Postpartum Education Via Artificial Intelligence for Recovery and Loneliness: A Randomized Controlled Trial
PEARL
1 other identifier
interventional
130
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether a postpartum chatbot powered by generative artificial intelligence (genAI) can help new mothers get better pelvic floor health information and feel less lonely after childbirth. The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- Does using the chatbot improve postpartum pelvic floor health knowledge?
- Does using the chatbot help reduce feelings of loneliness during the postpartum period?
- Does using the chatbot impact pelvic floor symptoms? Researchers will compare standard postpartum care to standard care plus the chatbot. Participants will: Be assigned by chance (like flipping a coin) to standard postpartum care with or without access to the chatbot. If in the chatbot group, participants will receive education and support via the chatbot over a 4-week period. Both groups will complete questionnaires to measure their pelvic floor knowledge, pelvic floor symptoms, feelings of loneliness, depression, infant bonding, perceived social support, adverse childhood experiences, and peri-traumatic distress. The chatbot was created by urogynecology experts in collaboration with UC San Diego computer science and biomedical informatics researchers. The chatbot is designed to give new mothers personalized, evidence-based information and support in real time.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 3, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 10, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2026
November 3, 2025
October 1, 2025
11 months
October 31, 2025
October 31, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Prolapse and incontinence knowledge
Prolapse and incontinence knowledge will be assessed via the validated prolapse and incontinence knowledge questionnaire (PIKQ). This is a validated, self-administered instrument designed to assess women's knowledge about the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. The PIKQ has been used in the postpartum population.This questionnaire consists of two 12 item sub-scales (total of 24 questions) with answer options of "agree", "disagree", or "don't know". Correct answers receive 1 point, while incorrect answers receive 0 points. Sub-scale score ranges from 0-12 and total score ranges from 0-24. Higher scores indicate more knowledge. We aim to detect a clinically meaningful difference of 4 points between the control and intervention group. This 4-point difference represents approximately a 17% increase in knowledge and is considered a reasonable effect based on prior literature and the nature of the educational intervention.
Will be administered to both groups at three time points: 1) at enrollment, 2) post-intervention or standard of care, 3) at 6 months postpartum.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Loneliness scores
Will be administered to both groups at three time points: 1) at enrollment, 2) post-intervention or standard of care, 3) at 6 months postpartum.
Pelvic Floor Distress
Will be administered to both groups at three time points: 1) at enrollment, 2) post-intervention or standard of care, 3) at 6 months postpartum.
Other Outcomes (6)
Patient global impression of improvement (PGI-I)
Will be administered to both groups at three time points: 1) at enrollment, 2) post-intervention or standard of care, 3) at 6 months postpartum.
Mother to Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS)
Will be administered to both groups at three time points: 1) at enrollment, 2) post-intervention or standard of care, 3) at 6 months postpartum.
Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI)
Will be administered to both groups at three time points: 1) at enrollment, 2) post-intervention or standard of care, 3) at 6 months postpartum.
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Standard postpartum care
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard postpartum care
Generative AI Chatbot Intervention
EXPERIMENTALGenerative AI Chatbot Intervention
Interventions
Participants randomly assigned to the chatbot intervention will be provided a URL to a secure, HIPAA-compliant web application hosted by UC San Diego (https://knolohealth.org/). This application features a generative AI-powered chatbot designed to deliver postpartum pelvic floor education and support. The chatbot is available for a 4-week period following enrollment and can be accessed at any time during that window. The chatbot's educational content is grounded in reputable, evidence-based resources, including national and international urogynecology patient education materials, as well as postpartum recovery guidelines. Participants can interact with the chatbot to ask questions and will receive tailored educational responses related to pelvic floor health. No additional in-person study visits are required for the intervention. Chatbot usage data (e.g., frequency, timing and content of chatbot interactions) will be collected to assess engagement and user needs.
Access to the same postpartum care that participants would receive if they did not participate in the study.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Has the capacity to provide informed consent
- Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
- Postpartum persons, aged \>18 years old
- Primiparous
- Vaginal or cesarean delivery
- English Speaking
- Internet access and proficiency of internet access
- Access to a smartphone
- Postpartum 2-6 weeks
You may not qualify if:
- Multiparous
- Major neonatal anomaly
- Delivery \< 34 weeks gestational age
- Intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD)
- Enrollment in any interfering studies
- Unanticipated NICU admission
- Discharge home without live baby
- Surrogates/gestational carrier
- Birthing individuals with baby placed for adoption
- Currently pregnant
- Psychiatric history requiring psychiatric hospitalization prior to delivery
- Other psychiatric conditions needing immediate attention and intervention as determined by study team and/or treatment team
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California San Diego
La Jolla, California, 92093, United States
Related Publications (58)
Can FG, Akis G, Solmaz E. The effect of the level of perceived social support in the postpartum period on maternal functioning and maternal attachment. J Pediatr Nurs. 2024 Nov-Dec;79:e192-e202. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2024.10.021. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
PMID: 39472191BACKGROUNDCanty-Mitchell J, Zimet GD. Psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support in urban adolescents. Am J Community Psychol. 2000 Jun;28(3):391-400. doi: 10.1023/A:1005109522457.
PMID: 10945123BACKGROUNDCox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;150:782-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782.
PMID: 3651732BACKGROUNDJagodnik KM, Ein-Dor T, Chan SJ, Titelman Ashkenazy A, Bartal A, Barry RL, Dekel S. Screening for post-traumatic stress disorder following childbirth using the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory. J Affect Disord. 2024 Mar 1;348:17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.12.010. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
PMID: 38070747BACKGROUNDTaylor A, Atkins R, Kumar R, Adams D, Glover V. A new Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale: links with early maternal mood. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2005 May;8(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s00737-005-0074-z. Epub 2005 May 4.
PMID: 15868385BACKGROUNDChiu JL, Wei LC. Loneliness as a Predictor of Disability in Older Adults: Implications of the UCLA Loneliness Scale Cutoff Score Across Cultural Contexts. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2024 Nov;39(11):e70011. doi: 10.1002/gps.70011.
PMID: 39516187BACKGROUNDGosling CJ, Colle R, Cartigny A, Jollant F, Corruble E, Frajerman A. Measuring loneliness: a head-to-head psychometric comparison of the 3- and 20-item UCLA Loneliness Scales. Psychol Med. 2024 Oct 31;54(14):1-7. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724002083. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 39479755BACKGROUNDShah AD, Massagli MP, Kohli N, Rajan SS, Braaten KP, Hoyte L. A reliable, valid instrument to assess patient knowledge about urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Sep;19(9):1283-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0631-x. Epub 2008 May 15.
PMID: 18480958BACKGROUNDLarsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, Nguyen TD. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale. Eval Program Plann. 1979;2(3):197-207. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(79)90094-6. No abstract available.
PMID: 10245370BACKGROUNDSuharwardy S, Ramachandran M, Leonard SA, Gunaseelan A, Lyell DJ, Darcy A, Robinson A, Judy A. Feasibility and impact of a mental health chatbot on postpartum mental health: a randomized controlled trial. AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 Mar 29;3(3):100165. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100165. eCollection 2023 Aug.
PMID: 37560011BACKGROUNDHarris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
PMID: 18929686BACKGROUNDKim M, Lee S, Kim S, Heo JI, Lee S, Shin YB, Cho CH, Jung D. Therapeutic Potential of Social Chatbots in Alleviating Loneliness and Social Anxiety: Quasi-Experimental Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 14;27:e65589. doi: 10.2196/65589.
PMID: 39808786BACKGROUNDGasteiger N, Loveys K, Law M, Broadbent E. Friends from the Future: A Scoping Review of Research into Robots and Computer Agents to Combat Loneliness in Older People. Clin Interv Aging. 2021 May 24;16:941-971. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S282709. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34079242BACKGROUNDLaranjo L, Dunn AG, Tong HL, Kocaballi AB, Chen J, Bashir R, Surian D, Gallego B, Magrabi F, Lau AYS, Coiera E. Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):1248-1258. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy072.
PMID: 30010941BACKGROUNDMcAlister K, Baez L, Huberty J, Kerppola M. Chatbot to Support the Mental Health Needs of Pregnant and Postpartum Women (Moment for Parents): Design and Pilot Study. JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 8;9:e72469. doi: 10.2196/72469.
PMID: 40202166BACKGROUNDBen-Zeev D, Kaiser SM, Brenner CJ, Begale M, Duffecy J, Mohr DC. Development and usability testing of FOCUS: a smartphone system for self-management of schizophrenia. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2013 Dec;36(4):289-296. doi: 10.1037/prj0000019. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
PMID: 24015913BACKGROUNDNahum-Shani I, Smith SN, Spring BJ, Collins LM, Witkiewitz K, Tewari A, Murphy SA. Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs) in Mobile Health: Key Components and Design Principles for Ongoing Health Behavior Support. Ann Behav Med. 2018 May 18;52(6):446-462. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9830-8.
PMID: 27663578BACKGROUNDAmil S, Da SM, Plaisimond J, Roch G, Sasseville M, Bergeron F, Gagnon MP. Interactive Conversational Agents for Perinatal Health: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 8;13(4):363. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13040363.
PMID: 39997238BACKGROUNDInkster B, Kadaba M, Subramanian V. Understanding the impact of an AI-enabled conversational agent mobile app on users' mental health and wellbeing with a self-reported maternal event: a mixed method real-world data mHealth study. Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Jun 2;4:1084302. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1084302. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37332481BACKGROUNDTeoule J, Woll C, Ray J, Sutterlin M, Filsinger B. The effectiveness of integrated online health-coaching on physical activity and excessive gestational weight gain: a prospective randomized-controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jul;310(1):307-314. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07296-y. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
PMID: 38217763BACKGROUNDBravata DM, Kim J, Russell DW, Goldman R, Pace E. Digitally Enabled Peer Support Intervention to Address Loneliness and Mental Health: Prospective Cohort Analysis. JMIR Form Res. 2023 Nov 6;7:e48864. doi: 10.2196/48864.
PMID: 37930770BACKGROUNDUscher-Pines L, Kapinos K, Waymouth M, Howell K, Alvarado G, Ray K, Demirci J, Mehrotra A, Rogers R, James KF, DeYoreo M. Telelactation Services and Breastfeeding by Race and Ethnicity: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2461958. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.61958.
PMID: 40014345BACKGROUNDChae SY, Chae MH, Kandula S, Winter RO. Promoting improved social support and quality of life with the CenteringPregnancy(R) group model of prenatal care. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2017 Feb;20(1):209-220. doi: 10.1007/s00737-016-0698-1. Epub 2016 Dec 17.
PMID: 27988822BACKGROUNDRutledge E, Spiers A, Vardeman J, Griffin N, Nisar T, Muir T, Antosh DD. Educating Women About Pelvic Floor Disorders During Pregnancy From the First to the "Fourth Trimester": A Randomized Clinical Trial. Urogynecology (Phila). 2023 Sep 1;29(9):770-776. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001341.
PMID: 37607311BACKGROUNDToprak Celenay S, Coban O, Korkut Z, Alkan A. Do community-dwelling pregnant women know about pelvic floor disorder? Women Health. 2021 Jul;61(6):609-616. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2021.1942398. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
PMID: 34139962BACKGROUNDLiu J, Tan SQ, Han HC. Knowledge of pelvic floor disorder in pregnancy. Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Jun;30(6):991-1001. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03891-3. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
PMID: 30783706BACKGROUNDMandimika CL, Murk W, Muhlhauser McPencow A, Lake A, Wedderburn T, Collier CH, Connell KA, Guess MK. Knowledge of pelvic floor disorders in a population of community-dwelling women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;210(2):165.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.011. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
PMID: 24126299BACKGROUNDReagan KM, O'Sullivan DM, Harvey DP, Lasala CA. Readability of patient information pamphlets in urogynecology. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015 Mar-Apr;21(2):63-5. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000152.
PMID: 25679357BACKGROUNDMcLennan MT, Melick CF, Alten B, Young J, Hoehn MR. Patients' knowledge of potential pelvic floor changes associated with pregnancy and delivery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Jan;17(1):22-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-1325-2. Epub 2005 Jul 8.
PMID: 16003482BACKGROUNDEssex MJ, Boyce WT, Hertzman C, Lam LL, Armstrong JM, Neumann SM, Kobor MS. Epigenetic vestiges of early developmental adversity: childhood stress exposure and DNA methylation in adolescence. Child Dev. 2013 Jan-Feb;84(1):58-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01641.x. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
PMID: 21883162BACKGROUNDChampagne FA. Epigenetic influence of social experiences across the lifespan. Dev Psychobiol. 2010 May;52(4):299-311. doi: 10.1002/dev.20436.
PMID: 20175106BACKGROUNDRogers AM, Youssef GJ, Teague S, Sunderland M, Le Bas G, Macdonald JA, Mattick RP, Allsop S, Elliott EJ, Olsson CA, Hutchinson D. Association of maternal and paternal perinatal depression and anxiety with infant development: A longitudinal study. J Affect Disord. 2023 Oct 1;338:278-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.06.020. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
PMID: 37302506BACKGROUNDSlomian J, Honvo G, Emonts P, Reginster JY, Bruyere O. Consequences of maternal postpartum depression: A systematic review of maternal and infant outcomes. Womens Health (Lond). 2019 Jan-Dec;15:1745506519844044. doi: 10.1177/1745506519844044.
PMID: 31035856BACKGROUNDHane AA, Fox NA. Ordinary variations in maternal caregiving influence human infants' stress reactivity. Psychol Sci. 2006 Jun;17(6):550-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01742.x.
PMID: 16771807BACKGROUNDGunnar M, Quevedo K. The neurobiology of stress and development. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:145-73. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085605.
PMID: 16903808BACKGROUNDFan X, Wu N, Tu Y, Zang T, Bai J, Peng G, Liu Y. Perinatal depression and infant and toddler neurodevelopment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024 Apr;159:105579. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105579. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
PMID: 38342472BACKGROUNDKent-Marvick J, Simonsen S, Pentecost R, Taylor E, McFarland MM. Loneliness in pregnant and postpartum people and parents of children aged 5 years or younger: a scoping review. Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 7;11(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02065-5.
PMID: 36071448BACKGROUNDHolt-Lunstad J, Robles TF, Sbarra DA. Advancing social connection as a public health priority in the United States. Am Psychol. 2017 Sep;72(6):517-530. doi: 10.1037/amp0000103.
PMID: 28880099BACKGROUNDMandai M, Kaso M, Takahashi Y, Nakayama T. Loneliness among mothers raising children under the age of 3 years and predictors with special reference to the use of SNS: a community-based cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2018 Aug 16;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0625-x.
PMID: 30111371BACKGROUNDAdlington K, Vasquez C, Pearce E, Wilson CA, Nowland R, Taylor BL, Spring S, Johnson S. 'Just snap out of it' - the experience of loneliness in women with perinatal depression: a Meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 28;23(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04532-2.
PMID: 36849948BACKGROUNDWenhold H, Couture Bue AC, Kirkpatrick CE. #Bopo or Bounce Back?: Investigating the Impact of Social Media Videos on Postpartum Mothers. Health Commun. 2025 Nov;40(12):2674-2685. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2025.2475856. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
PMID: 40114468BACKGROUNDPassarelli E, Siddique M, Fry L, Hickman L, Propst K. Perineal lacerations and social media: can patients find reliable information on Instagram and TikTok? Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Jan;35(1):183-188. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05690-3. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
PMID: 38032377BACKGROUNDHickman LC, Propst K, Swenson CW, Lewicky-Gaupp C. Subspecialty care for peripartum pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;223(5):709-714. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.015. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
PMID: 32888923BACKGROUNDMcKinney J, Keyser L, Clinton S, Pagliano C. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 736: Optimizing Postpartum Care. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;132(3):784-785. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002849. No abstract available.
PMID: 30134408BACKGROUNDPriddis H, Dahlen H, Schmied V. Women's experiences following severe perineal trauma: a meta-ethnographic synthesis. J Adv Nurs. 2013 Apr;69(4):748-59. doi: 10.1111/jan.12005. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
PMID: 23057716BACKGROUNDPriddis HS, Schmied V, Kettle C, Sneddon A, Dahlen HG. "A patchwork of services"--caring for women who sustain severe perineal trauma in New South Wales--from the perspective of women and midwives. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jul 18;14:236. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-236.
PMID: 25034120BACKGROUNDNutaitis AC, Ferrando CA, Propst K. Patient Perspectives Following Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury. Urogynecology (Phila). 2025 Feb 1;31(2):161-169. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001506. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
PMID: 38621419BACKGROUNDWallwiener S, Muller M, Doster A, Laserer W, Reck C, Pauluschke-Frohlich J, Brucker SY, Wallwiener CW, Wallwiener M. Pregnancy eHealth and mHealth: user proportions and characteristics of pregnant women using Web-based information sources-a cross-sectional study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Nov;294(5):937-944. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4093-y. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
PMID: 27084763BACKGROUNDDeclercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP, Applebaum S, Herrlich A. Major Survey Findings of Listening to Mothers(SM) III: New Mothers Speak Out: Report of National Surveys of Women's Childbearing ExperiencesConducted October-December 2012 and January-April 2013. J Perinat Educ. 2014 Winter;23(1):17-24. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.23.1.17.
PMID: 24453464BACKGROUNDTully KP, Stuebe AM, Verbiest SB. The fourth trimester: a critical transition period with unmet maternal health needs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.032. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
PMID: 28390671BACKGROUNDGavin NI, Gaynes BN, Lohr KN, Meltzer-Brody S, Gartlehner G, Swinson T. Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Nov;106(5 Pt 1):1071-83. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000183597.31630.db.
PMID: 16260528BACKGROUNDHarrison V, Moore D, Lazard L. Supporting perinatal anxiety in the digital age; a qualitative exploration of stressors and support strategies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jun 17;20(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02990-0.
PMID: 32546131BACKGROUNDGonzalez-Timoneda A, Valles-Murcia N, Munoz Esteban P, Torres Lopez MS, Turrion Martinez E, Errandonea Garcia P, Serrano Raya L, Nohales Alfonso F. Prevalence and impact of pelvic floor dysfunctions on quality of life in women 5-10 years after their first vaginal or caesarian delivery. Heliyon. 2025 Jan 21;11(3):e42018. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42018. eCollection 2025 Feb 15.
PMID: 39916837BACKGROUNDCassado J, Simo M, Rodriguez N, Porta O, Huguet E, Mora I, Girvent M, Fernandez R, Gich I. Prevalence of levator ani avulsion in a multicenter study (PAMELA study). Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Jul;302(1):273-280. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05585-4. Epub 2020 May 24.
PMID: 32449062BACKGROUNDDeLancey JOL, Masteling M, Pipitone F, LaCross J, Mastrovito S, Ashton-Miller JA. Pelvic floor injury during vaginal birth is life-altering and preventable: what can we do about it? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;230(3):279-294.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.11.1253. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
PMID: 38168908BACKGROUNDLien KC, Mooney B, DeLancey JO, Ashton-Miller JA. Levator ani muscle stretch induced by simulated vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jan;103(1):31-40. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000109207.22354.65.
PMID: 14704241BACKGROUNDWu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS, Redden DT, Burgio KL, Richter HE, Markland AD. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;123(1):141-148. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000057.
PMID: 24463674BACKGROUNDNygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J, Spino C, Whitehead WE, Wu J, Brody DJ; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA. 2008 Sep 17;300(11):1311-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.11.1311.
PMID: 18799443BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor OBGYN & Reproductive Sciences
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2025
First Posted
November 3, 2025
Study Start
November 10, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Last Updated
November 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Single site location and current IRB approval is for no data sharing.