Comparison of Intravesical Therapy and Surgery as Treatment Options for Bladder Cancer 2
CISTO2
2 other identifiers
observational
408
1 country
6
Brief Summary
Bladder cancer is the most common urinary tract cancer and the 6th most common cancer in the US. Yet bladder cancer research is underfunded relative to other common cancers. As a result, bladder cancer care is prone to evidence gaps that produce decision uncertainty for both patients and clinicians. The Comparison of Intravesical Therapy and Surgery as Treatment Options for Bladder Cancer Study 2 (CISTO2) has the potential to fill these critical evidence gaps, change care pathways for the management of NMIBC (non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer), and provide for personalized, patient-centered care. The purpose of CISTO2 is to conduct a large prospective study that directly compares the impact of bladder sparing therapies versus bladder removal in recurrent high-grade NMIBC patients on financial toxicity, clinical outcomes and patient and caregiver experience using standardized patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Nov 2025
Typical duration for all trials
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 3, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 5, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2028
April 21, 2026
April 1, 2026
2.1 years
November 3, 2025
April 20, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient-reported financial toxicity as measured by the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST)
The primary outcome of patient-reported financial toxicity is measured by the COST measure. The questionnaire consists of 11 items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale from zero to four. After reversing some items as indicated in the scoring manual (by reversing the sign on the original zero to four score and adding four), all item response scores are summed into a single financial toxicity score ranging from 0 to 44, with higher scores indicating less financial toxicity. Item nonresponse is accounted for by summing the items answered, multiplying by the total number of items in the scale, and then dividing by the number of items that were actually answered.
12 months after enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Patient-reported financial toxicity as measured by the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST)
24 months after enrollment
Caregiver self-reported financial distress as measured by the modified Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST)
12 months after enrollment
Patient self-reported financial well-being as measured by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Financial Well-Being Scale
12 months after enrollment
Caregiver self-reported financial well-being as measured by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Financial Well-Being Scale
12 months after enrollment
Caregiver self-reported quality of life as measured by the CareGiver Oncology Quality of Life questionnaire (CarGOQol)
12 months after enrollment
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Patients who have selected radical cystectomy
Patients with a diagnosis of recurrent high-grade NMIBC who have selected radical cystectomy
Patients who have selected bladder-sparing therapy
Patients with a diagnosis of recurrent high-grade NMIBC who have selected bladder-sparing therapy (BST)
Caregivers of patients who have selected radical cystectomy
Caregivers of patients with a diagnosis of recurrent high-grade NMIBC who have selected radical cystectomy
Caregivers of patients who have selected bladder-sparing therapy
Caregivers of patients with a diagnosis of recurrent high-grade NMIBC who have selected bladder-sparing therapy (BST)
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with a diagnosis of recurrent high-grade NMIBC who are considering their next treatment will be approached for participation in this observational study in addition to their caregivers.
You may qualify if:
- Adult 18 years of age or older; and
- Presenting with high-grade NMIBC established by anatomic pathology as tumor stage classification Tis, Ta, or T1, and with:
- Pathology documentation from any hospital/clinic/medical center
- More than 50% urothelial carcinoma component in the specimen; and
- History of high-grade NMIBC established by anatomic pathology as tumor stage classification Tis, Ta, or T1; and
- In the previous 12 months, received at least one instillation of any intravesical agent (induction or maintenance) or one administration of systemic therapy for NMIBC treatment.
You may not qualify if:
- Any plasmacytoid or small cell (neuroendocrine) component in the pathology (past or current presentation);
- Previous history of cystectomy or radiation therapy for bladder cancer;
- Previous history of muscle-invasive bladder cancer or metastatic bladder cancer;
- Incarcerated in a detention facility or in police custody at baseline/screening (patients wearing a monitoring device can be enrolled);
- Contraindication to radical cystectomy (e.g., ASA of 4, patient not considered a radical cystectomy candidate due to comorbidity);
- Contraindication to BST (i.e., intolerant of all intravesical and intravenous medical therapies);
- Unable to provide written informed consent in English;
- Unable to be contacted for research surveys;
- Planning to participate in a blinded interventional clinical trial for NMIBC such that details about treatment or therapy received will be unavailable for data collection.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Washingtonlead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (6)
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John L Gore, MD, MS
Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Vice Chair of Research, Professor, School of Medicine: Urology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 3, 2025
First Posted
November 5, 2025
Study Start
November 3, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2028
Last Updated
April 21, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share