Long-Term Stability of the Glide Control Strategy
Determining the Long-Term Stability of the Glide Control Strategy for Upper Limb Prostheses
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
10
Brief Summary
This research is intended to test whether the prescription of the Glide prosthesis control system reduces the burden of use for both patients and their clinical care team as compared to use of Pattern Recognition-based advanced myoelectric control. The goal of the study is to fill the gaps in clinically relevant knowledge to inform the prescription of prosthesis components and the rehabilitation process.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2025
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 27, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 29, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2029
November 5, 2025
November 1, 2025
3 years
October 27, 2025
November 3, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Daily Mean Number of Control Adjustment Sessions (DMNCAS)
DMNCAS quantifies the number of times a prosthesis user needs to adjust their control strategy to maintain performance. For a PR system, a control adjustment refers to a calibration (or recalibration) of one or more prosthesis movements, while for the Glide control strategy, a control adjustment refers to a change in the Glide map configuration (e.g., electrode gains, slice geometries, assigned movements, etc.). A control adjustment session is then a period of time devoted to performing one or more control adjustments. The number and duration of control adjustment sessions will be recorded in a study diary.
Weekly, From Prosthesis Delivery (Day 0) to the End of Treatment (Day 168)
Number of Follow-Up Clinical Interventions (NFCI)
NFCI reports the number of times the prosthesis user requests the aid of a clinician to resolve an issue with their prescribed control strategy. NFCI refers to clinical interventions (both remote and in-person) that occur post-prosthesis delivery, the number and duration of which will be recorded in a study diary. Diary entries will be verified through a retrospective chart review in collaboration with Medical Center Orthotics \& Prosthetics.
Weekly, From Prosthesis Delivery (Day 0) to End of Treatment (Day 168)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Socket Comfort Score (SCS)
Weekly, From Prosthesis Delivery (Day 0) to End of Treatment (Day 168)
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Weekly, From Prosthesis Delivery (Day 0) to End of Treatment (Day 168)
PROMIS Pain Interference - Short Form 4a
Weekly, From Prosthesis Delivery (Day 0) to End of Treatment (Day 168)
PROMIS Satisfaction - Short Form 8a
Weekly, From Prosthesis Delivery (Day 0) to End of Treatment (Day 168)
OPUS Upper Extremity Functional Scale (UEFS)
Weekly, From Prosthesis Delivery (Day 0) to End of Treatment (Day 168)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Glide then Pattern Recognition
EXPERIMENTALParticipants use a Glide-controlled upper limb prosthesis first, followed by a Pattern Recognition-based upper limb prosthesis.
Pattern Recognition then Glide
EXPERIMENTALParticipants use a Pattern Recognition-based upper limb prosthesis first, followed by a Glide-controlled upper limb prosthesis.
Interventions
Glide is a commercially developed directional myoelectric control strategy from Infinite Biomedical Technologies (IBT) that sits between classic Direct Control (DC) and modern Pattern Recognition (PR). Instead of requiring an isolated on/off muscle signal for each function (e.g., DC) or training a complex classifier on many gestures (e.g., PR), Glide uses the relative activity across 2-8 EMG electrodes to move a virtual cursor on a 2-D "Glide map." The map is divided into adjustable sectors ("slices"), and each slice is assigned a prosthetic movement (e.g., hand open/close, wrist rotation, elbow flexion). Moving the cursor into a slice actuates that movement.
Pattern recognition (PR)-based myoelectric control is a data-driven approach that allows a user to control multiple prosthetic functions using natural muscle activation patterns rather than discrete, isolated signals. Instead of mapping one muscle to one motion (as in conventional Direct Control), PR systems record the spatial and temporal pattern of EMG activity from multiple sites on the residual limb and use machine learning algorithms to classify which intended movement the user is trying to make.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Unilateral trans-radial or trans-humeral limb loss with a healed residual limb
- Candidate for 2+ degree-of-freedom (DOF) myoelectric prosthesis as determined by the study prosthetist
- Age of 18 years or greater
You may not qualify if:
- Prior experience with Pattern Recognition or Glide control
- Individuals with a residual limb that is unhealed from the amputation surgery
- Individuals with easily damaged or sensitive skin who would not tolerate EMG electrodes
- Significant cognitive deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
- Significant neurological deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
- Significant physical deficits of the residual limb impacting full participation in the study as determined upon clinical evaluation
- Uncontrolled pain or phantom pain impacting full participation in the study as determined upon clinical evaluation
- Serious uncontrolled medical problems
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
Medical Center Orthotics and Prosthetics - Annapolis
Annapolis, Maryland, 21401, United States
Medical Center Orthotics and Prosthetics - Baltimore
Baltimore, Maryland, 21227, United States
Medical Center Orthotics and Prosthetics - Silver Spring
Silver Spring, Maryland, 20910, United States
Medical Center Orthotics and Prosthetics - Allston
Allston, Massachusetts, 02134, United States
Medical Center Orthotics and Prosthetics - Milton
Milton, Massachusetts, 02186, United States
Medical Center Orthotics and Prosthetics - Charlotte
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210, United States
Medical Center Orthotics and Prosthetics - Anderson
Anderson, South Carolina, 29621, United States
Medical Center Orthotics and Prosthetics - Greenville
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615, United States
Medical Center Orthotics and Prosthetics - Fairfax
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031, United States
Medical Center Orthotics and Prosthetics - Leesburg
Leesburg, Virginia, 20176, United States
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 27, 2025
First Posted
October 29, 2025
Study Start
October 15, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2029
Last Updated
November 5, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11