NCT07211009

Brief Summary

Symptom management is fundamental to clinical care, and symptom monitoring is an effective means to detect potential adverse events early and prevent serious complications. Extensive studies show that symptom management based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can reduce symptom burden, improve functional status and quality of life, lower emergency visits and readmissions, and even prolong survival. However, in the field of esophageal cancer surgery, prospective clinical studies assessing the feasibility of postoperative PRO-based symptom management remain lacking. This project proposes a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in China to systematically evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of PRO-based symptom management after esophageal cancer surgery. Through this clinical study, we aim to assess both the impact and the implementability of introducing a proactive, patient-centered PRO symptom-management model into esophageal surgical care.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
240

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
32mo left

Started Oct 2025

Typical duration for phase_3

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress17%
Oct 2025Dec 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 29, 2025

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 7, 2025

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 15, 2025

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2028

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2028

Last Updated

October 7, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

September 29, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 29, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • 90-Day Postoperative Complication Rate After Esophagectomy

    Proportion of patients who develop any surgery-related complication within 90 days after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Complication types and grades will follow the 2023 Chinese Expert Consensus on the Definition and Grading of Perioperative Complications in Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancer; complications are graded I-V, with higher grades indicating greater severity.

    Postoperative days 7, 14, 30, 60, and 90, complications will be assessed and recorded at each time point.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • 90-Day Postoperative Mortality

    Postoperative days 30, 60, and 90, death events will be recorded, and causes of death will be analyzed.

  • Number of Symptom-Threshold Events

    Assess each patient-reported symptom on the day of discharge and 1 day before discharge, and on postoperative days 30, 60, and 90, and record the score for each symptom.

Study Arms (2)

PRO Symptom Management Group

EXPERIMENTAL

In the PRO arm, participants receive postoperative, PRO-based symptom management: when any target symptom score in the self-report system reaches or exceeds the predefined intervention threshold (≥2 points, indicating moderate to very severe), the system sends a real-time alert to the surgeon. The surgeon implements an intervention within the specified time window according to symptom severity. After discharge, follow-up and management are conducted via WeChat, text message, or telephone. All interventions are formulated based on relevant literature, guidelines, and expert consensus.

Other: Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO)-Based Symptom Management

Conventional Management Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In the control arm, participants receive conventional postoperative symptom management. The electronic questionnaires use the same content and time points as the intervention arm, but reported symptoms do not trigger alerts, and surgeons cannot view the scores. During hospitalization, surgeons typically assess symptom severity based on patient reports during morning and afternoon rounds and manage care according to the same guidelines and consensus as the intervention arm. After discharge, no proactive symptom management is provided unless the patient actively seeks medical assistance.

Other: Conventional Management

Interventions

Postoperative esophageal cancer patients will receive a PRO (patient-reported outcome) symptom self-report system via a WeChat mini-program/electronic form. The system covers 12 target symptoms-pain, fever, cough with sputum, dyspnea, palpitations, fatigue and activity limitation, nausea/vomiting, acid reflux/heartburn, abdominal bloating, diarrhea, swallowing obstruction (dysphagia), and hoarseness with coughing when drinking-and uses a five-level severity scale: 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), 3 (severe), and 4 (very severe). If any of the 12 symptom scores entered in the mini-program reaches the predefined intervention threshold (≥2, indicating moderate to very severe), the system sends a real-time alert to the surgeon, who is required to respond within a specified time window. After discharge, interventions are delivered via WeChat, text message, or telephone. Interventions mainly include counseling, patient education, prescription medication.

PRO Symptom Management Group

Patients in the control arm receive conventional postoperative symptom management. The electronic questionnaires use the same content and time points as the intervention arm, but reported symptoms do not trigger alerts, and surgeons cannot view the symptom scores. During the postoperative inpatient stay, surgeons typically assess symptom severity based on patient reports during morning and afternoon rounds and manage symptoms according to the same guidelines and consensus as the intervention arm. After discharge, patients do not receive proactive symptom management from their primary surgeon unless they actively seek medical care.

Conventional Management Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18-75 years.
  • Pathologically confirmed esophageal cancer.
  • Planned to undergo curative (radical) surgical resection.
  • R0 resection.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≤ 1.
  • Adequate function of major organs.
  • Willing to complete questionnaire surveys.
  • Voluntarily agrees to participate and signs the informed consent form.
  • Good compliance and able to complete follow-up as scheduled.

You may not qualify if:

  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
  • Psychiatric disorder.
  • Any other malignancy within the past 5 years (except completely cured carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal cell/squamous cell carcinoma of the skin).
  • Patient ultimately did not undergo curative (radical) surgical resection.
  • Any unstable systemic disease (including active, uncontrolled gastrointestinal ulcer; active infection; grade 4 hypertension; unstable angina; congestive heart failure; unstable cerebrovascular disease; thrombotic disease; hepatic, renal, or metabolic disease; or unhealed fracture/wound as determined by the surgeon).
  • Difficulty in communication or inability to comply with long-term follow-up.
  • Any other condition deemed unsuitable by the investigator.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Esophageal Neoplasms

Interventions

Patient Reported Outcome Measures

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsHead and Neck NeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Health Care SurveysSurveys and QuestionnairesData CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Services ResearchHealth PlanningHealth Care Economics and OrganizationsPatient Outcome AssessmentOutcome Assessment, Health CareOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareQuality of Health CareHealth Services AdministrationHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2025

First Posted

October 7, 2025

Study Start

October 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Last Updated

October 7, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09