Epidural Wave Form Analysis vs Fluoroscopic Guidance for Thoracic Epidural Placement
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of epidural waveform analysis (EWA) with fluoroscopic guidance for confirmation of successful epidural placement. In this study, participants will undergo both EWA and fluoroscopy. EWA involves measuring the pressure in the epidural space once accessed and determining whether or not a waveform that corresponds with the participant's heart rate is present. The pressure measuring apparatus is the same that is used for direct pressure monitoring elsewhere in the body (i.e. invasive arterial catheters or intracranial pressure monitoring).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 12, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 12, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 16, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
October 16, 2025
October 1, 2025
12 months
October 12, 2025
October 14, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value of epidural waveform analysis to predict epidural access compared with fluoroscopic guidance
Time of enrollment through completion of epidural placement. Epidural placement occurs on study day 1 and is generally completed within 2 hours of study enrollment.
Study Arms (1)
Study Cohort
EXPERIMENTALThe primary objective of this study is to assess the accuracy with which epidural waveform analysis (EWA) can confirm epidural access in comparison to the gold standard of fluoroscopic confirmation (FC). Our hypothesis is that FC is superior to EWA. We will determine the Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value of EWA referenced to FC.Every participant enrolled in the study will be in the experimental arm and will undergo epidural waveform analysis and fluoroscopic confirmation of epidural access.
Interventions
All participants in this study will undergo epidural waveform analysis (pressure measurements) and fluoroscopic guidance of epidural placement. Epidural waveform analysis as method to determine epidural access will be compared to fluoroscopic confirmation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years or older
- Undergoing surgery at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
- Scheduled for planned (non-emergent, non-urgent) thoracic epidural placement as part of surgery and anesthesia
- English speaking
- Must have capacity for consent
You may not qualify if:
- Non-english speaking
- Incarceration
- Pregnant
- Minors (under age 18)
- Inability to provide consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756, United States
Related Publications (2)
Hong JH, Jung SW. Analysis of epidural waveform for cervical epidural steroid injections confirmed with fluoroscopy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(13):e0202. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010202.
PMID: 29595657BACKGROUNDArnuntasupakul V, Van Zundert TC, Vijitpavan A, Aliste J, Engsusophon P, Leurcharusmee P, Ah-Kye S, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. A Randomized Comparison Between Conventional and Waveform-Confirmed Loss of Resistance for Thoracic Epidural Blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 May-Jun;41(3):368-73. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000369.
PMID: 26894628BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alexander Abess, MD
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 12, 2025
First Posted
October 16, 2025
Study Start
September 12, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
October 16, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Participant privacy considerations remain paramount. De-identified data could be shared at some point if deemed helpful by other researchers and if approved by our institution review board and privacy officers.