scheiman MM, Weakley DR; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Two-year follow-up of a 6-month randomized trial of atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Feb;123(2):149-57. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.2.149.
PMID: 15710809BACKGROUNDWallace DK; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group; Edwards AR, Cotter SA, Beck RW, Arnold RW, Astle WF, Barnhardt CN, Birch EE, Donahue SP, Everett DF, Felius J, Holmes JM, Kraker RT, Melia M, Repka MX, Sala NA, Silbert DI, Weise KK. A randomized trial to evaluate 2 hours of daily patching for strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology. 2006 Jun;113(6):904-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.069.
PMID: 16751033BACKGROUNDHolmes JM, Lazar EL, Melia BM, Astle WF, Dagi LR, Donahue SP, Frazier MG, Hertle RW, Repka MX, Quinn GE, Weise KK; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Effect of age on response to amblyopia treatment in children. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Nov;129(11):1451-7. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.179. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
PMID: 21746970BACKGROUNDStewart CE, Moseley MJ, Stephens DA, Fielder AR. Treatment dose-response in amblyopia therapy: the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Sep;45(9):3048-54. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0250.
PMID: 15326120BACKGROUNDPediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group Writing Committee; Rutstein RP, Quinn GE, Lazar EL, Beck RW, Bonsall DJ, Cotter SA, Crouch ER, Holmes JM, Hoover DL, Leske DA, Lorenzana IJ, Repka MX, Suh DW. A randomized trial comparing Bangerter filters and patching for the treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology. 2010 May;117(5):998-1004.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.10.014. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
PMID: 20163869BACKGROUNDHolmes JM, Kraker RT, Beck RW, Birch EE, Cotter SA, Everett DF, Hertle RW, Quinn GE, Repka MX, Scheiman MM, Wallace DK; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A randomized trial of prescribed patching regimens for treatment of severe amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology. 2003 Nov;110(11):2075-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.08.001.
PMID: 14597512BACKGROUNDRepka MX, Beck RW, Holmes JM, Birch EE, Chandler DL, Cotter SA, Hertle RW, Kraker RT, Moke PS, Quinn GE, Scheiman MM; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. A randomized trial of patching regimens for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 May;121(5):603-11. doi: 10.1001/archopht.121.5.603.
PMID: 12742836BACKGROUNDPediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group.. A randomized trial of atropine vs. patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Mar;120(3):268-78. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.3.268.
PMID: 11879129BACKGROUNDHatt SR, Leske DA, Castaneda YS, Wernimont SM, Liebermann L, Cheng-Patel CS, Birch EE, Holmes JM. Understanding the Impact of Residual Amblyopia on Functional Vision and Eye-related Quality of Life Using the PedEyeQ. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct;218:173-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.05.039. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
PMID: 32511967BACKGROUNDGonzalez EG, Wong AM, Niechwiej-Szwedo E, Tarita-Nistor L, Steinbach MJ. Eye position stability in amblyopia and in normal binocular vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Aug 9;53(9):5386-94. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9941.
PMID: 22789926BACKGROUNDChung ST, Kumar G, Li RW, Levi DM. Characteristics of fixational eye movements in amblyopia: Limitations on fixation stability and acuity? Vision Res. 2015 Sep;114:87-99. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.01.016. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
PMID: 25668775BACKGROUNDSubramanian V, Jost RM, Birch EE. A quantitative study of fixation stability in amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Mar 19;54(3):1998-2003. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-11054.
PMID: 23372053BACKGROUNDBirch EE, Kelly KR, Giaschi DE. Fellow Eye Deficits in Amblyopia. J Binocul Vis Ocul Motil. 2019 Jul-Sep;69(3):116-125. doi: 10.1080/2576117X.2019.1624440. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
PMID: 31161888BACKGROUNDBirch EE, Jost RM, Wang YZ, Kelly KR, Giaschi DE. Impaired Fellow Eye Motion Perception and Abnormal Binocular Function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019 Aug 1;60(10):3374-3380. doi: 10.1167/iovs.19-26885.
PMID: 31387113BACKGROUNDKelly KR, Cheng-Patel CS, Jost RM, Wang YZ, Birch EE. Fixation instability during binocular viewing in anisometropic and strabismic children. Exp Eye Res. 2019 Jun;183:29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
PMID: 30006273BACKGROUNDMcKee SP, Levi DM, Movshon JA. The pattern of visual deficits in amblyopia. J Vis. 2003;3(5):380-405. doi: 10.1167/3.5.5.
PMID: 12875634BACKGROUNDBirch EE. Amblyopia and binocular vision. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2013 Mar;33:67-84. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.11.001. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
PMID: 23201436BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eric D Gaier, MD, PhD
Boston Children's Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Participants, caregivers, investigators, and study staff conducting outcome assessments are all masked to treatment assignment. Study medication (valproate or placebo) is dispensed in identical-appearing capsules and bottles prepared by the research pharmacy. Randomization is managed via a secure web-based system, and treatment codes are not accessible to investigators or participants. Unmasking may only occur in the event of a medical emergency when knowledge of the treatment assignment is essential for subject safety.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2025
First Posted
November 10, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2027
Last Updated
November 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- The individual participant data (IPD) and supporting information will be available to qualified researchers starting 6 months after the publication of the primary study results. The data will remain accessible for 5 years from the start date. Researchers must submit a formal request, which will be reviewed for ethical and scientific alignment. This plan ensures valuable data contributes to advancements in amblyopia treatment while maintaining confidentiality.
- Access Criteria
- Who Will Be Able to Access: Qualified researchers from academic institutions, research organizations, and healthcare institutions will be able to access the IPD and supporting information. Access will be granted based on the submission and approval of a formal request. What They Will Be Able to Access: Researchers will have access to de-identified individual participant data, including: Demographic information Clinical outcomes Visual acuity measurements Stereoacuity results Quality of life assessments Adverse event reports How They Will Be Able to Access: Researchers must submit a formal request detailing their study purpose and intended use of the data. The request will be reviewed by our study team for ethical and scientific alignment. Approved researchers will be granted access to the data through a secure online repository that complies with data protection regulations. Access will be restricted to the approved research purposes, and data sharing with third parties will require
We plan to share individual participant data (IPD) with qualified researchers to promote transparency and further research. Data will be de-identified to ensure privacy and confidentiality. Researchers must submit a formal request outlining their study purpose and intended use of the data. Requests will be reviewed by our study team for ethical and scientific alignment. Data will be shared through a secure online repository, accessible to approved researchers. Shared data will include demographic information, clinical outcomes, visual acuity measurements, stereoacuity results, quality of life assessments, and adverse event reports. Researchers must agree to use the data solely for approved purposes and not share it with third parties without consent. Researchers are encouraged to publish their findings in peer-reviewed journals and acknowledge the original study and investigators.