NCT07223918

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to determine the Usability and Acceptability of a personalized online decision support tool for patients, families, and providers considering long-term breathing support options for patients who cannot breathe by themselves. The tool is called TRACH-Support. The key questions are:

  1. 1.Is TRACH-Support usable and acceptable to people who make decisions for patients on breathing machines.
  2. 2.Is TRACH-Support usable, acceptable, appropriate, and feasible for medical providers, nurses, and respiratory therapists who care for patients on breathing machines.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
105

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2024

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 29, 2025

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 3, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

November 3, 2025

Status Verified

October 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

October 29, 2025

Last Update Submit

October 30, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

acute respiratory failureprolonged mechanical ventilationtracheostomyshared decision-making

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • System Usability Scale

    The System Usability Scale is a 10-item questionnaire using a 5-level Likert scale designed to assess the usability of systems and interventions. The score ranges from 0-100 with higher numbers indicating greater usability.

    Baseline

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Acceptability of Intervention Measure

    Baseline

  • Feasibility of Intervention Measure

    Baseline

  • Intervention Appropriateness Measure

    Baseline

  • Decisional Conflict Scale (low literacy)

    Baseline

Study Arms (2)

Surrogates

Surrogate decision-makers are individuals who the primary medical team has determined to be the decision-maker for incapacitated patients on ventilators. Surrogates will be asked to review TRACH-Support if the patient has been receiving mechanical ventilation for \>7 days or has been asked to consider a tracheostomy.

Behavioral: TRACH-Support

Healthcare Team Members

Healthcare team members will include critical care and palliative care physicians, APPs, nurses, and respiratory therapists who work in critical care units and routinely engage in discussions with surrogates about tracheostomy and prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Behavioral: TRACH-Support

Interventions

TRACH-SupportBEHAVIORAL

TRACH-Support is a newly developed personalized online decision-support tool designed to support shared decision-making for tracheostomy and prolonged mechanical ventilation decision-making (https://www.patientdecisionaid.org/trachsupport/introduction/).

Healthcare Team MembersSurrogates

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study will focus on 2 broad groups. Surrogates - Almost all patients receiving mechanical ventilation lack decisional capacity. Therefore, all key medical decisions are made by surrogate decision-makers including decisions related to tracheostomy and PMV. We will recruit surrogate decision-makers identified by the primary medical team to evaluate TRACH-Support for patients who have received MV for 7 days or more or for whom a tracheostomy discussion is planned. Healthcare Team Members - early qualitative data indicates that decision-making often involves the entire healthcare team. Therefore, we will recruit providers, nurses, and respiratory therapists routinely involved in the care of patients receiving MV to evaluate TRACH-Support.

You may qualify if:

  • Surrogates
  • Age \>18 years
  • English or Spanish speaking
  • Surrogate decision-maker for a patient who has been receiving mechanical ventilation for greater than or equal to 7 days or in whom a tracheostomy discussion is planned. The role of surrogate decision-maker will be determined by the medical team (can be either a medical decision power of attorney (MDPOA) or proxy decision-maker).
  • As many decisions are made by a group of surrogates rather than a single surrogate, up to 3 surrogates per patient will be enrolled.
  • Healthcare Team Members
  • Age \> 18 years
  • A critical care or palliative care physician (MD/DO), advanced practice provider (APP), nurse, or respiratory therapist who routinely engages in tracheostomy and PMV discussions

You may not qualify if:

  • Surrogates
  • Age \< 18 years
  • Non-English or Non-Spanish speaking
  • Prisoner
  • Healthcare Team Members
  • Age \< 18 years
  • refuses to evaluate TRACH-Support
  • refuses to discuss alternatives to tracheostomy with families

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Denver Health and Hospital Authority

Denver, Colorado, 80204, United States

Location

Related Links

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2025

First Posted

November 3, 2025

Study Start

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion

June 30, 2025

Study Completion

June 30, 2025

Last Updated

November 3, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

As an observational study we do not plan on sharing individual participant data outside of the research team other than de-identified quotes from qualitative interviews.

Locations