NCT07225920

Brief Summary

A geriatric assessment (GA) is a structured approach to identifying and addressing the strengths and vulnerabilities of older adults with cancer. They can improve the quality of cancer care for older adults and lower side effects. It is recommended a GA be administered prior to the start of non-hormonal systemic therapy for all older adults. Despite these guidelines, only a small percentage of practices report administering them. The practical geriatric assessment (PGA) was developed to help oncology practices perform GAs. It aims to provide a brief way to evaluate older patients' physical health along with other important things like support network and impact to the patient's daily life. Typically, clinics do not receive extra training on delivering the PGA. Providing training and support for staff at cancer clinics may help deliver the enhanced PGA to older adult cancer patients who are starting a new-hormonal systemic therapy. This clinical trial looks at whether providing training and support for staff at cancer clinics can help them deliver patient check-ups (e.g., PGA) specifically designed for adults \>= 65 years old (older adults) starting a new non-hormonal systemic cancer therapy. The usual approach clinics use when starting these cancer therapy courses with an older adult may vary considerably.

Trial Health

78
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
216

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
20mo left

Started Jan 2026

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

27 active sites

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress16%
Jan 2026Dec 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 6, 2025

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 10, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 14, 2026

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2027

Expected
10 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

April 8, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

November 6, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 6, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Qualitative feedback on the practical geriatric assessment (PGA) implementation strategies within the context of the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (Part 1)

    Thematic analysis will be used to identify suggested modifications that could be used to optimize acceptability of PGA implementation strategies. Intervention materials and implementation strategies will then be refined based on this feedback for further evaluation in the Part 2 Pilot Study.

    Up to 6 months after the start of Part 1

  • Acceptability of PGA implementation strategies (Part 2)

    Acceptability of PGA implementation strategies will be assessed qualitatively during the clinic debrief meeting for those able to attend the meeting. If a participant is unable to attend the meeting, acceptability will instead be assessed quantitatively using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) via a REDCap survey. In this case, acceptability will be defined as a score of at least 4 on the AIM. Overall, PGA implementation strategies will be considered acceptable if the majority of participants at the debrief meeting for each clinic agree that the strategies are acceptable. If this metric is not met, strategies will be further refined before the start of the future randomized trial.

    6 months after the start of Part 2

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Key mechanisms, intervention components, facilitators, and barriers that could inform future implementation strategies and potential modifications (Part 1)

    Up to 6 months after the start of Part 1

  • Patient participation rate (Part 2)

    Up to 6 months after the start of Part 2

  • Patient survey response rate (Part 2)

    Up to 6 months after the start of Part 2

  • Appropriateness of the PGA implementation strategies (Part 2)

    6 months after the start of Part 2

  • Feasibility of completing the PGA with implementation strategies (Part 2)

    6 months after the start of Part 2

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Part 1 (stakeholder interview)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants from practices selected for participation in Part 1 complete a stakeholder interview (approximately 60 minutes) to gather information on current PGA relevant processes within the practice, including any anticipated barriers or facilitators to delivery, and provide feedback on proposed implementation strategies.

Other: Survey AdministrationOther: Interview

Part 2 (PGA education, management, and support EHR review)

EXPERIMENTAL

See Detailed Description

Other: Survey AdministrationOther: Educational InterventionOther: AssessmentOther: Internet-Based InterventionOther: Electronic Health Record ReviewOther: Interview

Interventions

Complete interest survey

Part 1 (stakeholder interview)Part 2 (PGA education, management, and support EHR review)

Complete stakeholder interview

Part 1 (stakeholder interview)

Receive provider education

Also known as: Education for Intervention, Intervention by Education, Intervention through Education, Intervention, Educational
Part 2 (PGA education, management, and support EHR review)

Start or increase PGA and GA management

Also known as: Assess, Assessment, assessment, assessment, assessment, Study Assessment, Study Observation
Part 2 (PGA education, management, and support EHR review)

Attend virtual meetings

Part 2 (PGA education, management, and support EHR review)

Complete EHR reviews

Part 2 (PGA education, management, and support EHR review)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • PART 1 ONCOLOGY CLINICIANS: Must be an oncology clinician (MDs, DOs, APPs (e.g. NP, PA)) who administers systemic therapy (chemotherapy, immunotherapy or targeted therapy).
  • PART 1 ONCOLOGY CLINICIANS: Must be involved in the planning or delivery of new systemic therapies (e.g. chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy) to patients including those \>= 65 years old
  • PART 1 ONCOLOGY CLINICIANS: Must be willing to participate in a semi-structured interview (approximately 60 minutes; remotely over the internet or by phone)
  • PART 1 ONCOLOGY CLINICIANS: Concurrent participation in URCC-19170 is allowed, not required
  • PART 1 ONCOLOGY CLINICIANS: Must be able to read, understand and speak English
  • PART 1 ONCOLOGY SUPPORT STAFF STAKEHOLDER: Nurse, practice manager, or other oncology support staff who work with oncology clinicians who provide systemic therapy, help with office workflows for patient screeners, or help patients with referrals (including patients age 65 or older). May include staff that have a dual role in research and clinical support
  • PART 1 ONCOLOGY SUPPORT STAFF STAKEHOLDER: Must be willing to participate in a semi-structured interview (approximately 60 minutes; remotely over the internet or by phone)
  • PART 1 ONCOLOGY SUPPORT STAFF STAKEHOLDER: Concurrent participation in URCC-19170 is allowed, not required
  • PART 1 ONCOLOGY SUPPORT STAFF STAKEHOLDER: Must be able to read, understand and speak English
  • PART 1 PATIENT STAKEHOLDER: \>= 65 years of age
  • PART 1 PATIENT STAKEHOLDER: Must have initiated a new line of chemo-/immuno- and/or targeted therapy in the last 12 months
  • PART 1 PATIENT STAKEHOLDER: Must be willing to participate in a semi-structured interview (approximately 60 minutes; or remotely over the internet or by phone)
  • PART 1 PATIENT STAKEHOLDER: Concurrent participation in URCC-19170 is allowed, not required
  • PART 1 PATIENT STAKEHOLDER: Must be able to understand and speak English
  • PART 1 CAREGIVER STAKEHOLDER: Must self-report as having cared for a patient 65 years or older who initiated systemic treatment (e.g. chemo-, immuno- and/or targeted therapy) in the last 12 months. To allow for differences in how the term "caregiver" is used, we will include any family member, significant other, or friend who helps during their cancer treatment, regardless of whether they define themselves as a caregiver
  • +28 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (27)

Lewis and Faye Manderson Cancer Center

Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35401, United States

Location

Mercy Hospital Fort Smith

Fort Smith, Arkansas, 72903, United States

Location

NEA Baptist Memorial Hospital and Fowler Family Cancer Center - Jonesboro

Jonesboro, Arkansas, 72401, United States

Location

MaineHealth Maine Medical Center- Scarborough

Scarborough, Maine, 04074, United States

Location

Trinity Health IHA Medical Group Hematology Oncology - Brighton

Brighton, Michigan, 48114, United States

Location

Trinity Health IHA Medical Group Hematology Oncology - Canton

Canton, Michigan, 48188, United States

Location

Trinity Health IHA Medical Group Hematology Oncology - Chelsea Hospital

Chelsea, Michigan, 48118, United States

Location

Trinity Health Saint Mary Mercy Livonia Hospital

Livonia, Michigan, 48154, United States

Location

Trinity Health IHA Medical Group Hematology Oncology Ann Arbor Campus

Ypsilanti, Michigan, 48197, United States

Location

Baptist Memorial Hospital and Cancer Center-Golden Triangle

Columbus, Mississippi, 39705, United States

Location

Baptist Cancer Center-Grenada

Grenada, Mississippi, 38901, United States

Location

Baptist Memorial Hospital and Cancer Center-Union County

New Albany, Mississippi, 39705, United States

Location

Baptist Memorial Hospital and Cancer Center-Oxford

Oxford, Mississippi, 38655, United States

Location

Baptist Memorial Hospital and Cancer Center-Desoto

Southaven, Mississippi, 38671, United States

Location

Novant Health Cancer Institute - Kernersville

Kernersville, North Carolina, 27284, United States

Location

Wake Forest NCORP Research Base

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States

Location

Baptist Memorial Hospital and Cancer Center-Collierville

Collierville, Tennessee, 38017, United States

Location

Baptist Memorial Hospital and Cancer Center-Memphis

Memphis, Tennessee, 38120, United States

Location

Baptist Memorial Hospital for Women

Memphis, Tennessee, 38120, United States

Location

ThedaCare Regional Cancer Center

Appleton, Wisconsin, 54911, United States

Location

ThedaCare Cancer Care - New London

New London, Wisconsin, 54961, United States

Location

ThedaCare Cancer Care - Oshkosh

Oshkosh, Wisconsin, 54904, United States

Location

ThedaCare Cancer Care - Shawano

Shawano, Wisconsin, 54166, United States

Location

ThedaCare Cancer Care - Waupaca

Waupaca, Wisconsin, 54981, United States

Location

Doctors Cancer Center

Manatí, 00674, Puerto Rico

Location

Centro Comprensivo de Cancer de UPR

San Juan, 00927, Puerto Rico

Location

PROncology

San Juan, 00927, Puerto Rico

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Interviews as TopicEarly Intervention, EducationalEducational StatusMethodsRestraint, Physical

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public HealthChild Health ServicesCommunity Health ServicesHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and ServicesPreventive Health ServicesSocioeconomic FactorsPopulation CharacteristicsBehavior ControlTherapeuticsImmobilization

Study Officials

  • Kathryn Weaver, PhD

    Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
No Data Available
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: The primary objective of Part 1 is to refine proposed implementation strategies for delivering PGA through qualitative feedback from stakeholders. The primary objective of Part 2 is to assess the acceptability of the PGA implementation strategies, as perceived by the 3 pilot practices.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2025

First Posted

November 10, 2025

Study Start

January 14, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

April 8, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Wake Forest NCORP Research Base is committed to following the NIH Statement on Sharing Research Data (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03-032.html). As of July 2018, the WF NCORP RB signed an agreement with NCI to contribute de-identified data and data dictionaries from clinical trials conducted through our RB to the NCI NCTN/NCORP data archive within 6 months of primary and non-primary publications of phase II/III and phase III trials to https://nctn-data-archive.nci.nih.gov/. This will become the primary means for sharing raw data, and we will adhere to the guidelines spelled out in the NCTN/NCORP Data Archive Usage Guide. De-identified data from studies not covered by the agreement (e.g., phase II and observational studies) will be made available upon request. All data files will be de-identified. De-identification procedures will meet the HIPAA criteria as detailed in the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 45, Section 164.514.

Time Frame
6 months after publication for a 2 year duration
Access Criteria
upon request to NCORP@wfusm.edu
More information

Locations