NCT07212192

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if 10% Lidocaine spray can reduce local pain caused by intravenous (IV) intubation among women. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does 10% Lidocaine spray lower the VAS score in participants need intravenous intubation?
  • What size effect of 10% Lidocaine spray when patients administered? Researchers will compare 10% Lidocaine spray to a placebo (a look-alike substance that contains no drug) to see if 10% Lidocaine spray works to reduce local pain caused by intravenous (IV) intubation Participants will:
  • Receive 3 spray of 10% Lidocaine at intravenous catheter insertion site before the nurse perform the IV insert procedure
  • Assess the pain cause by IV insertion using VAS

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 pregnancy

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2025

Shorter than P25 for phase_3 pregnancy

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 30, 2025

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 8, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 24, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2025

Completed
25 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 25, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

December 1, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

September 30, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 23, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

LidocaineIV painC-Section

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain score

    The Pain score will be measured by a visual analog scale (VAS). This is a validated, subjective measure of pain. It is typically a 10-cm line, used to assess a person's perception of pain, discomfort, or other subjective feelings by having them mark a point on the line that best represents their experience. It ranged from 0 to 10, with 0 meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "worst pain ever". The greater score, indicate greater pain.

    After the nurse insert the IV into the participants

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Adverse event

    List any side effect of Lidocaine reported by participant or observed by PI within 2 hours after the IV has been inserted

Study Arms (3)

Group 2

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants will be given three sprays sterilized saline solution 3 minutes before the interventionist performed the insertion of a catheter into their vein

Combination Product: Sterilized saline solution

Group 3

NO INTERVENTION

Non intervention will be perform rather than usual care

Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will be given three sprays of 10% Lidocaine (Lidocaine 10% pump spray, Egis) 3 minutes before the interventionist performed the insertion of a catheter into their vein

Drug: Lidocain spray

Interventions

Applying 3 spray of 10% Lidocaine to the IV insertion site in women before their C-section

Intervention
Sterilized saline solutionCOMBINATION_PRODUCT

Participants will be given three sprays sterilized saline solution 3 minutes before the interventionist performed the insertion of a catheter into their vein

Group 2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Over 18 years old
  • Able to read and write Vietnamese.
  • Sign the consent form

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants who were emergency cases for going to a C-section delivery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (9)

  • Luangtangvarodom W, Pongrojpaw D, Chanthasenanont A, Pattaraarchachai J, Bhamarapravatana K, Suwannarurk K. The Efficacy of Lidocaine Spray in Pain Relief during Outpatient-Based Endometrial Sampling: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Pain Res Treat. 2018 Oct 21;2018:1238627. doi: 10.1155/2018/1238627. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 30420917BACKGROUND
  • Dalvandi A, Ranjbar H, Hatamizadeh M, Rahgoi A, Bernstein C. Comparing the effectiveness of vapocoolant spray and lidocaine/procaine cream in reducing pain of intravenous cannulation: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;35(8):1064-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.02.039. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

    PMID: 28285862BACKGROUND
  • Kartufan FF. Padded Dressing with Lidocaine HCL for Reducing Pain during Intravenous Cannulation in Adult Patients: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Biomed Res Int. 2022 Apr 23;2022:6128557. doi: 10.1155/2022/6128557. eCollection 2022.

    PMID: 35502334BACKGROUND
  • Datema J, Veldhuis J, Bekhof J. Lidocaine spray as a local analgesic for intravenous cannulation: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;26(1):24-28. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000496.

    PMID: 28799984BACKGROUND
  • Basaranoglu G, Basaranoglu M, Erden V, Delatioglu H, Pekel AF, Saitoglu L. The effects of Valsalva manoeuvres on venepuncture pain. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Jul;23(7):591-3. doi: 10.1017/S0265021506000160. Epub 2006 Mar 1.

    PMID: 16507182BACKGROUND
  • Alan N, Khorshid L. Evaluation of Efficacy of Valsalva Maneuver During Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation on Pain. Pain Manag Nurs. 2022 Apr;23(2):220-224. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

    PMID: 33712356BACKGROUND
  • Hocking G, Weightman WM, Smith C, Gibbs NM, Sherrard K. Measuring the quality of anaesthesia from a patient's perspective: development, validation, and implementation of a short questionnaire. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Dec;111(6):979-89. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet284. Epub 2013 Aug 28.

    PMID: 23985532BACKGROUND
  • Goudra BG, Galvin E, Singh PM, Lions J. Effect of site selection on pain of intravenous cannula insertion: A prospective randomised study. Indian J Anaesth. 2014 Nov-Dec;58(6):732-5. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.147166.

    PMID: 25624538BACKGROUND
  • Sebbane M, Claret PG, Lefebvre S, Mercier G, Rubenovitch J, Jreige R, Eledjam JJ, de La Coussaye JE. Predicting peripheral venous access difficulty in the emergency department using body mass index and a clinical evaluation of venous accessibility. J Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;44(2):299-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.07.051. Epub 2012 Sep 13.

    PMID: 22981661BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Huong Hoang, PhD

    Phenikaa University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Vice - Dean of Nursing Faculty

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2025

First Posted

October 8, 2025

Study Start

November 24, 2025

Primary Completion

December 31, 2025

Study Completion

January 25, 2026

Last Updated

December 1, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11