AutoFocus360 Sound Quality Preference and Claims Study
AF360
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to generate clinical evidence to substantiate performance claims for the AutoFocus 360 feature in Sonova hearing aid products. AutoFocus 360 is designed to enhance speech intelligibility by detecting the direction of incoming speech and dynamically steering the beamformer toward the talker, regardless of their position relative to the listener. Preliminary internal testing suggested potential benefits in reducing noise disturbance and improving speech clarity compared to traditional directional microphone modes, with outcomes depending on noise type, talker location, and microphone configuration. The present study will systematically evaluate sound quality and listening performance with AutoFocus 360 versus conventional fixed directional settings to support claims of improved speech understanding in noise.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 5, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 27, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 19, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 19, 2026
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 10, 2026
CompletedAugust 10, 2026
June 1, 2026
4 months
November 3, 2025
May 13, 2026
June 24, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Noise Disturbance Sound Quality Attribute
Participants will complete an A-B paired-comparison listening task to assess subjective preference for noise disturbance between two hearing aid conditions. In other words, participants will be asked "which sample has less disturbing noise". During testing, participants will listen to short audio recordings that vary in talker location and noise type. For each trial, participants will indicate which of the two recordings (A or B) has less bothersome background noise. The outcome measure will be the the percentage of "A preferred" versus "B preferred" responses aggregated across all trials and participants for a given noise and talker location. In other words, for a single noise x talker location combination, the outcome measures for AF360 and FWD should add up to 100. Binary preference data will be analyzed using inferential statistics.
During a single 2-hour onsite study session
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Speech Clarity Sound Quality Attribute
During a single 2-hour onsite study session
Study Arms (1)
Participant group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will listen to scenes of a talker speaking in two types of noise from either the front, left, rear, and right using AutoFocus360 and fixed directional microphones. Condition order is randomized between participants and masked from participants and experimenters.
Interventions
AutoFocus 360 is a feature that enhances speech intelligibility by detecting the direction from where speech is coming from relative to the hearing aid wearer and steering the beamforming towards the direction of the speech.
Fixed directional microphones delivers static beamforming towards the front of the hearing aid wearer.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults (18-99 years)
- Binaural, symmetric, sensorineural N2 (mild) to N5 (moderate-severe) hearing loss
- Fluent in English
You may not qualify if:
- Minors (\< 18 years
- Normal hearing or hearing loss \> N6 (severe)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sonova Canada Inc.
Kitchener, Ontario, N2E 1Y6, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Ten of the 30 participants completed an earlier version of the protocol whose data are not reported in the final study results. Those ten participants were enrolled in the study. However, their data were withdrawn due to their protocol no longer being valid.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jonathan Vaisberg
- Organization
- Sonova
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jinyu Qian, PhD
Sonova AG
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Scientist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 3, 2025
First Posted
November 5, 2025
Study Start
November 27, 2025
Primary Completion
March 19, 2026
Study Completion
March 19, 2026
Last Updated
August 10, 2026
Results First Posted
August 10, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share